Are codes 95941, 95938, and 95861 medically indicated for a patient with spinal stenosis, lumbar region without neurogenic claudication, undergoing posterior lumbar decompression/fusion procedure?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 10, 2025 • View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Medical Necessity Determination for Intraoperative Neurophysiology Monitoring Codes

Code 95938 (SSEP) is medically necessary and should be approved, while codes 95941 (remote IONM) and 95861 (intraoperative EMG) cannot be approved due to insufficient documentation of critical medical necessity criteria, despite the clinical appropriateness of the underlying fusion procedure. 1

Code 95938 (Short-Latency Somatosensory Evoked Potentials) - APPROVED

  • MCG criteria A-0143 is clearly met for intraoperative monitoring during spinal surgery with documented need for monitoring of neural pathways during the L3-S1 posterior lumbar decompression/fusion procedure 1

  • The IONM technical report documents appropriate SSEP monitoring with ulnar nerve stimulation (upper extremity) and posterior tibial nerve stimulation (lower extremity), with technically satisfactory responses and continuous monitoring throughout the procedure 1

  • The procedure involved multilevel decompression and fusion (L3-S1), which creates significant risk for neural injury warranting SSEP monitoring, particularly given the extensive nature of the surgery 1

Code 95941 (Continuous Remote IONM) - CANNOT APPROVE

Critical Documentation Deficiencies

  • The surgeon's operative note requirement is NOT MET - there is no documentation that the surgeon's operative note reflects the necessity for intraoperative monitoring or documents whether monitoring remained stable and what interventions were performed 1

  • Physical examination documentation is NOT MET - the medical record lacks documentation of physical examination findings, which is explicitly required by Aetna CPB 0697 for all medical necessity determinations 1

  • Baseline testing documentation is UNCLEAR - while the report states "responses were compared to the previously acquired post-induction baselines," there is insufficient documentation that baseline testing with contemporaneous interpretation was performed prior to the surgical procedure with documented results of testing multiple leads for signal strength, clarity, and amplitude 1

Additional Concerns

  • The 8-minute increment requirement appears met, but without complete documentation of the surgeon's operative note and baseline testing, the medical necessity cannot be established 1

  • Remote monitoring requires a trained technician in continuous attendance in the operating room with real-time communication with the supervising physician - while this appears to be met based on the IONM technologist documentation, the other documentation deficiencies prevent approval 1

Code 95861 (Needle Electromyography) - CANNOT APPROVE

MCG Criteria Gap

  • MCG A-0142 does not address intraoperative electromyography - this code specifically covers diagnostic EMG and nerve conduction studies, not intraoperative monitoring during surgery 1

  • The absence of applicable MCG criteria for intraoperative EMG creates uncertainty about medical necessity determination 1

Documentation Deficiencies

  • The same documentation deficiencies that affect code 95941 also apply here - missing surgeon's operative note documentation, absent physical examination, and unclear baseline testing documentation 1

  • The IONM technical report documents EMG monitoring of multiple muscle groups (gastrocnemius S1, tibialis anterior L5, vastus medialis/lateralis L2-L4) with no significant EMG activity observed, but this alone is insufficient without the required supporting documentation 1

Clinical Context: The Underlying Fusion Procedure

Diagnosis M48.06 (Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Region WITHOUT Neurogenic Claudication)

  • This diagnosis creates a significant concern - the American Association of Neurological Surgeons guidelines recommend decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis without evidence of instability, and fusion is only indicated when there is documented instability, spondylolisthesis, or deformity 1, 2

  • The diagnosis code M48.06 specifically states "without neurogenic claudication," yet the patient underwent extensive L3-S1 decompression and fusion, which suggests either: (1) the diagnosis code is incorrect and should reflect instability/spondylolisthesis if present, or (2) the fusion may not have been indicated 1, 2

Evidence-Based Fusion Criteria

  • Fusion should only be added to decompression when specific biomechanical instability is present - such as spondylolisthesis of any grade, radiographic instability on flexion-extension films, or significant deformity 1

  • Multiple studies demonstrate that in the absence of deformity or instability, lumbar fusion has not been shown to improve outcomes in patients with isolated stenosis, and blood loss and operative duration are higher in fusion procedures without proven benefit 1, 3

  • The operative note mentions "post laminectomy, stenosis" which may indicate prior surgery and potential instability, but this is not clearly documented in the diagnosis code or medical record provided 1

Common Pitfalls and Required Actions

For Future Approvals of IONM Codes

  • The surgeon's operative note MUST explicitly document the necessity for intraoperative monitoring, whether monitoring remained stable throughout the procedure, and what interventions (if any) were performed based on monitoring data 1

  • A complete physical examination MUST be documented in the medical record prior to surgery, including neurological examination findings that support the need for monitoring 1

  • Baseline testing MUST be clearly documented with contemporaneous interpretation prior to the surgical procedure, including specific documentation of signal strength, clarity, amplitude, and latencies at various testing points 1

Diagnosis Code Accuracy

  • Verify whether the patient has spondylolisthesis, instability, or deformity - if present, the diagnosis code should reflect this (e.g., M43.16 for spondylolisthesis) rather than M48.06, as this would support both the fusion procedure and the need for comprehensive IONM 1, 2

  • If no instability is present, the extensive L3-S1 fusion may not meet evidence-based criteria, as decompression alone is recommended for isolated stenosis without instability 1, 2, 3

References

1
Guideline

Lumbar Spine Fusion for Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

2
Guideline

Initial Management for Lumbar Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

Is a left L5-S1 MIS microdiscectomy (CPT 63047) medically indicated for a patient with spinal stenosis (DX) in the lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, presenting with left lower extremity radicular symptoms, without documentation of advanced imaging reports or physical examination, and no documentation of failure of 3 months of nonoperative therapy?
What are the treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis?
What is the most likely cause of an elderly patient's recent changes in activity, including back pain, difficulty walking, and a wide-based gait?
What is the best lower back vibrator for managing spinal stenosis symptoms?
What are the management options for cervical stenosis?
What is the treatment plan for a homeless patient with MDD, GAD, ADHD, and PTSD?
What is the primary management approach for patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease?
What are the next steps for a patient with a swollen hand and wrist fracture, presenting with new onset discoloration, who is currently in a sling and cast?
What is the management for hypocalcemia (low calcium levels)?
What is the role of heparin (anticoagulant) in patients with Chronic Liver Disease (CLD)?
What is the recommended vitamin D replacement regimen for individuals with vitamin D deficiency?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Ask Question