What are the recommended laser energy settings in Joules for treating grade 1-4 hemorrhoids using 980 nm vs 1740 nm lasers?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Laser Energy Settings for Hemorrhoid Treatment by Grade

For grade 2-3 hemorrhoids, use 980 nm diode laser with total energy of 850 Joules (range 450-1242 J), while grade 4 hemorrhoids should NOT be treated with laser therapy due to significantly higher bleeding and complication rates.

Recommended Energy Settings by Wavelength

980 nm Diode Laser (Standard Approach)

  • Total energy delivered: 850 Joules median (range 450-1242 J) across all hemorrhoidal columns 1
  • Power setting: 5 Watts with frequency of 5 Hz 2
  • Energy density: 19 J/cm² per application 2
  • Individual pile treatment: 4-10 Joules per hemorrhoidal pile 2
  • The 980 nm wavelength is the most commonly used, representing 90.34% of laser hemorrhoid procedures in the literature 3

1740 nm Laser

No clinical data exists in the provided evidence for 1740 nm wavelength laser treatment of hemorrhoids. The literature exclusively describes 980 nm and 810 nm diode lasers 3, 2.

Treatment Algorithm by Hemorrhoid Grade

Grade 1 Hemorrhoids

  • Laser therapy is NOT recommended as first-line treatment 4
  • Conservative management with fiber, fluids, and lifestyle modifications should be attempted first 4
  • If office procedures are needed, infrared photocoagulation or sclerotherapy are preferred over laser 5

Grade 2 Hemorrhoids

  • 980 nm diode laser is appropriate with 850 J total energy 1
  • Success rate: 82.7% complete symptom remission 1
  • Complication rate: 6.7% (primarily minor bleeding) 1
  • Median operative time: 18 minutes 1
  • Alternative: Rubber band ligation remains first-line office procedure with 70-89% success 4

Grade 3 Hemorrhoids

  • 980 nm diode laser with 850 J total energy is effective 1
  • Complication rate: 6.5% 1
  • Laser shows superior outcomes compared to rubber band ligation: 90% symptom resolution vs 53% with ligation at 6 months 6
  • Significantly lower postoperative pain (VAS 1.1 vs 2.9) compared to rubber band ligation 6

Grade 4 Hemorrhoids

  • Laser therapy is NOT recommended due to unacceptably high complication rates 1
  • Post-operative bleeding rate: 31.6% (vs 6.5% for grade 3) 1
  • Readmission rate: 26.3% (vs 5.4% for grade 3) 1
  • Reoperation rate: 21.1% (vs 2.2% for grade 3) 1
  • Multivariate analysis shows 6.98-fold increased risk of bleeding, 5.82-fold increased readmission risk, and 11.4-fold increased recurrence risk 1
  • Conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy is the gold standard with only 2-10% recurrence 4

Technical Considerations

Doppler-Guided Technique

  • Doppler guidance was used in 29.89% of procedures to localize hemorrhoidal arteries 3
  • Five pulsed laser shots delivered to each identified artery approximately 3 cm above dentate line 6
  • Absence of Doppler signal after treatment confirms arterial coagulation 6

Pain Outcomes

  • Mean postoperative pain (VAS): 0.84 ± 1.13 with laser vs 1.78 ± 0.68 with open hemorrhoidectomy (p = 0.018) 2
  • Significantly lower pain compared to open techniques across all studies 3
  • Minimal need for analgesia during hospital stay and at home 7

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never use laser therapy for grade 4 hemorrhoids - the bleeding and reoperation rates are prohibitively high 1
  • Avoid excessive energy delivery - burn lesions occurred in 26.7% when technique was not optimized 2
  • Do not treat large hemorrhoidal piles with laser - technique is not suitable for bulky disease 2
  • Ensure proper fiber placement - residual skin tags (plicoma) occurred in 33% with suboptimal technique 2
  • Screen for immunocompromised status - these patients have increased infection risk with any hemorrhoid procedure 4

Long-Term Outcomes

  • Seven studies with long-term follow-up showed satisfactory symptom relief and low recurrence rates 3
  • At 1-year follow-up: zero stricture rate and minimal recurrence with proper patient selection 7
  • Quality of life significantly higher with laser compared to rubber band ligation (p = 0.002) 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.