What is the first line of checking for suspected kidney stones?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

First-Line Imaging for Suspected Kidney Stones

Low-dose non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis is the first-line imaging test for suspected kidney stones in most patients, with 97% sensitivity and 95% specificity. 1, 2

Primary Recommendation: Low-Dose Non-Contrast CT

The American College of Radiology assigns non-contrast CT an appropriateness rating of 8 (usually appropriate) for suspected stone disease, making it the gold standard imaging modality. 3 This recommendation is based on several critical advantages:

  • Detects virtually all stones regardless of composition with >95% sensitivity and specificity 3, 1
  • Provides precise stone measurements and exact ureteral location, essential for determining whether conservative management or surgical intervention is needed 3, 1
  • Identifies secondary signs of obstruction including hydronephrosis, perinephric stranding, and ureteral dilation 3, 1
  • Reveals alternative diagnoses if stones are ruled out, unlike older modalities such as intravenous urography 3

Use low-dose protocols (<3 mSv) rather than conventional dosing to minimize radiation exposure while maintaining excellent diagnostic accuracy. 1, 2 If low-dose CT reduces sensitivity, secondary signs and dual-energy CT can clarify findings. 3

Alternative First-Line Imaging in Special Populations

Pregnant Patients

Ultrasound of the kidneys and bladder is the first-line imaging choice in pregnant patients (appropriateness rating of 8), avoiding ionizing radiation to the fetus. 3 However, recognize these limitations:

  • Ultrasound has lower sensitivity for direct stone visualization (24-57%) but excellent sensitivity (up to 100%) for detecting hydronephrosis 1, 2
  • Combining ultrasound with plain radiography (KUB) improves diagnostic accuracy to 79-90% sensitivity, providing an acceptable alternative to CT 3, 1, 2
  • If ultrasound is inconclusive, consider non-contrast MRU, though it has only 69% sensitivity for identifying stone location compared to CT's 100% 3

Recurrent Stone Disease

For patients with known prior stones presenting with recurrent symptoms:

  • Non-contrast CT remains usually appropriate (rating of 7), preferably at reduced doses 3
  • Limit scanning to the bladder or area of interest to minimize cumulative radiation exposure 3, 1, 2
  • Ultrasound (rating of 7) is appropriate for evaluating hydronephrosis in this population 3
  • Large radiopaque stones may appear on KUB radiography (rating of 5), allowing tracking of stone progression 3

What NOT to Use as First-Line Imaging

Plain Radiography (KUB) Alone

Abdominal radiography has an appropriateness rating of only 3 (usually not appropriate) as a standalone test. 3 Its narrow capabilities for visualizing different etiologies of renal colic could lead to repeat imaging, canceling out the benefit of lower radiation exposure. 3

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging is less accurate for identifying stones (rating of 4, may be appropriate) but highly dependable for depicting hydronephrosis and perinephric edema. 3 It should not be used as first-line imaging except when radiation must be avoided and ultrasound is inadequate. 1, 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use contrast-enhanced CT as first-line imaging—enhancing renal parenchyma obscures stones within the collecting system, particularly small stones 1, 2
  • Motion artifact can make stones appear larger than actual size on CT, particularly in obese patients; correlate with KUB and ultrasound when planning surgical approach 4
  • Normal-sized kidneys on ultrasound do not exclude stone disease—focus on detecting hydronephrosis and secondary signs of obstruction 3
  • Ultrasound sensitivity decreases significantly for stones <5 mm; do not rely solely on ultrasound for detecting small calculi 1

When Initial CT is Inconclusive

If non-contrast CT cannot definitively confirm whether a calcification is within the ureter versus an adjacent structure (common mimics include phleboliths or arterial calcifications):

  • Obtain CT with IV contrast to visualize the "soft tissue rim" sign around ureteral stones, confirm iliac arterial calcifications, and detect delayed nephrogram from obstruction 3, 1
  • Alternatively, CT urography (CTU) with urinary tract opacification confirms ureteral location and distinguishes stones from mimics 3

References

Guideline

Diagnosing Kidney Stones with Imaging

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Imaging for Suspected Kidney Stone

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Deceived by a CT Scan: The Case of the Misrepresented Stone Size.

Journal of endourology case reports, 2020

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.