Is it appropriate to pack a non-healing abdominal wound with Betadine (povidone-iodine) gauze and cover with a foam dressing?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Betadine Gauze Packing is NOT Appropriate for Non-Healing Abdominal Wounds

For non-healing abdominal wounds, you should use negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with specialized foam-based dressing systems rather than Betadine gauze packing, as foam-based NPWT is an independent predictor of successful wound closure while gauze packing has no published evidence supporting its use in abdominal wound management. 1

Why Gauze Packing Fails in Abdominal Wounds

The International Journal of Surgery explicitly states there are no publications regarding the use of gauze as a wound filler for temporary abdominal closure or complex abdominal wounds. 1 This absence of evidence is particularly damning given that:

  • Gauze does not compress under negative pressure, eliminating the critical "splinting effect" that prevents lateral retraction of the abdominal wall and loss of domain 1
  • Surgical towels and other non-foam materials used in improvised "vac-pac" techniques are not independent predictors of early fascial closure, unlike foam-based NPWT 1, 2
  • Prospective comparative studies demonstrate significantly increased fascial closure rates with commercial foam products versus improvised alternatives 2

The Betadine Problem

While povidone-iodine has some role in wound care, its use in packing non-healing abdominal wounds is problematic:

  • Betadine solution and ointment do not interfere with healing in superficial wounds when used appropriately 3, 4
  • However, Betadine is primarily studied for superficial infected ulcers and chronic venous wounds, not complex abdominal wounds 4, 5
  • Recent evidence (2024) suggests limited effectiveness of povidone-iodine for wound care outcomes, with the scoping review concluding PV-I is not highly recommended for wound care 6
  • Betadine-soaked gauze provides no mechanical advantage for wound closure, fluid management, or prevention of adhesions—all critical in abdominal wounds 1

What You Should Do Instead

Use specialized foam-based NPWT systems (Grade B recommendation) with the following approach: 1, 2

For Open or Dehisced Abdominal Wounds:

  • Apply a non-adherent interface layer to protect exposed organs and prevent bowel adhesions (this is mandatory—GPP recommendation) 1
  • Use polyurethane foam that compresses under negative pressure to provide medial traction and splinting 1, 2
  • Set continuous NPWT at 50-80 mmHg (lower pressures for vulnerable patients) 2
  • The system should evacuate approximately 800ml of fluid to prevent pooling 2

For Closed Incisions at Risk:

  • Apply incisional NPWT on the closed wound (Grade B recommendation) 1
  • This significantly reduces wound complications including dehiscence and infection compared to standard gauze dressings 1

Critical Timing Considerations:

  • You have a 7-10 day window for primary fascial closure before fixity develops 1
  • NPWT can extend this window, with successful closures reported as late as 21-49 days 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Never apply foam directly to dry wound beds—use a non-adherent silicone contact layer moistened with normal saline between the wound bed and foam 2

Failure to use a non-adherent interface layer exposes the patient to significant risk of fistula formation from bowel damage during dressing changes 1

Preserve skin integrity by placing wound filler within the wound rather than on top of surrounding skin 1

When Betadine Might Have Limited Role

If NPWT is absolutely unavailable and you must use conventional dressings temporarily:

  • Betadine solution (not gauze packing) may provide local antiseptic effect for superficial wound infection 4, 5
  • However, this is a suboptimal temporizing measure only
  • Compression or appropriate wound closure strategies remain essential 5
  • Antimicrobial gauze with polyhexamethylene biguanide shows better bacterial reduction than plain gauze in wounds requiring packing 7

The foam dressing you mentioned should be part of an NPWT system, not used as a passive cover over Betadine-soaked gauze. This combination provides none of the mechanical benefits of true NPWT and lacks evidence for efficacy in abdominal wounds. 1, 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.