Do you remove stainless steel implants after Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Hardware Removal After ORIF: A Risk-Stratified Approach

Routine removal of stainless steel implants after ORIF is not recommended unless specific indications exist, including infection, symptomatic hardware, implant failure, or interference with growth in children. 1

Clear Indications for Removal

Absolute Indications

  • Infected hardware must be removed regardless of fracture union status, as infection cannot be adequately treated with antibiotics alone when biofilm forms on metallic implants 2, 3
  • Symptomatic implant failure including rod, hook, or screw migration, dislodgment, or breakage requires removal 4
  • Non-union after surgery with hardware in place warrants removal and revision 1
  • Obvious mechanical problems such as prominent hardware causing soft tissue irritation are straightforward indications 1, 5

Relative Indications

  • Pain and discomfort are the most common reasons patients request removal (representing the majority of elective removals), though outcomes can be disappointing when pain is the sole indication 5
  • Implant prominence causing mechanical symptoms, particularly common with distal tibial/ankle plates (14.45% of removals), olecranon hardware (12.04%), and patellar tension band wiring (9.53%) 5
  • Pediatric patients should be considered separately, as metallic implants can interfere with normal growth patterns 1

When NOT to Remove Hardware

Do not remove hardware routinely for concerns about toxicity, allergy, carcinogenesis, or theoretical implant failure - these are not evidence-based indications 1

Material-Specific Considerations

  • Stainless steel versus titanium: While some data suggest titanium may have slightly lower infection rates in contaminated cases, the difference is not statistically significant in most clinical scenarios 6
  • Material type alone should not drive removal decisions in asymptomatic patients 6

High-Risk Populations Requiring Vigilance

Certain patient factors significantly increase infection risk and may lower the threshold for removal if any concerning symptoms develop:

  • Diabetes mellitus with chronic complications (OR=1.69) 2
  • Obesity (OR=1.85) 2
  • Deficiency anemia (OR=1.59) 2
  • Liver disease (OR=2.04) 3
  • Rheumatoid arthritis (OR=2.06) 3
  • Male gender (OR=1.67) 2

Anatomic Site-Specific Risk

Infection-related removal rates vary significantly by location:

  • Highest risk sites: Phalanges/hand (5.61%), phalanges/foot (5.08%), tarsal/metatarsal fractures (OR=1.45), and tibial fractures (OR=1.82) 2, 3
  • These high-risk anatomic locations warrant closer surveillance and lower threshold for removal if infection is suspected 2

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not promise pain relief from removal - when pain is the sole indication without mechanical symptoms or infection, results are often disappointing and patient expectations should be moderated 1
  • Do not underestimate removal complexity - bone ingrowth, implant wear, and tissue scarring can make removal technically challenging and not a "routine" procedure 5
  • Do not delay removal of infected hardware - the economic burden is substantial (mean charge $166,041 for infection-related removal vs $133,110 for elective removal) 2

Post-Removal Management for Infection

When hardware is removed for infection:

  • Antimicrobial therapy duration: 10-14 days for isolated pocket infection, at least 14 days for bloodstream infection, and 4-6 weeks for complicated infections (endocarditis, osteomyelitis, persistent bacteremia) 7
  • Blood cultures must be negative for at least 72 hours before considering reimplantation if needed 7

Practical Algorithm

  1. Assess for absolute indications (infection, failure, non-union, mechanical problems) → Remove if present
  2. Evaluate patient risk factors (diabetes, obesity, immunosuppression) → Lower threshold for removal if symptomatic
  3. Consider anatomic location (hand, foot, tibia = higher risk) → Closer surveillance warranted
  4. If pain alone: Thoroughly investigate mechanical causes and set realistic expectations before proceeding
  5. If asymptomatic and united: Leave hardware in place regardless of material type

References

Research

[Is hardware removal a necessity?].

Revue medicale suisse, 2009

Guideline

Hardware Explantation for Symptomatic Spinal Hardware Failure

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Indications of implant removal: A study of 83 cases.

International journal of health sciences, 2017

Guideline

Criteria for ICD Removal

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.