HLA-DR Measurement for Diagnosing Immune Paralysis
Monocyte HLA-DR (mHLA-DR) expression measured by flow cytometry serves as the primary diagnostic tool for immune paralysis in critically ill patients, with values ≤5,000 molecules/cell indicating clinically significant immunosuppression and ≤2,000 molecules/cell marking severe immune dysfunction. 1, 2
Pathophysiology and Rationale
After the initial inflammatory response in sepsis or critical illness, professional antigen-presenting cells (dendritic cells and macrophages) reduce expression of the MHC class II molecule HLA-DR, which is a hallmark of the immunocompromised state that develops 3. This decreased HLA-DR expression reflects a broader pattern of immune dysfunction characterized by:
- Expansion of immunosuppressive cell populations (immature PMNs, MDSCs, M2 macrophages) 3
- Production of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, TGF-β) 3
- T cell exhaustion and anergy 3
- Increased susceptibility to secondary infections 3
HLA-DR controls the interplay between innate and adaptive immunity and serves as a "global" biomarker of injury-associated immunosuppression 1. Importantly, routine inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, or leukocyte counts cannot adequately assess functional immunity 1.
Measurement Methods
Flow Cytometry (Standard Approach)
- Quantitative measurement of HLA-DR molecules per monocyte cell using standardized flow cytometry 1
- Expressed as molecules/cell or as percentage of positive cells
- Requires specialized laboratory equipment and trained personnel 2
Point-of-Care Testing (Emerging)
- Novel point-of-care flow cytometers with single-use cartridges now enable bedside measurement 2
- Provides rapid results for clinical decision-making
- Overcomes technical boundaries of traditional flow cytometry 2
Alternative: Gene Expression
- Quantitative PCR measurement of HLA-DRA mRNA expression correlates with protein levels and TNFα response 4
- HLA-DRA expression decreased by ~70% in septic patients compared to controls 4
- Positive correlation between HLA-DRA and TNFα response (r +0.67) 4
Diagnostic Thresholds and Clinical Interpretation
Three clinically relevant thresholds stratify immunosuppression severity 2:
Threshold 1: ≤8,000 molecules/cell
- Indicates mild immunosuppression
- Found in 85.5% of ICU patients on admission 2
- Less specific for predicting complicated courses
Threshold 2: ≤5,000 molecules/cell
- Indicates moderate immunosuppression with clinical significance 2
- Present in 68.2% of ICU admissions 2
- Discriminates patients with:
Threshold 3: ≤2,000 molecules/cell
Clinical Application Algorithm
Step 1: Measure mHLA-DR on ICU admission
- Use flow cytometry (standard or point-of-care) 2
- Single measurement is sufficient for initial risk stratification 2
Step 2: Stratify risk based on threshold
5,000 molecules/cell: Low risk, standard monitoring
- 2,000-5,000 molecules/cell: Moderate risk, enhanced surveillance for infections 2
- <2,000 molecules/cell: High risk, consider for immunomodulatory interventions 1, 2
Step 3: Correlate with functional assays (if available)
- Ex vivo LPS-stimulated TNFα release provides functional confirmation 4
- TNFα:HLA-DRA ratio correlates negatively with SOFA score 4
Step 4: Monitor for clinical consequences
- Secondary/nosocomial infections 3
- Viral reactivation 3
- Prolonged ICU course 2
- Development of persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome (PICS) 3
Important Caveats
HLA-DR measurement does not predict mortality 2. While decreased HLA-DR is associated with adverse outcomes including secondary infection risk, neither the 2,000 nor 5,000 molecules/cell threshold stratified patients by mortality in validation studies 2.
Immunosuppression is independent of admission diagnosis 2. Large proportions of ICU patients present with decreased HLA-DR regardless of whether they have sepsis, trauma, or post-surgical inflammation 2.
The threshold for defining "immunoparalysis" remains debated 3. While <5,000 molecules/cell is commonly used, some experts advocate for lower thresholds, and the optimal cutoff may vary by clinical context 1, 2.
Injury-associated immunosuppression is potentially reversible, opening therapeutic avenues for affected patients 1. This makes accurate diagnosis particularly important for identifying candidates for immunomodulatory interventions.