Which contraceptive method, Intrauterine Device (IUD) or Oral Contraceptive Pill (OCP), reduces the risk of ectopic pregnancy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Which Contraceptive Reduces Ectopic Pregnancy Risk: IUD vs OCP?

Both IUDs and OCPs dramatically reduce the absolute risk of ectopic pregnancy compared to using no contraception, but OCPs provide superior protection against ectopic pregnancy specifically when comparing the two methods head-to-head. 1, 2

Understanding the Paradox of IUDs and Ectopic Pregnancy

The relationship between IUDs and ectopic pregnancy is frequently misunderstood and requires careful explanation:

Absolute Risk (What Matters Most for Patient Safety)

  • IUDs are highly effective contraceptives with extremely low absolute rates of ectopic pregnancy due to their high efficacy in preventing all pregnancies 3
  • The absolute risk of ectopic pregnancy among IUD users is extremely low because the device prevents nearly all pregnancies from occurring 3
  • When comparing IUD users to women using no contraception, IUD users have a dramatically lower risk of ectopic pregnancy (relative risk = 0.2) 2

Relative Risk (The Clinical Caveat)

  • However, when a pregnancy does occur with an IUD in place, it is disproportionately more likely to be ectopic rather than intrauterine 3, 1
  • When comparing IUD users to oral contraceptive users, IUD users have a 3.8-fold increased risk of ectopic pregnancy (95% CI: 1.5-9.9) 2
  • When comparing IUD users to barrier method users, IUD users have a 3.6-fold increased risk of ectopic pregnancy (95% CI: 1.6-8.1) 2
  • This occurs because IUDs are more effective at preventing intrauterine pregnancy than ectopic pregnancy 3, 1

Direct Comparison: IUD vs OCP

OCPs provide better protection against ectopic pregnancy than IUDs when comparing contraceptive failure rates:

  • Women using IUDs have nearly 4 times the risk of ectopic pregnancy compared to women using oral contraceptives when contraceptive failure occurs 2
  • Meta-analysis data confirms that current IUD use, when compared to pregnant controls, shows an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy (pooled OR: 10.63,95% CI: 7.66-14.74) 1
  • Past IUD use may mildly elevate the risk of ectopic pregnancy even after removal (pooled OR: 1.40,95% CI: 1.23-1.59) 1

Clinical Algorithm for Contraceptive Selection

For women with a history of ectopic pregnancy:

  • Both IUDs and OCPs receive a Category 1 classification (no restrictions) from the CDC Medical Eligibility Criteria 3
  • However, OCPs should be preferentially recommended when ectopic pregnancy prevention is a specific concern, given the lower relative risk when contraceptive failure occurs 2

For women prioritizing overall pregnancy prevention:

  • IUDs remain an excellent choice with pregnancy rates of only 1.0-1.8% over 3-9 years of use 4
  • The absolute ectopic pregnancy rate with IUD use is very low 4

Critical Clinical Pitfall

The most important pitfall is misinterpreting the data: Clinicians must distinguish between the absolute risk (IUDs dramatically reduce ectopic pregnancy risk compared to no contraception) and the relative risk (when pregnancy occurs with an IUD, it's more likely to be ectopic) 3, 1, 2. This distinction is crucial for proper counseling.

When an IUD user presents with a positive pregnancy test:

  • Immediately evaluate for ectopic pregnancy with ultrasound and serial β-hCG 3
  • The likelihood of ectopic pregnancy is greatly increased compared to pregnancies without an IUD 3, 5
  • Ruptured ectopic pregnancy can occur even with a correctly positioned IUD 5

Bottom Line for Practice

If the specific goal is to minimize ectopic pregnancy risk, OCPs are the superior choice over IUDs 2. While both methods dramatically reduce the absolute risk of ectopic pregnancy compared to no contraception, OCPs provide approximately 4-fold better protection when comparing the two methods directly in the event of contraceptive failure 2.

References

Research

Current use of an intrauterine device and risk of tubal pregnancy.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 1993

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Intrauterine contraception.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 1992

Research

Ruptured Ectopic Pregnancy in the Presence of an Intrauterine Device.

Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.