What does it mean if a 6-month-old infant consistently keeps their arms close to their chest?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

6-Month-Old Infant Keeping Arms Close to Chest

A 6-month-old infant consistently keeping their arms close to their chest is an abnormal finding that warrants immediate developmental and neurological evaluation, as this posture suggests increased muscle tone, developmental delay, or underlying neurological impairment that could significantly impact long-term motor development and quality of life.

Clinical Significance of Arm Positioning

At 6 months of age, infants should demonstrate:

  • Active reaching and grasping movements with arms extended away from the body
  • Bilateral arm movements during play and exploration
  • Ability to bring hands to midline and transfer objects between hands

Persistent arm adduction (keeping arms close to chest) is abnormal and may indicate:

  • Increased muscle tone (hypertonia/spasticity) suggesting upper motor neuron involvement 1
  • Developmental delay affecting motor milestone achievement 1
  • Neurological injury such as cerebral palsy or other central nervous system disorders 1

Red Flag Assessment

Immediate Neurological Concerns

Evaluate for associated high-risk features that increase likelihood of developmental disability 1:

  • History of intraparenchymal hemorrhage (carries very high risk of disability) 1
  • Periventricular cysts or encephalomalacia on prior imaging 1
  • Abnormal neurodevelopmental examination findings including:
    • Persistent primitive reflexes beyond expected age
    • Absent or delayed protective reflexes
    • Asymmetric tone or movement patterns
    • Poor head control or truncal hypotonia with limb hypertonia

Multiple Risk Factor Assessment

Infants with multiple risk factors have substantially greater risk of developmental disability than those with single risk factors 1. Assess for:

  • Prematurity (especially <32 weeks gestation) 2
  • Low birth weight 2
  • Perinatal complications including hypoxic-ischemic injury
  • Environmental risk factors 1

Differential Diagnosis Considerations

Neurological Causes (Most Concerning)

  • Cerebral palsy (spastic type most commonly presents with increased tone and adducted arms)
  • Periventricular leukomalacia sequelae
  • Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy consequences

Musculoskeletal Causes

  • Brachial plexus injury (typically unilateral)
  • Congenital contractures

Positional/Behavioral Causes (Less Likely at This Age)

  • Severe positional preference (though this would be unusual to persist to 6 months) 3
  • Lack of tummy time leading to delayed motor development 3

Immediate Management Algorithm

Step 1: Comprehensive Neurodevelopmental Examination

Perform detailed assessment of:

  • Muscle tone in all extremities (assess for hypertonia, hypotonia, or mixed patterns)
  • Deep tendon reflexes (hyperreflexia suggests upper motor neuron involvement)
  • Primitive reflex persistence (Moro, asymmetric tonic neck reflex should be integrating by 6 months)
  • Voluntary movement patterns and ability to reach across midline
  • Head control and truncal stability
  • Hip examination for adductor spasticity or hip dysplasia

Step 2: Developmental Milestone Assessment

Document achievement or delay of age-appropriate milestones 1:

  • Gross motor: Rolling both directions, sitting with support, bearing weight on legs
  • Fine motor: Reaching, grasping, transferring objects hand-to-hand
  • Social: Responding to name, social smile, stranger awareness
  • Language: Babbling, responding to sounds

Step 3: Risk Stratification

High-risk infants (requiring immediate specialist referral) 1:

  • Abnormal neurodevelopmental examination findings
  • History of significant perinatal brain injury
  • Multiple risk factors present
  • Clear developmental delay across domains

Moderate-risk infants (requiring close monitoring and early intervention referral):

  • Single risk factor without clear examination abnormalities
  • Mild tone abnormalities
  • Borderline developmental delays

Referral Strategy

Immediate Referrals (Within 1-2 Weeks)

  • Pediatric neurology for any infant with abnormal tone or concerning examination findings
  • Early intervention services for developmental assessment and therapy initiation 4
  • Physical therapy for motor assessment and treatment planning

Urgent Imaging Consideration

  • Brain MRI if not previously performed and neurological abnormality suspected (provides best assessment of structural brain injury)

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Attributing abnormal posturing to "normal variation" - Persistent arm adduction at 6 months is not normal and requires evaluation
  2. Delaying referral while "waiting to see if they grow out of it" - Early intervention is critical for optimizing outcomes 1, 2
  3. Focusing only on gross motor skills - Assess all developmental domains as delays often co-occur 1
  4. Missing associated feeding difficulties - Infants with neurological impairment often have oral-motor dysfunction requiring feeding evaluation 4

Monitoring and Follow-Up

All high-risk infants require careful pediatric follow-up including developmental screening 1:

  • Weekly to biweekly visits initially if developmental concerns identified 4
  • Serial neurodevelopmental examinations to track progression or improvement
  • Growth monitoring as neurological impairment can affect feeding and growth 4
  • Family education and support regarding developmental expectations and therapy participation 2

The efficient use of limited resources argues for selection of highest-risk infants for comprehensive developmental follow-up programs 1, but this infant's presentation warrants immediate evaluation given the abnormal motor pattern at 6 months of age.

References

Research

The high-risk infant.

Pediatric clinics of North America, 1993

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Initial Management of Feeding Difficulties in Infants

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.