What is the recommended Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) range to maintain?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Mean Arterial Pressure Target in Critically Ill Patients

For most critically ill patients, maintain a MAP of ≥65 mmHg as the initial target, with specific adjustments to 70-85 mmHg for patients with chronic hypertension, spinal cord injury, or elevated compartment pressures. 1, 2

Standard MAP Target: 65 mmHg

  • The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines establish MAP ≥65 mmHg as the initial vasopressor target for septic shock patients 1
  • This 65 mmHg threshold represents the critical point below which organ autoregulation fails and blood flow becomes linearly dependent on arterial pressure 2
  • The 2024 AHA/ACC perioperative guidelines recommend maintaining intraoperative MAP ≥60-65 mmHg or SBP >90 mmHg, noting that harm thresholds appear around MAP <65 mmHg maintained for approximately 15 minutes 1
  • In acute meningitis and meningococcal sepsis, a MAP ≥65 mmHg is recommended, though this may need individualization based on age and clinical presentation 1

Elevated MAP Targets for Specific Populations

Chronic Hypertension (Target: 70-85 mmHg)

  • Patients with chronic hypertension require MAP targets of 70-85 mmHg due to rightward shift of their autoregulation curve 2, 3
  • A study in septic shock patients with hypertension found that MAP 72-82 mmHg was necessary to prevent acute kidney injury in those with initial renal impairment 4
  • Higher MAP targets (80-85 mmHg) in chronically hypertensive patients minimize renal injury but increase arrhythmia risk 3

Spinal Cord Injury (Target: ≥70 mmHg)

  • French guidelines recommend maintaining MAP ≥70 mmHg during the first week after spinal cord injury to limit neurological deficit worsening 1
  • This recommendation is based on correlation between MAP >70-75 mmHg and neurological improvement, with optimal spinal perfusion pressure >50 mmHg requiring MAP >70 mmHg 1
  • Continuous arterial catheter monitoring is recommended as MAP falls below target 25% of the time 1

Elevated Compartment Pressures (Target: MAP = Desired Perfusion Pressure + Compartment Pressure)

  • When venous or compartment pressures are elevated, increase MAP targets to compensate for reduced organ perfusion pressure 1, 2
  • The 2024 POQI consensus recommends adding the estimated compartment pressure to the desired perfusion pressure (e.g., if targeting 65 mmHg perfusion with 15 mmHg intra-abdominal pressure, maintain MAP ≥80 mmHg) 1
  • This is particularly critical in abdominal compartment syndrome, steep Trendelenburg positioning, or peritoneal insufflation 1, 2

Calculating True Perfusion Pressure

  • MAP alone does not reflect actual organ perfusion pressure—calculate trans-organ perfusion pressure as MAP minus central venous pressure (CVP) 2
  • Trans-kidney perfusion pressure (TKPP = MAP - CVP) should exceed 60 mmHg in heart failure and fluid-overloaded patients 2
  • Elevated CVP from venous congestion critically reduces net perfusion pressure independent of cardiac output 2

Monitoring Beyond MAP

MAP is necessary but insufficient for assessing adequate perfusion—monitor these concurrent parameters: 2

  • Urine output (goal >0.5 mL/kg/h) 2
  • Lactate clearance 2
  • Mental status 2
  • Skin perfusion and capillary refill 2
  • Creatinine trends 2

Evidence Limitations and Practical Application

  • The POISE-3 trial randomized 7,490 patients to MAP ≥80 mmHg versus ≥60 mmHg strategies and found no benefit from higher targets, though interpretation is complicated by lack of detail on time spent in the harmful 55-70 mmHg range 1
  • A 2022 meta-analysis of 6 RCTs (3,753 patients) found no mortality difference between standard (60-70 mmHg) and high (≥70 mmHg) MAP targets in general critically ill populations 5
  • Despite equivocal trial evidence, observational data consistently shows harm below MAP 65 mmHg, making this the safest initial target 1, 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume MAP 65 mmHg is adequate for all patients—chronic hypertension, spinal cord injury, and elevated compartment pressures require higher targets 1, 2, 3
  • Do not use MAP as the sole endpoint—blood pressure alone does not reflect cardiac output or tissue perfusion 2
  • Do not ignore CVP when available—elevated venous pressure reduces actual perfusion pressure even with adequate MAP 2
  • Do not target supranormal MAP (>85 mmHg) without specific indication—this increases vasopressor requirements and arrhythmia risk without proven benefit 2, 3

Practical Algorithm

  1. Start with MAP ≥65 mmHg for all patients 1, 2
  2. Increase target to 70-85 mmHg if: 1, 2, 3
    • Documented chronic hypertension
    • Spinal cord injury (first 7 days)
    • Elevated intra-abdominal pressure >12 mmHg
  3. Calculate TKPP (MAP - CVP) and ensure >60 mmHg in heart failure or fluid overload 2
  4. Titrate MAP up or down based on organ function markers (urine output, lactate, mental status) rather than fixed targets alone 2, 3
  5. Use norepinephrine as first-line vasopressor to achieve MAP targets 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Perfusion Windows in Shock

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Personalizing blood pressure management in septic shock.

Annals of intensive care, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.