What is the pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pathogenesis of Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis is a B-cell mediated autoimmune disorder where pathogenic autoantibodies attack postsynaptic components of the neuromuscular junction, primarily acetylcholine receptors, leading to impaired neuromuscular transmission and characteristic fatigable muscle weakness. 1

Autoimmune Mechanism

The fundamental pathogenic process involves autoantibodies targeting critical components of the neuromuscular junction:

  • Acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies are the primary culprit, found in nearly all patients with generalized myasthenia gravis and in 40-77% of patients with ocular myasthenia gravis 2, 1
  • These antibodies are predominantly IgG1 and IgG3 subtypes that produce complement-mediated damage to the postsynaptic membrane 3
  • The antibodies increase the rate of AChR turnover, causing progressive loss of acetylcholine receptors from the postsynaptic membrane 3

Neuromuscular Junction Disruption

The normal physiology is disrupted through specific mechanisms:

  • Acetylcholine is released at the neuromuscular junction during an action potential and migrates across the synapse to reach striated muscle 2, 1
  • Autoantibodies prevent proper nerve signal transmission by blocking, degrading, or destroying acetylcholine receptors 1, 3
  • This results in failed neuromuscular transmission despite normal acetylcholine release from the presynaptic terminal 4, 3

Alternative Antibody Targets

In patients without AChR antibodies (approximately 15-20% of cases), other pathogenic antibodies exist:

  • Muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) antibodies are found in approximately 30% of AChR-negative patients 5, 6
  • MuSK antibodies are predominantly IgG4 subtype and cause disassembly of the neuromuscular junction by disrupting MuSK's physiological role in synapse maintenance 3
  • LRP4 antibodies (against low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4) have been identified as another cause in some seronegative patients 4, 6
  • These antibodies disrupt the MuSK signaling complex required for development and maintenance of the postsynaptic membrane 4, 5

Selective Muscle Vulnerability

Extraocular muscles show particular susceptibility to this pathogenic process:

  • Twitch fibers in extraocular muscles are especially vulnerable to fatigue 2, 1
  • These muscles have fewer acetylcholine receptors compared to other skeletal muscles, making them more susceptible to antibody-mediated receptor loss 2, 7
  • This explains why ocular symptoms (ptosis, diplopia, variable strabismus) are often the first manifestations, occurring in 50% of patients initially 1, 8

Role of the Thymus

The thymus gland plays a central role in disease pathogenesis:

  • The thymus is involved in the failure of immune tolerance to the AChR 9, 3
  • Thymoma is present in approximately 10-20% of patients and represents a significant risk factor 8, 6
  • Thymectomy can substantially reduce clinical symptoms, particularly in specific age-based and immune-based patient subgroups 2

Clinical Consequences of Pathogenic Mechanisms

The antibody-mediated damage produces characteristic clinical features:

  • Fluctuating weakness results from variable degrees of neuromuscular junction impairment that worsen with continued activity as remaining functional receptors become exhausted 1, 7
  • Fatiguability occurs because repetitive nerve stimulation depletes the already reduced safety margin for neuromuscular transmission 7, 8
  • Proximal muscles are affected more than distal muscles due to differences in neuromuscular junction density and receptor reserve 7, 8

Disease Subtypes Based on Pathogenesis

Different antibody patterns create distinct disease subgroups with varying pathogenic mechanisms:

  • AChR-positive MG involves complement-mediated destruction and accelerated receptor degradation 3
  • MuSK-positive MG involves functional disruption of synapse maintenance without complement activation 5, 3
  • LRP4-positive MG disrupts the agrin-LRP4-MuSK signaling pathway essential for postsynaptic differentiation 4, 6
  • Seronegative MG may involve antibodies to other unidentified neuromuscular junction components or low-titer antibodies below detection thresholds 6, 9

Critical Pathogenic Pitfall

The most dangerous consequence of this pathogenic process is respiratory muscle involvement, where antibody-mediated loss of neuromuscular transmission in respiratory muscles can rapidly progress to life-threatening respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support 1, 7, 8

References

Guideline

Myasthenia Gravis: An Autoimmune Neuromuscular Junction Disorder

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Mouse models of myasthenia gravis.

Current pharmaceutical design, 2015

Research

Myasthenia gravis induced by autoantibodies against MuSK.

Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology, 2007

Guideline

Clinical Manifestations of Myasthenia Gravis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Clinical Features and Classification of Myasthenia Gravis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.