Are biopsy of the tear sac, probing of the nasolacrimal duct, and nasal/sinus endoscopy medically necessary for a patient with left nasolacrimal duct obstruction?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Medical Necessity Assessment for Proposed Procedures in Left Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Direct Answer

The lacrimal sac biopsy (68525) and nasal/sinus endoscopy (31239) are medically necessary for this patient, while the probing of the nasolacrimal duct (68815) is a standard component of the planned endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) procedure.

Rationale for Lacrimal Sac Biopsy (68525)

Routine lacrimal sac biopsy during DCR is recommended to exclude malignancy and systemic disease, even in patients without specific preoperative clinical or radiological findings suggesting abnormality. 1, 2

Evidence Supporting Biopsy

  • In a prospective study of 205 consecutive patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction, pathologic examination revealed unexpected findings in 3 patients (1.5%), including basosquamous cell carcinoma, lymphoproliferative disease, and granulomatous inflammation, despite no preoperative suspicion 2

  • A separate study of 50 patients undergoing endoscopic DCR found that routine biopsy detected neoplasm in 2% of cases and granuloma in 8% of cases, conditions that would have been missed without routine tissue sampling 1

  • The key clinical principle is that malignant or systemic disease can occur in patients with neither specific history nor clinical or radiological findings, making routine biopsy a critical safety measure 2

Histopathologic Findings Guide Management

  • Beyond excluding malignancy, biopsy provides diagnostic information about the underlying pathology: chronic inflammation (66-87% of cases), chronic dacryocystitis (18%), granulomatous disease (8%), rhinoscleroma (4%), and dacryoliths 1, 2

  • The severity of chronic inflammatory state (CIS) scoring from biopsy specimens helps predict surgical outcomes and may guide postoperative management 1

Rationale for Nasal/Sinus Endoscopy (31239)

Nasal endoscopy is essential for pre-surgical planning in DCR procedures as it allows direct visualization of the nasal cavity anatomy, identifies concurrent sinonasal pathology, and confirms the surgical approach. 3

Pre-Surgical Planning Necessity

  • Endoscopy is standard of care for evaluating the lateral nasal wall anatomy, middle meatus patency, and identifying anatomical variations (septal deviation, turbinate hypertrophy, polyps) that could affect surgical success 3

  • The procedure improves diagnostic accuracy by 69.1-85% compared to anterior rhinoscopy alone, with specificities up to 95% for identifying pathology in the ostiomeatal complex 3

  • Endoscopic assessment identifies concurrent sinonasal disease requiring treatment: chronic rhinosinusitis guidelines recommend endoscopy to document inflammation (mucosal edema, purulent discharge, polyps) that may contribute to lacrimal drainage dysfunction 4

Anatomical Assessment Requirements

  • The endoscope allows visualization of the planned surgical site on the lateral nasal wall where the osteotomy will be created, identifying potential obstacles such as concha bullosa, paradoxical middle turbinate, or Haller cells 4

  • Assessment of the inferior meatus and middle meatus patency is critical, as synechiae or scarring from previous procedures can complicate DCR surgery 4

Rationale for Probing with Crawford Tube Placement (68815)

Probing of the nasolacrimal duct with intubation is an integral component of endoscopic DCR and is medically necessary to establish and maintain patency of the newly created drainage pathway. 5, 6

Role in Endoscopic DCR

  • In adult acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction with complete distal blockage (as documented in this patient), probing serves multiple functions: confirms the level of obstruction, guides the surgical approach, and facilitates stent placement 5, 6

  • An obstruction-based approach to nasolacrimal surgery allows intraoperative evaluation to predict treatment success and select the most appropriate intervention, rather than a stepwise age-based approach 6

  • Crawford tube (bicanalicular silicone intubation) placement maintains the surgical ostium patency during healing and prevents premature closure, which is particularly important in cases of complete distal obstruction 5

Evidence for Combined Approach

  • Sheath-guided dacryoendoscopic probing enables minimally invasive assessment of the duct pathology and facilitates biopsy of recurrent lesions when needed 5

  • The probing component is not a separate procedure but rather an essential step in the planned endoscopic DCR with intubation 6

Clinical Context and Risk Assessment

Patient-Specific Factors

This patient presents with:

  • Chronic symptoms lasting years with progressive worsening (epiphora with tears running down cheeks)
  • Physical examination findings of lacrimal sac swelling (suggesting chronic dacryocystitis)
  • Complete distal nasolacrimal duct obstruction documented on examination

Risks of Denying Procedures

  • Failure to perform lacrimal sac biopsy carries the risk of missing occult malignancy (1.5-2% incidence) or systemic disease requiring different management 1, 2

  • Proceeding with DCR without nasal endoscopy risks surgical complications from unidentified anatomical variations or concurrent sinonasal pathology that could compromise surgical success 3

  • Omitting probing and intubation in complete distal obstruction significantly increases the risk of surgical failure and need for revision procedures 6

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not deny lacrimal sac biopsy based on absence of preoperative suspicion of malignancy, as unexpected pathology occurs in 1.5-2% of cases with no clinical warning signs 2

  • Do not consider nasal endoscopy optional for DCR planning; it is standard of care and cannot be adequately replaced by anterior rhinoscopy 3

  • Recognize that probing with intubation is not a standalone procedure but an integral component of endoscopic DCR for complete distal obstruction 6

  • Avoid applying pediatric congenital NLDO treatment algorithms to adult acquired NLDO, as these represent different disease entities with different treatment approaches 7, 6

References

Guideline

Medical Necessity Determination for Nasal Endoscopy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.