What is the most appropriate initial intervention for a patient with partial-thickness burns to both arms, the anterior chest, and the abdomen?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Fluid Resuscitation Targeting Urine Output 0.5-1 mL/kg/hr

This patient requires fluid resuscitation targeting a urine output greater than 0.5 mL/kg/hr (Option A). 1

Burn Assessment and Fluid Resuscitation Requirements

This patient has partial-thickness burns (extending through epidermis to dermis) involving:

  • Both arms (approximately 18% TBSA)
  • Anterior chest (approximately 9% TBSA)
  • Abdomen (approximately 9% TBSA)
  • Total estimated TBSA: ~36%

Any adult with burns ≥10% TBSA requires formal fluid resuscitation. 2 This patient clearly exceeds this threshold and needs aggressive fluid management.

Initial Fluid Resuscitation Protocol

Immediate first hour: Administer 20 mL/kg of balanced crystalloid solution (preferably Ringer's Lactate) within the first hour. 1, 2

24-hour fluid calculation: Use the Parkland formula (2-4 mL/kg/%TBSA burned). 2 For this patient with approximately 36% TBSA:

  • Give half of the calculated 24-hour requirement in the first 8 hours post-burn
  • Give the remaining half over the next 16 hours 2

Monitoring and Titration Strategy

The easiest and fastest way to adjust fluid resuscitation rates is based on hourly urine output, with a target of 0.5-1 mL/kg/h commonly used in adults with thermal burns. 1 This is the standard monitoring parameter that guides ongoing fluid administration. 2

Additional monitoring parameters may include:

  • Arterial lactate concentration
  • Advanced hemodynamic monitoring (echocardiography, cardiac output monitoring) particularly valuable in patients with hemodynamic instability or persistent oliguria despite resuscitation 1

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

Option B (30 mL/kg bolus): This represents a generic sepsis resuscitation protocol, not the specific burn resuscitation strategy. Burns require calculated, sustained fluid administration based on TBSA and weight, not a single bolus approach.

Option C (STAT echocardiogram): Echocardiography is reserved for patients with persistent hypotension despite appropriate fluid resuscitation or hemodynamic instability. 1 It is not a first-line requirement for stable burn patients.

Option D (Intubation): There is no indication for immediate intubation based on the information provided. Intubation would be indicated for:

  • Inhalation injury (circumoral burns, oropharyngeal burns, carbonaceous sputum) 2
  • Respiratory compromise
  • Circumferential thoracic burns causing ventilatory compromise 1

None of these are mentioned in this case.

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Avoid "fluid creep" (excessive fluid administration beyond calculated requirements), as both under-resuscitation and over-resuscitation are associated with increased morbidity. 1, 2 The urine output target of 0.5-1 mL/kg/hr provides the objective measure to prevent both extremes.

Use balanced crystalloid solutions (Ringer's Lactate), not 0.9% NaCl, as normal saline is associated with higher risk of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and acute kidney injury. 1, 2

Monitor for compartment syndrome given the circumferential nature of arm burns, which may require escharotomy if circulatory compromise develops. 2, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Severe Burns

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Initial Management of Forearm Burns

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.