Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
For patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, CABG is superior to both PCI and medical therapy alone, particularly in those with diabetes and higher coronary complexity, and should be the preferred revascularization strategy in surgically eligible patients. 1
Initial Treatment Strategy
Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) Foundation
All patients with multivessel CAD require comprehensive medical therapy regardless of whether revascularization is pursued:
- Antiplatelet therapy: Aspirin 75-100 mg daily long-term is mandatory 1
- High-intensity statin therapy: Target LDL <70 mg/dL for very high-risk patients 1, 2
- ACE inhibitors or ARBs: Recommended for patients with hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, or those at very high cardiovascular risk 1
- Beta-blockers: Should be considered, particularly if administered within 1 year after acute MI, though evidence for prognostic benefit in stable CAD without prior MI is limited 1
- Low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg daily): Should be considered to reduce MI, stroke, and need for revascularization 1
Critical caveat: OMT significantly reduces 10-year mortality (HR 0.55) and major cardiovascular events (HR 0.635) after revascularization, with the impact being more pronounced after PCI than CABG 3. Discontinuation of OMT, particularly statins and ACE inhibitors/ARBs, is associated with increased late adverse events 4.
Revascularization Decision-Making
CABG vs. PCI Selection
CABG is the first-choice revascularization strategy for multivessel disease in surgically eligible patients because:
- Meta-analytical evidence demonstrates survival benefit for CABG over medical therapy in patients with left main disease and three-vessel disease, particularly with LV dysfunction 1
- CABG is superior to PCI in multivessel disease, especially in diabetic patients and those with higher coronary complexity 1
- The survival advantage is related to prevention of MI 1
When PCI May Be Considered
PCI can be considered in multivessel disease when:
- Patient has prohibitive surgical risk or severe comorbidities 1
- Coronary anatomy is less complex (lower SYNTAX score) 1
- Patient preference after informed discussion of risks and benefits 1
Important note: If PCI is chosen, complete revascularization should be pursued based on clinical status, comorbidities, and disease severity 1. However, the strategy (ad hoc culprit-lesion only vs. multivessel PCI vs. staged approach) should be individualized based on SYNTAX score and clinical presentation 1.
Symptom Management Strategy
Antianginal Therapy Algorithm
For patients with persistent angina despite OMT:
First-line options (choose based on patient profile):
- Beta-blockers: Target resting heart rate 55-60 bpm; preferred if hypertension, prior MI, or HFrEF 1
- Calcium channel blockers (CCBs): Preferred if vasospastic component, contraindication to beta-blockers, or COPD 1
- Combination of beta-blocker and CCB can be used if monotherapy insufficient 1
Second-line agents (add if first-line inadequate):
- Long-acting nitrates, ivabradine, nicorandil, ranolazine, or trimetazidine can be added to beta-blocker/CCB or used as part of initial combination therapy 1
Critical reassessment point: Response to antianginal therapy must be reassessed, and treatment adapted if adequate angina control is not achieved or if poorly tolerated 1.
Timing of Revascularization
Conservative vs. Early Invasive Strategy
Initial conservative medical management is generally preferred for stable multivessel CAD without high-risk features, based on the ISCHEMIA trial showing no significant benefit of routine early revascularization over optimal medical therapy alone for up to 5 years 1.
However, revascularization should be pursued when:
- Moderate or severe angina persists despite optimal antianginal therapy (ORBITA 2 demonstrated better angina symptom scores with PCI) 1
- Patient has left main disease or LVEF <35% (clear survival benefit with CABG) 1
- Extensive ischemia with severe symptoms despite medical therapy 1
Acute Coronary Syndrome Context
If multivessel CAD presents as NSTE-ACS:
- Early invasive strategy (<24 hours): Required if high-risk criteria present (ongoing ischemia, hemodynamic instability, depressed LV function) 1
- Invasive strategy (<72 hours): Indicated for intermediate-risk criteria or recurrent symptoms 1
- Revascularization strategy during acute presentation should be based on clinical status, comorbidities, and disease severity (SYNTAX score) 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not withhold OMT while awaiting revascularization: All components should be initiated immediately 1, 3
- Do not assume PCI and CABG are equivalent: CABG provides superior outcomes in multivessel disease, particularly with diabetes or high complexity 1
- Do not neglect symptom improvement: While ISCHEMIA showed no mortality benefit, patients experienced significantly lower spontaneous MI rates and greater angina-related health status improvement with revascularization 1
- Do not discontinue medications post-revascularization: One-third of patients fail to receive optimal secondary prevention, and discontinuation is associated with worse outcomes 5, 4