Does Amlodipine Control Heart Rate?
No, amlodipine does not control heart rate—it is a blood pressure medication that has minimal to no direct effect on heart rate, unlike beta-blockers or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers. 1, 2
Mechanism and Pharmacologic Properties
Amlodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker that selectively acts on vascular smooth muscle rather than cardiac tissue. 2
- Amlodipine does not change sinoatrial nodal function or atrioventricular conduction in intact animals or humans, according to FDA labeling. 2
- The drug has minimal direct effects on cardiac contractility, AV conduction, and heart rate, which distinguishes it from non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers like verapamil or diltiazem. 1
- Within therapeutic dosing, chronic oral administration does not lead to clinically significant changes in heart rate in normotensive patients with angina or hypertensive patients. 2
Clinical Evidence on Heart Rate Effects
Multiple high-quality studies consistently demonstrate amlodipine's lack of heart rate effect:
- In a 24-hour ambulatory monitoring study, amlodipine significantly lowered blood pressure (-12.7/-5.6 mmHg) without changing the 24-hour average heart rate, while nifedipine retard increased heart rate by 3.3 bpm. 3
- An 11-month hemodynamic study showed amlodipine reduced mean arterial pressure by 14% with no significant changes in heart rate at rest or during graded exercise (50W, 100W, 150W). 4
- Amlodipine lowers blood pressure without increasing sympathetic activity or activating the renin-angiotensin system, explaining the absence of reflex tachycardia. 5
- In coronary artery disease patients receiving IV amlodipine, heart rate increased acutely (likely due to rapid vasodilation), but chronic oral dosing does not produce this effect. 6
Autonomic Nervous System Effects
Amlodipine does not alter autonomic balance, unlike shorter-acting dihydropyridines:
- Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability showed amlodipine did not change the high-frequency component (parasympathetic activity) or the LF/HF ratio (sympathovagal balance). 3
- In contrast, nifedipine retard decreased parasympathetic activity and increased sympathetic activity with reflex tachycardia. 3
- Plasma noradrenaline levels and renin activity remain unchanged during amlodipine treatment, confirming the absence of sympathetic activation. 5
Clinical Implications for Heart Rate Control
When heart rate control is a primary treatment goal, amlodipine is not the appropriate choice:
- Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem) or beta-blockers should be selected when heart rate reduction is needed. 1
- The lack of heart rate effects with amlodipine may be advantageous in patients where heart rate reduction is not desired or could be harmful. 1
- Combination therapy with a beta-blocker can be used when both blood pressure control and heart rate reduction are required. 1
Comparative Trial Data
In major cardiovascular outcome trials, amlodipine's lack of heart rate effect did not compromise its efficacy:
- The ASCOT trial showed amlodipine-based therapy was superior to atenolol-based therapy in reducing stroke (25% reduction, P=0.017) and mortality, despite atenolol's heart rate-lowering effects. 7
- The ALLHAT trial found no differences in primary cardiovascular outcomes between amlodipine, lisinopril, and chlorthalidone, with amlodipine showing consistent results across all patient subgroups. 7
- In the ACCOMPLISH trial, benazepril plus amlodipine reduced cardiovascular events compared to benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide (HR 0.80, P<0.001). 7
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not prescribe amlodipine expecting heart rate control—it is purely a vasodilator without chronotropic effects. 1, 2
- Do not confuse dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (amlodipine) with non-dihydropyridines (verapamil, diltiazem), which do reduce heart rate and should be avoided in heart failure. 7
- In patients with heart failure, amlodipine can be safely used for blood pressure control without worsening outcomes, but it neither improves nor worsens survival. 7