What is the efficacy of actinium-225 (Ac-225) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Actinium-225 PSMA Radioligand Therapy for mCRPC

Actinium-225 PSMA radioligand therapy demonstrates substantial efficacy in heavily pre-treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, with 63-66% of patients achieving >50% PSA decline and median overall survival of 12.7-15.5 months, though it remains an evolving therapy not yet included in major treatment guidelines. 1, 2, 3

Current Guideline Status

  • Actinium-225 is mentioned only as an emerging theranostic approach in ESMO 2020 guidelines, positioned alongside lutetium-177 as PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals for PSMA-positive tumors, but without specific treatment recommendations. 4

  • The AUA guidelines (2015) and other major society guidelines do not include actinium-225, as these predate its clinical use. 4

  • Current guidelines emphasize lutetium-177 PSMA-617 as the established PSMA-targeted therapy after taxane chemotherapy and androgen receptor axis inhibitors. 5

Biochemical Response Efficacy

  • Any PSA decline occurs in 81-85% of patients, demonstrating broad biochemical activity even in heavily pre-treated populations. 6, 2, 3

  • PSA reduction >50% is achieved in 60-66% of patients, which represents a clinically meaningful response threshold. 6, 2, 3

  • The molecular response rate on PSMA PET imaging is 71%, though 50% of patients showed disease progression after the first cycle in one series of advanced-stage patients. 2, 7

Survival Outcomes

  • Median overall survival ranges from 12.7 to 15.5 months across the largest studies, with the most robust data from the WARMTH Act study (n=488) showing 15.5 months median OS. 1, 2, 3

  • Median progression-free survival is 7.9-11.0 months, providing meaningful disease control in this heavily pre-treated population. 1, 2, 3

  • Radioligand-naïve patients have significantly better outcomes compared to those previously treated with lutetium-177 PSMA (pooled HR 0.22), suggesting earlier use may be more beneficial. 6

Patient Selection Criteria

  • Actinium-225 is primarily used in patients who have exhausted standard therapies, including docetaxel (66%), cabazitaxel (21%), abiraterone (39%), enzalutamide (39%), and often lutetium-177 PSMA (32%). 1

  • PSMA-positive disease on theranostic imaging is required for patient selection, following the same principle as lutetium-177 therapy. 4

  • Patients should have metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with adequate performance status to tolerate therapy. 1

Treatment Protocol

  • Standard dosing is 8 MBq administered intravenously, with most patients receiving 2-4 cycles (median 2 cycles). 1

  • Cycles are typically administered every 8-13 weeks, with longer intervals than lutetium-177 due to the longer half-life and more potent alpha emission. 1, 7

  • The median interval between cycles in clinical practice is 13 weeks (range 8-28 weeks). 7

Safety Profile and Toxicity

Xerostomia (Dry Mouth)

  • Xerostomia is the most common adverse effect, occurring in 63.5-84% of patients, with universal occurrence in those receiving >7 cycles. 1, 2, 3

  • Most xerostomia is grade 1-2, though it represents a significant quality of life consideration. 6

  • Parotid gland SUVmax decreases by 33% on imaging, reflecting salivary gland damage. 7

Hematologic Toxicity

  • Grade ≥3 anemia occurs in 9-13% of patients, which is manageable but requires monitoring. 1, 3

  • Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia occurs in 5-7% and grade ≥3 leukopenia in 4% of patients. 1, 3

  • Overall hematologic toxicity rates are lower than expected given the heavily pre-treated nature of these patients. 6

Renal Toxicity

  • Grade ≥3 nephrotoxicity occurs in 4-5% of patients, representing a relatively low rate of severe kidney injury. 1, 3

  • No treatment-related deaths have been reported in the major series. 1

Advantages Over Beta-Emitters

  • Alpha particles from actinium-225 have higher linear energy transfer and shorter range (50-80 micrometers) compared to beta-emitters like lutetium-177, theoretically providing more potent tumor cell killing with less bone marrow toxicity. 6

  • The shorter range of alpha emission allows more targeted delivery to tumor cells while sparing surrounding normal tissue. 6

Critical Clinical Considerations

  • Actinium-225 shows efficacy even in lutetium-177-refractory patients, making it a viable salvage option when PSMA-targeted beta therapy fails. 7

  • The disease control rate is approximately 50% after the first cycle in advanced-stage patients. 7

  • This therapy is currently used in clinical practice at specialized centers but lacks FDA approval and formal guideline inclusion, limiting widespread availability. 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not overlook xerostomia counseling - patients must understand this is nearly universal and can significantly impact quality of life, especially with multiple cycles. 1, 2, 3

  • Ensure adequate bone marrow reserve before initiating therapy, as patients are typically heavily pre-treated with chemotherapy. 1

  • Monitor renal function closely given the 4-5% risk of grade ≥3 nephrotoxicity. 1, 3

  • Consider earlier use in the treatment sequence rather than waiting until all other options are exhausted, given the better outcomes in radioligand-naïve patients. 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.