Is therapeutic facet joint steroid injection at lumbar levels L4-L5 and L5-S1 on the right, with CPT/HCPCS codes 64493 and 64494, medically indicated for a patient with a diagnosis of Spondylosis without Myelopathy or Radiculopathy (M47.817)?

Medical Necessity Assessment for Therapeutic Facet Joint Steroid Injections

Direct Answer

Therapeutic facet joint steroid injections at L4-L5 and L5-S1 are NOT medically indicated for this patient with spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy (M47.817) based on current evidence. 1, 2, 3

---

Critical Evidence Against Therapeutic Facet Injections

The strongest guideline evidence demonstrates that intraarticular facet joint injections lack therapeutic efficacy:

• The Journal of Neurosurgery (2014) provides moderate evidence (Level II) that intraarticular facet injections have no role in treating chronic low back pain from lumbar degenerative disease, with studies showing they are no more effective than placebo for pain relief and disability improvement. 1

• The North American Spine Society explicitly recommends against using facet joint injections for chronic low-back pain without radiculopathy from degenerative disease, stating long-lasting benefit has not been demonstrated (high-quality evidence). 3

• Multiple studies demonstrate that only 7.7% of patients achieve complete relief after facet injections, and facet joints are not the primary pain source in 90% of patients with back pain. 2

---

Why This Case Does Not Meet Medical Necessity Criteria

The diagnosis code M47.817 (spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy) represents non-specific degenerative changes and does NOT establish facet-mediated pain as the diagnosis. 2

Missing Essential Prerequisites:

1. Lack of Confirmed Facet-Mediated Pain Diagnosis:

• The American College of Neurosurgery requires diagnostic confirmation using the double-injection technique with ≥80% pain relief threshold before any therapeutic intervention. 1, 2, 3
• No physical examination findings or imaging alone can reliably diagnose facet-mediated pain. 2
• Spondylosis on imaging does not equal facet syndrome—facet-mediated pain occurs in only 9-42% of patients with degenerative lumbar disease. 2

2. Insufficient Documentation of Conservative Treatment Failure:

• Medical necessity requires documented failure of at least 6 weeks of conservative management including physical therapy and medications. 2
• Pain must persist for more than 3 months and limit daily activities. 2

3. Wrong Procedure for Therapeutic Intent:

• If facet-mediated pain were confirmed, medial branch blocks provide superior therapeutic efficacy (average 15 weeks relief per injection) compared to intraarticular injections. 2, 4
• The British Pain Society states therapeutic facet joint intraarticular injections should only be performed in the context of clinical governance, audit, or research—not routine clinical practice. 1

---

Correct Diagnostic and Treatment Algorithm

Step 1: Establish Specific Pain Generator

• Perform controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks (double-injection technique) using anesthetics with different durations on separate occasions. 1, 2
• Require ≥80% pain relief to confirm facet-mediated pain. 1, 3
• Consider alternative diagnoses: discogenic pain, sacroiliac joint pathology, or mechanical instability from spondylosis. 2

Step 2: If Facet-Mediated Pain Confirmed

• First-line therapeutic intervention: Medial branch blocks (CPT codes would differ from 64493/64494), NOT intraarticular facet injections. 2, 4
• Each medial branch block provides approximately 15 weeks of pain relief with better evidence than intraarticular injections. 2, 4

Step 3: Definitive Treatment

• Radiofrequency ablation of medial branch nerves is the gold standard for confirmed facet-mediated pain, providing 3-6 months of relief. 1, 2, 4
• This should follow positive response to diagnostic/therapeutic medial branch blocks. 4, 3

---

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not proceed with facet injections based solely on:

• Imaging findings of facet arthropathy or spondylosis—these do not correlate with facet-mediated pain. 2, 3
• Non-specific low back pain without confirmed facet syndrome through proper diagnostic blocks. 1, 2
• Clinical suspicion alone—no physical examination findings reliably predict facet-mediated pain. 2

The CPT codes 64493 and 64494 represent intraarticular facet joint injections, which have been demonstrated ineffective as therapeutic interventions and should be reserved for diagnostic purposes only when using the proper double-block protocol. 1, 2, 3

---

Alternative Appropriate Interventions

If the patient has non-specific spondylosis pain:

• Continue conservative management with physical therapy focusing on core strengthening and extension exercises. 4
• Optimize pharmacologic management with NSAIDs and neuropathic pain medications if appropriate. 4
• Consider comprehensive biopsychosocial assessment before any interventional procedures. 1

If radicular symptoms develop:

• Epidural steroid injections would be more appropriate than facet injections for addressing radicular pain from disc pathology. 2

Mandatory procedural requirement if any facet intervention is performed:

• Fluoroscopic or CT guidance is required for all facet joint interventions (Level I evidence). 2, 4