Management of Asymmetric Septal HCM with LVOT Obstruction and 10% Midwall Fibrosis
This patient requires immediate initiation of non-vasodilating beta-blockers as first-line therapy, titrated to a resting heart rate of 60-65 bpm, with consideration for septal reduction therapy if symptoms persist despite optimal medical management. 1, 2
Initial Pharmacologic Management
First-Line Therapy: Beta-Blockers
- Start non-vasodilating beta-blockers (propranolol, nadolol, or bisoprolol) and titrate to maximum tolerated dose 1, 2
- Target resting heart rate of 60-65 bpm to optimize diastolic filling and reduce LVOT gradient 2, 3
- Beta-blockers reduce contractility, prolong diastolic filling time, and can prevent exercise-induced LVOT obstruction in 52% of patients 3
- Continue beta-blockers without interruption in the perioperative period if surgery is needed 1
Second-Line Therapy: Non-Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers
- If beta-blockers are ineffective, contraindicated, or not tolerated, switch to verapamil (starting 40 mg three times daily, maximum 480 mg daily) or diltiazem 1, 2
- Critical warning: Use verapamil cautiously in patients with severe obstruction (≥100 mm Hg) or elevated pulmonary pressures, as it can precipitate pulmonary edema 1
- Monitor closely during initiation in patients with high gradients 1
Third-Line Therapy: Disopyramide
- Add disopyramide (400-600 mg/day) if beta-blockers alone are ineffective 1, 2
- This Class IA antiarrhythmic can abolish basal LVOT gradients and improve exercise tolerance 1
- Monitor QTc interval during dose titration; reduce dose if QTc exceeds 480 ms 1
- Avoid in patients with glaucoma, prostatism, or those taking other QT-prolonging drugs (amiodarone, sotalol) 1
Fourth-Line Therapy: Mavacamten
- Consider mavacamten (cardiac myosin inhibitor) for persistent NYHA class II-III symptoms despite beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers 2
- This represents a novel mechanism targeting the underlying pathophysiology of HCM 4
- Monitor for reversible reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction to <50% (occurs in 7-10% of patients) 5
Critical Medications to AVOID
Absolute Contraindications in Obstructive HCM
- Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (amlodipine, nifedipine, felodipine) - can worsen LVOT obstruction and precipitate hemodynamic collapse 2
- Arterial and venous dilators including nitrates and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors - exacerbate LVOT obstruction 1, 6
- Digoxin - positive inotropic effects worsen obstruction 1
- Alpha-blockers (terazosin, doxazosin) - cause vasodilation leading to hemodynamic compromise 2
- ACE inhibitors and ARBs - uncertain benefit and potentially harmful in patients with resting or provocable LVOT obstruction 2
Diuretic Use Requires Caution
- Use diuretics cautiously at low doses for congestive symptoms only 2
- Aggressive diuresis worsens LVOT obstruction by decreasing preload and reducing ventricular cavity size 6
General Measures and Lifestyle Modifications
Preload Management
- Avoid dehydration and maintain adequate fluid intake, especially during exercise or hot weather 6
- Avoid excess alcohol consumption 1, 6
- Encourage weight loss if obese (present in >70% of adult HCM patients and independently associated with increased symptom burden) 2
Arrhythmia Management
- New-onset or poorly controlled atrial fibrillation exacerbates symptoms due to loss of atrial contribution to ventricular filling 1, 6
- Promptly restore sinus rhythm or achieve appropriate rate control before considering invasive therapies 1
- Patients with HCM are highly dependent on atrial systole for adequate ventricular filling due to impaired ventricular relaxation 6
Septal Reduction Therapy (SRT) Indications
When to Consider SRT
SRT is indicated when patients remain severely symptomatic despite guideline-directed medical therapy with:
- Dynamic LVOT gradient at rest or with physiologic provocation ≥50 mm Hg 2
- Severe dyspnea or chest pain attributable to LVOTO that interferes with everyday activity 2
Surgical Myectomy (Preferred Option)
- Surgical myectomy is the preferred SRT when performed by experienced operators at comprehensive HCM centers 2
- Achieves >90% relief of obstruction with perioperative mortality <1% in most centers 2
- Mandatory for patients requiring concomitant cardiac surgery 2
Consider Earlier Myectomy in Specific Scenarios:
- Severe progressive pulmonary hypertension attributable to LVOTO or associated mitral regurgitation 2
- Left atrial enlargement with ≥1 episodes of symptomatic atrial fibrillation 2
- Poor functional capacity attributable to LVOTO on treadmill testing 2
- Children and young adults with very high resting LVOT gradients (>100 mm Hg) 2
Alcohol Septal Ablation (Alternative Option)
- Reserved for adult patients who remain severely symptomatic despite GDMT when surgery is contraindicated or risk is unacceptable due to serious comorbidities or advanced age 1, 2
- Should not be performed in patients <21 years of age and is discouraged in adults <40 years if myectomy is viable 1
- Uncertain effectiveness in patients with marked septal hypertrophy (>30 mm) 1
SRT Contraindications
- Do not perform SRT in asymptomatic patients with normal exercise tolerance 1, 2
- Do not perform SRT in patients whose symptoms are controlled or minimized on optimal medical therapy 1
Management of Acute Hypotension in HOCM
Emergency Protocol
- Acute hypotension in obstructive HCM is a medical urgency requiring immediate intervention 2
- Prioritize intravenous fluid administration to maximize preload 1, 2
- Use phenylephrine (pure alpha-agonist) as the preferred vasopressor to increase afterload without increasing contractility 1, 2
- Consider vasopressin as an alternative alpha-agonist 1
- Avoid beta-agonists (dopamine, dobutamine) which worsen LVOT obstruction by increasing contractility 2
- Consider intravenous beta-blockade in combination with vasoconstrictors to dampen contractility and improve preload by prolonging diastolic filling 1, 2
- Use intraoperative echocardiography to evaluate LVOT obstruction in the setting of hypotension 1
Special Consideration: The 10% Midwall Fibrosis Finding
Prognostic Implications
- Myocardial fibrosis plays an important role in the progression to advanced heart failure in patients with HCM 7
- Late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI provides better risk evaluation for management strategies 7
- This finding warrants closer monitoring for heart failure progression and arrhythmia risk 7
Does Not Change Initial Management
- The presence of 10% fibrosis does not alter the initial pharmacologic approach 1, 2
- Continue with standard stepwise medical therapy as outlined above 1, 2
- Monitor for development of systolic dysfunction (EF ≤50%) which would require transition to heart failure-directed medical therapy 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never abruptly discontinue beta-blockers - can precipitate rebound tachycardia and worsening symptoms 2
- Never combine beta-blockers with non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers - increased risk of bradycardia and heart block 2
- Never use vasodilators for blood pressure control in patients with obstructive physiology 2, 6
- Never perform dobutamine stress testing to identify latent LVOTO - lacks specificity 6
- Never refer for SRT without first optimizing medical therapy - SRT should only be performed as part of a program dedicated to longitudinal and multidisciplinary care of HCM patients 1