Post-TAVR Follow-Up for Macrocytic Anemia and Elevated BUN/Creatinine
This elderly male patient requires structured follow-up per ACC guidelines with specific attention to monitoring renal function and investigating the macrocytic anemia, which may improve post-TAVR but warrants evaluation for B12/folate deficiency given the MCV of 103.6.
Required Follow-Up Schedule
Structured post-TAVR surveillance is mandatory regardless of baseline laboratory abnormalities:
- TAVR team evaluation at 30 days to assess for procedural complications and establish baseline post-procedure status 1
- Primary cardiologist at 6 months, then annually for ongoing cardiac management 1
- Primary care physician or geriatrician at 3 months, then as needed for management of comorbidities including renal disease and anemia 1
Laboratory Monitoring Requirements
The ACC recommends specific laboratory surveillance post-TAVR:
- Monitor blood counts, metabolic panel, and renal function as part of routine post-TAVR care 1
- Repeat CBC and comprehensive metabolic panel at the 30-day TAVR team visit to track trends in MCV, hemoglobin, BUN, and creatinine 1
- Serial renal function monitoring is particularly important as 80% of patients show stable or improved kidney function after TAVR, but 26% may experience ≥10% deterioration in eGFR at 1 month 2
Explanation of Laboratory Values
Macrocytic Anemia (MCV 103.6, MCH 33.5)
The elevated MCV warrants investigation despite being baseline:
- Macrocytosis may improve post-TAVR as anemia rates decrease significantly (from 67.5% to 53.9%) at 5-12 months following the procedure, likely due to resolution of gastrointestinal blood loss from AS-associated angiodysplasia 3
- Evaluate for B12 and folate deficiency as these are common in elderly patients and require specific treatment 4
- B12 deficiency allowed to progress >3 months produces permanent spinal cord damage, making early diagnosis critical 4
- If B12 deficiency is confirmed, lifelong monthly intramuscular B12 100 mcg injections are required, as oral forms are unreliable in elderly patients with absorption issues 4
Elevated BUN (34) with BUN/Creatinine Ratio of 31
The elevated BUN/Cr ratio suggests a prerenal component but requires ongoing monitoring:
- Baseline renal dysfunction is common in TAVR patients (mean eGFR 65.1 mL/min in large cohorts), and this appears to be this patient's baseline 2
- Renal function may improve post-TAVR in patients with cardiorenal syndrome; 36.8% show ≥10% improvement in eGFR at 1 month, and those with CKD resolution have mortality rates similar to patients with normal baseline renal function 2, 5
- However, 26% experience ≥10% deterioration in eGFR, which is associated with a 2.16-fold increased hazard ratio for 2-year mortality 2
- Worsening renal function at 3-6 months occurs in only 15% of patients with baseline CKD but carries significant mortality risk (HR 2.2) 6
Critical Monitoring Points
Key factors to assess at follow-up visits:
- Volume status and heart failure symptoms, as improved cardiac output post-TAVR may improve prerenal azotemia 1, 2
- Medication review to ensure nephrotoxic agents are minimized and appropriate antithrombotic therapy (aspirin 75-100 mg daily lifelong, clopidogrel 75 mg daily for 3-6 months) is maintained 1, 7, 8
- Signs of B12 deficiency progression including neurologic symptoms (paresthesias, ataxia, cognitive changes) that can become irreversible if untreated 4
- Echocardiography at 30 days and annually to assess valve function and cardiac output, which directly impacts renal perfusion 1, 7
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Critical errors in post-TAVR management:
- Do not assume stable baseline values require no investigation—macrocytosis warrants B12/folate evaluation regardless of chronicity 4
- Do not attribute all renal dysfunction to chronic disease—15-40% of patients show improvement post-TAVR, suggesting reversible cardiorenal syndrome 2, 5
- Do not delay B12 supplementation if deficiency is confirmed—neurologic damage becomes irreversible after 3 months 4
- Do not miss the 30-day TAVR team evaluation—this is when procedural complications and baseline changes are best identified 1, 7