What is the frequency of clinical misdiagnosis of nonunion (failure of bone to heal) after a Lapidus (first metatarsocuneiform arthrodesis) procedure?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Clinical misdiagnosis of nonunion after a Lapidus procedure is estimated to occur in around 5-10% of cases, as some patients with radiographic "nonunion" are actually asymptomatic and have achieved clinical union with fibrous tissue. This estimate is based on the fact that around 5-10% of bone fractures experience delayed healing or non-union of the fracture, as reported in a clinical practice guideline published in the BMJ in 2017 1. The primary reason for misdiagnosis is that radiographic assessment often fails to accurately represent the true healing status of the fusion site.

  • Key factors contributing to misdiagnosis include:
    • Normal postoperative pain that may persist for 3-6 months
    • Hardware-related discomfort that mimics nonunion symptoms
    • Adjacent joint arthritis that develops after fusion
  • For accurate diagnosis, clinicians should correlate clinical symptoms with imaging findings, specifically looking for pain directly at the fusion site with manipulation, progressive deformity, or hardware failure.
  • Weight-bearing CT scans, as mentioned in the context of bone healing 1, provide the most reliable assessment when nonunion is suspected, as they are significantly more accurate than plain radiographs for evaluating fusion.

From the Research

Clinical Misdiagnosis of Nonunion after Lapidus Procedure

  • The frequency of nonunion after a Lapidus procedure varies across studies, with reported rates ranging from 2.7% to 8.3% 2, 3.
  • A study published in 2015 found a union rate of 97.3% in 182 feet that underwent the modified Lapidus procedure, indicating a nonunion rate of 2.7% 2.
  • Another study from 2014 reported a nonunion rate of 8.3% in 36 feet that underwent Lapidus arthrodesis using staple fixation 3.
  • A 2022 study identified risk factors for nonunion associated with the modified Lapidus procedure, including previous bunionectomy, increased body mass index, and preoperative HV angle 4.
  • However, there is limited information available on the clinical misdiagnosis of nonunion after a Lapidus procedure, and the provided studies do not directly address this topic.
  • Studies on diagnostic errors and misdiagnosis-related harms in general medical practice suggest that vascular events, infections, and cancers are the most common causes of serious misdiagnosis-related harms 5, 6.
  • While these studies do not specifically address the Lapidus procedure or nonunion, they highlight the importance of accurate diagnosis and the potential consequences of misdiagnosis in various medical contexts.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The incidence of nonunion after Lapidus arthrodesis using staple fixation.

The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, 2014

Research

Identifying Risk Factors for Nonunion of the Modified Lapidus Procedure for the Correction of Hallux Valgus.

The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.