What are the etiology and ECG (electrocardiogram) findings of Left Anterior Fascicular Block (LAFB)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Left Anterior Fascicular Block (LAFB): Etiology and ECG Findings

ECG Diagnostic Criteria

The diagnosis of LAFB requires four mandatory electrocardiographic criteria: left axis deviation between -45° and -90°, qR pattern in lead aVL, R-peak time in aVL ≥45 ms, and QRS duration <120 ms. 1, 2

Specific ECG Features

Axis and Morphology:

  • Frontal plane QRS axis must be between -45° and -90° 1, 2
  • Characteristic qR pattern in lead aVL is required 1, 2
  • R-peak time (intrinsicoid deflection) in aVL must be ≥45 ms 1, 2
  • QRS duration remains <120 ms, distinguishing it from complete bundle branch block 1, 2

Vector Changes:

  • The QRS vector shifts posteriorly and superiorly, producing larger R waves in leads I and aVL 1, 3
  • Smaller R waves but deeper S waves appear in leads V5 and V6 1, 3
  • Small q waves followed by tall R waves characterize the lateral high leads (I and aVL) 2

Important Diagnostic Pitfalls

Before diagnosing LAFB, exclude other causes of left axis deviation:

  • Left ventricular hypertrophy must be ruled out 2
  • Age-related leftward axis shift in elderly patients can mimic LAFB 1, 2
  • Congenital heart defects, particularly atrioventricular canal defects, cause left axis deviation from infancy 1, 2

Critical caveat: Left axis deviation alone should not be considered synonymous with LAFB—the delayed intrinsicoid deflection in aVL is essential for diagnosis 4. Studies show only 41% of ECGs with axis at -30° demonstrate delayed activation in aVL, increasing to 100% at -75° or greater 4.

Etiology

Pathophysiologic Mechanisms

LAFB results from conduction block in the anterior fascicle of the left bundle branch, with multiple potential etiologies: 1

Common causes include:

  • Degenerative/fibrotic disease of the conduction system (most common) 1
  • Ischemic heart disease and myocardial infarction 1, 3
  • Hypertensive heart disease 2, 3
  • Infiltrative diseases 1
  • Inflammatory/infectious processes 1
  • Congenital heart defects (atrioventricular canal defects) 2, 3
  • Genetic/hereditary conduction disorders (Lenegre disease) 2
  • Traumatic injury 1

Clinical Context and Prevalence

  • Prevalence is 0.5-1.0% in the general population under 40 years 2
  • More common in males and increases with age 2
  • May be isolated and benign in patients without structural heart disease 2, 3
  • In acute myocardial infarction, LAFB indicates more severe coronary disease and worse outcomes 3

Impact on Other ECG Interpretations

LAFB significantly affects interpretation of left ventricular hypertrophy:

  • R-wave amplitude in leads I and aVL are unreliable for LVH diagnosis when LAFB is present 1, 3
  • Criteria incorporating S-wave depth in left precordial leads (V5, V6) improve LVH detection in the presence of LAFB 1, 3

LAFB can mask or mimic other conditions:

  • Small Q waves in V2 may simulate anteroseptal infarction 5
  • Inferior and anterior myocardial infarctions may be masked by R waves replacing Q waves 5

Clinical Evaluation and Management

When LAFB is detected, perform:

  • Thorough cardiological evaluation including exercise testing, 24-hour ECG monitoring, and cardiac imaging to identify underlying structural disease 2, 3
  • Echocardiography if structural heart disease is suspected 1
  • ECG screening of siblings in young patients with bifascicular block patterns to exclude genetic progressive conduction disease 2, 3

Prognostic implications:

  • Isolated LAFB without other conduction abnormalities is generally benign 2, 3
  • When associated with other conduction abnormalities, there is increased risk of developing clinically significant AV block requiring monitoring for progression 2, 3
  • In acute MI context, more vigilant monitoring is warranted due to potential progression to higher-grade AV block 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnóstico y Significado Clínico del Hemobloqueo Anterior de Rama Izquierda

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Left Anterior Fascicular Block (LAFB) on ECG

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.