What are the differences between Aristada (aripiprazole lauroxil) and Abilify Maintena (aripiprazole monohydrate) in the treatment of schizophrenia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Key Differences Between Aristada and Abilify Maintena

Both Aristada (aripiprazole lauroxil) and Abilify Maintena (aripiprazole monohydrate) are long-acting injectable formulations of aripiprazole approved for schizophrenia treatment, but Aristada offers superior dosing flexibility with monthly, 6-week, and 8-week interval options, while Abilify Maintena requires strictly monthly administration. 1, 2

Formulation and Chemical Structure

  • Aristada is a prodrug formulation (aripiprazole lauroxil) that requires conversion to active aripiprazole in the body, whereas Abilify Maintena contains the active drug directly (aripiprazole monohydrate). 1

  • Aristada is administered as an extended-release injectable suspension, while Abilify Maintena is a lyophilized powder requiring reconstitution with sterile water before injection. 1, 3

Dosing Flexibility: The Critical Advantage

  • Aristada provides three distinct dosing interval options: 441 mg or 882 mg every 4 weeks (monthly), 882 mg every 6 weeks, or 1064 mg every 8 weeks. 1

  • Abilify Maintena is limited to monthly (every 4 weeks) administration only, which may be less convenient for some patients and healthcare systems. 3, 2

  • This dosing flexibility with Aristada represents a potential advantage for tailoring therapy to individual patient needs and preferences, particularly for those who prefer less frequent injections. 1

Oral Coverage Requirements

  • Both formulations require a period of concurrent oral aripiprazole coverage after the first injection while therapeutic levels are established. 3

  • Aristada requires oral supplementation, though the specific duration varies by dosing regimen selected. 1

  • Abilify Maintena similarly requires oral coverage during the initial period, though this requirement is present for both formulations. 3

Storage and Administration Practicalities

  • Abilify Maintena requires no refrigeration and uses simple reconstitution with sterile water, making storage and administration logistically easier. 3

  • Both formulations are administered via intramuscular injection. 1, 2

Efficacy Evidence Base

  • Aristada's efficacy at 441 mg and 882 mg monthly doses has been directly demonstrated in phase III trials for acute exacerbations and long-term maintenance, while the 6-week and 8-week dosing regimens were established through pharmacokinetic bridging studies. 1

  • Abilify Maintena's efficacy has been demonstrated in randomized trials showing noninferiority to oral aripiprazole in delaying relapse and reducing relapse rates in schizophrenia. 2

  • Both formulations maintain the established efficacy profile of aripiprazole, which effectively reduces positive symptoms in schizophrenia. 4, 2

Tolerability and Safety Profile

  • Both formulations share the favorable metabolic profile of oral aripiprazole, including weight neutrality and minimal metabolic side effects—a significant advantage over other second-generation antipsychotic LAIs like risperidone or paliperidone. 1, 3, 2

  • The adverse event profiles are consistent with oral aripiprazole, with the addition of injection-site reactions for both LAI formulations. 1, 2

  • Both carry the expected risk of extrapyramidal symptoms, particularly akathisia, which is well-documented with aripiprazole across all formulations. 3, 5

  • Neither formulation is associated with clinically significant weight gain, hyperprolactinemia, or QT interval prolongation. 5

Clinical Positioning

  • Both LAI formulations are particularly valuable for the 70% of schizophrenia patients requiring long-term medication who have recurrent relapses related to nonadherence with oral preparations. 6, 7, 1

  • The American Psychiatric Association recommends antipsychotic monotherapy as first-line treatment, with LAI formulations being optimal for patients with adherence concerns. 6, 8

  • Both formulations provide effective maintenance treatment following stabilization on oral antipsychotics. 8, 2

Drug Interaction Considerations

  • Both formulations require careful review of concomitant medications for CYP3A4 inducers and CYP2D6 inhibitors, as these significantly affect aripiprazole concentrations and may necessitate dosage adjustments. 3, 5

  • CYP3A4 inducers decrease aripiprazole levels, while CYP2D6 inhibitors increase levels, requiring dosage modifications for both formulations. 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume equivalent dosing between the two formulations—they have different dosing schedules and milligram strengths that are not directly interchangeable. 1, 2

  • Ensure adequate oral coverage is provided during the initial treatment period for both formulations to prevent symptom breakthrough. 3

  • Monitor for akathisia specifically, as this is the most common extrapyramidal side effect with aripiprazole formulations and may lead to treatment discontinuation if not addressed. 3, 5

  • Screen for metabolic enzyme inducers/inhibitors before initiating either formulation to determine if dosage adjustment is needed. 3, 5

References

Research

Long-acting injectable aripiprazole: how might it fit in our tool box?

Clinical schizophrenia & related psychoses, 2013

Guideline

Paliperidone Palmitate Treatment for Disorganized Schizophrenia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Primary Treatment Approach for Schizophrenia and Dopamine Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Schizophrenia Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.