Is Cabenuva (cabotegravir and rilpivirine) appropriate for a patient with HIV who has achieved viral suppression and a CD4 count of 182, and should ibalizumab (Trogarzo) be discontinued?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recommendation for Cabenuva and Ibalizumab in Virologically Suppressed HIV Patient

Approve Cabenuva (cabotegravir/rilpivirine) for this virologically suppressed patient with CD4 count of 182, and immediately discontinue ibalizumab (Trogarzo) as it is only indicated for multidrug-resistant HIV with ongoing virologic failure—continuing this salvage therapy in a patient with complete viral suppression (<20 copies/mL) is clinically inappropriate and wasteful. 1, 2

Rationale for Cabenuva Approval

Eligibility Criteria Met

  • This patient meets all criteria for long-acting injectable therapy: maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (currently <20 copies/mL) for at least 6 months on current regimen without history of virological failure 2, 3
  • No documented resistance to cabotegravir or rilpivirine based on the clinical scenario provided, which is essential for Cabenuva use 2, 4
  • Virologic suppression is the key eligibility criterion, not CD4 count—the CD4 of 182 does not preclude use of Cabenuva 5, 6

Evidence Supporting Use in This Population

  • Long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine maintained viral suppression in 95% of patients at 96 weeks in the FLAIR and ATLAS trials, demonstrating durable efficacy 5, 7
  • Recent real-world data show 80% viral suppression at 48 weeks even in patients starting with viremia, suggesting excellent outcomes in adherent patients who are already suppressed 6
  • The FDA-approved indication specifically includes virologically suppressed adults switching from their current antiretroviral regimen 3

Implementation Algorithm

  • Recommend oral lead-in phase of 4-5 weeks with oral cabotegravir 30mg plus rilpivirine 25mg daily to assess tolerability before committing to long-acting injections 2, 3
  • Check HIV RNA at 4-6 weeks after starting oral lead-in to confirm maintained viral suppression 2
  • If oral lead-in successful, proceed to long-acting injections: cabotegravir 400mg plus rilpivirine 600mg intramuscularly every 4 weeks initially, with option to extend to every 8 weeks after establishing tolerance 2, 3
  • Monitor HIV RNA every 3 months for the first year after switching to long-acting therapy 2

Critical Caveats

  • Risk of virologic failure with resistance is 1-2% even with perfect adherence, and when failure occurs, 75% develop rilpivirine resistance and 60% develop integrase inhibitor resistance 2
  • Patient must be able to attend scheduled injections reliably—poor injection adherence is a risk factor for virologic failure 2
  • Injection site reactions occur in 88% of patients but are typically grade 1-2, lasting median 3 days, and rarely lead to discontinuation 5

Rationale for Ibalizumab Discontinuation

Indication Mismatch

  • Ibalizumab is indicated exclusively for heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection failing their current antiretroviral regimen 1
  • The FDA approval was based on patients with virologic failure from multidrug-resistant HIV, where almost 50% achieved undetectable HIV RNA at 24 weeks when ibalizumab was combined with at least one other active drug 1
  • This patient has the opposite clinical scenario: complete viral suppression with undetectable viral load (<20 copies/mL), making ibalizumab use inappropriate 1

Clinical and Economic Considerations

  • Ibalizumab is a salvage therapy reserved for patients with limited treatment options due to extensive resistance 1
  • Continuing expensive salvage medication in a virologically suppressed patient with no evidence of resistance is not evidence-based and represents poor stewardship of resources 1
  • The patient's current viral suppression indicates their regimen is working—there is no clinical rationale for maintaining a drug designed for treatment failure 1

Quality of Life and Morbidity Considerations

Benefits of Switching to Cabenuva

  • Reduced pill burden from daily oral tablets to 6 injections per year (if using every 8-week dosing) improves quality of life 2
  • Potential metabolic benefits including reduction in NRTI-related bone, kidney, and cardiovascular complications by eliminating daily oral NRTIs 2
  • Maintains durable virological suppression with 95% suppression rates in clinical trials, prioritizing the key outcome of preventing HIV-related morbidity and mortality 2

Monitoring for Low CD4 Count

  • CD4 count of 182 requires continued monitoring every 6 months until above 250/μL for at least 1 year with concomitant viral suppression 1
  • The low CD4 count does not contraindicate Cabenuva but does require attention to opportunistic infection prophylaxis per standard guidelines 1

Certification Recommendations

Recommend Certification:

  • J0741 (cabotegravir injection)
  • 96372 (therapeutic injection, subcutaneous or intramuscular)
  • 96365 (intravenous infusion, for therapy, prophylaxis, or diagnosis, initial)
  • J0742 (rilpivirine injection)

Recommend Non-Certification:

  • J1746 (ibalizumab injection) - inappropriate for virologically suppressed patient without multidrug resistance 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Managing Drug Interactions in HIV Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Cabenuva Contraindications and Alternative Treatments

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Viral Suppression Rates at 48 Weeks in People With HIV Starting Long-Acting Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine With Initial Viremia.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2025

Related Questions

What is the frequency of CD4 (Cluster of Differentiation 4) count and viral load monitoring in a patient with undetectable Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) on Cabenuva (cabotegravir and rilpivirine)?
Is Cabenuva (cabotegravir/rilpivirine) 600/900mg intramuscularly (IM) every 8 weeks medically indicated for a patient with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and a history of Biktarvy (bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide) and Juluca (dolutegravir/rilpivirine) to maintain a suppressed, undetectable viral load?
Can a patient with HIV who is resistant to rilpivirine (Edurant) take Cabenuva (cabotegravir/rilpivirine)?
What are the risks and management strategies for creatine kinase (CK) elevation associated with Cabenuva (cabotegravir and rilpivirine)?
Is cabotegravir-rilpivirine (Intramuscular suspension, extended release) medically indicated for the treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in patients with diagnosis code B20?
What is the recommended management for a patient already on meropenem (Merrem) and metronidazole (Flagyl)?
What is the relationship between intrapulmonary shunt and hypoxemia?
What is the best antibiotic for a tooth infection?
Is continued inpatient stay considered medically necessary for a patient after left 1st rib resection and brachial plexus neurolysis with minimal clinical improvement despite outreach?
What are the possible causes of thrombocytosis in a patient recently treated for Klebsiella septicemia with IV ceftriaxone (Ceftriaxone) followed by oral Augmentin (Amoxicillin-Clavulanate) with normal hemoglobin (Hb) and total white blood cell count (TWBC)?
What is the next antibiotic to use for a 16-year-old girl with a sinus infection who failed a 10-day course of amoxicillin (amoxicillin)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.