What is the appropriate evaluation and management for a 20-year-old female presenting with flank pain?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Evaluation and Management of Flank Pain in a 20-Year-Old Female

Non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis is the imaging study of choice for evaluating flank pain in this patient, with 98-100% sensitivity and specificity for detecting urinary stones and identifying alternative diagnoses. 1

Initial Clinical Assessment

The diagnostic approach must first distinguish between renal colic and other causes based on specific pain characteristics:

  • Classic renal colic presents as colicky, wave-like severe pain that is independent of body position, radiating into the groin or genitals with abrupt onset 2, 1
  • Pain that worsens after prolonged static positioning or with external flank pressure suggests musculoskeletal origin (paraspinal muscles, facet joints) rather than stone disease 1, 3
  • Pain that significantly worsens with external pressure indicates pyelonephritis, kidney infection, or perinephric abscess rather than nephrolithiasis 4

Critical Red Flags Requiring Urgent Evaluation

  • Fever, chills, or signs of systemic infection 1
  • Inability to urinate or decreased urine output 1
  • Visible blood in urine 1
  • Vital signs showing shock or hemodynamic instability 2

Diagnostic Workup

Urinalysis

  • Hematuria (even microscopic) shifts probability toward stone disease 1
  • Absence of pyuria essentially excludes urinary tract infection with excellent negative predictive value 3
  • Unremarkable urinalysis excludes most significant renal pathology 3

Imaging Selection

Non-contrast CT abdomen/pelvis is the gold standard with the following advantages 1, 5, 6:

  • 98-100% sensitivity and specificity for stones regardless of size, location, or composition
  • Detects stones as small as 1-2mm
  • Identifies extraurinary causes in approximately one-third of patients 1, 5
  • No contrast agent needed, avoiding nephrotoxicity and allergic reactions
  • Completed within 5 minutes

Ultrasound is first-line only if the patient is pregnant to avoid radiation exposure 1. However, ultrasound has significant limitations:

  • Only 72% sensitive for large stones (>5mm) in proximal ureter 1
  • 29% sensitive overall for stones of any size 1
  • Absence of hydronephrosis makes larger ureteral stones (>5mm) less likely, with ultrasound being up to 100% sensitive for hydronephrosis 1

Alternative Diagnoses to Consider in Young Females

Given the patient's age and sex, the differential extends beyond urolithiasis:

Gynecologic Causes

  • Benign adnexal masses 1, 3
  • Pelvic congestion syndrome 1, 3
  • Ectopic pregnancy if delayed menses 2

Gastrointestinal Causes

  • Right colonic diverticulitis 1, 3
  • Gastroenteritis and colitis 1, 3
  • Inflammatory bowel disease 1, 3

Other Urinary Tract Pathology

  • Spontaneous ureteral rupture (presents with sudden onset abdominal/flank pain) 7
  • Page kidney from subcapsular hematoma causing secondary hypertension 8

Management Based on Imaging Results

If Stone Disease Confirmed

  • Stones <5mm typically pass spontaneously 1
  • Larger stones or those causing complete obstruction may require endoscopic removal 1
  • Instruct patient to maintain high fluid intake and strain urine to catch stones 2
  • Provide rapid analgesia (diclofenac intramuscular injection preferred) within 30 minutes 2

If No Stone Identified

  • Only 14% require hospitalization and 4% undergo surgical intervention when no CT diagnosis is made 1
  • Consider musculoskeletal evaluation with physical examination focusing on costovertebral angle tenderness, spinal range of motion, and paraspinal muscle tenderness 3
  • Evaluate retroperitoneal processes if imaging pursued 3

If Alternative Diagnosis Found

  • 41% require hospitalization and 22% undergo surgical or image-guided intervention when non-appendiceal CT diagnosis is made 1
  • Management directed at specific diagnosis identified

Follow-Up Protocol

  • Telephone follow-up 1 hour after initial assessment and analgesia administration 2
  • Fast-track radiology within 7 days if managed outpatient 2
  • Urgent urology appointment within 7-14 days if calculus identified requiring intervention 2
  • Failure of analgesia after 1 hour mandates immediate hospital admission 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume all flank pain is kidney-related—positional nature of symptoms is key to distinguishing musculoskeletal from renal causes 1
  • Do not rely on plain radiography (KUB), which is only 29% sensitive overall for stones 1
  • Do not delay imaging in young females—consider gynecologic causes that may require urgent intervention 2
  • Do not miss ectopic pregnancy in women with delayed menses presenting with flank pain 2

References

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Flank Pain

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Flank Pain and Frothy Urine

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Nephrolithiasis Pain and Flank Pressure

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Acute flank pain: a modern approach to diagnosis and management.

Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR, 1999

Research

Spontaneous ureteral rupture and review of the literature.

The American journal of emergency medicine, 2014

Research

Flank pain and hematuria is not always a kidney stone.

The American journal of emergency medicine, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.