Can tranexamic acid (TXA) stop a gastrointestinal (GI) bleed?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Tranexamic Acid Should Not Be Used for Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Tranexamic acid (TXA) does not stop GI bleeding and should not be used outside of clinical trials. The highest quality evidence from the HALT-IT trial—the largest randomized controlled trial on this topic—definitively shows that high-dose IV TXA provides no mortality or bleeding benefit while increasing thromboembolic complications 1.

Evidence Against TXA Use

Mortality and Bleeding Outcomes

  • High-dose IV TXA (1g loading dose followed by 3g over 24 hours) does not reduce death from bleeding (RR 0.98,95% CI 0.88-1.09) or rebleeding rates (RR 0.92,95% CI 0.82-1.04) in patients with acute GI bleeding 2, 3, 1.
  • The HALT-IT trial, which enrolled 12,009 patients across 164 hospitals in 15 countries, found that 4% of patients died from bleeding in both the TXA and placebo groups, demonstrating no benefit 1.

Increased Thromboembolic Risk

  • TXA significantly increases venous thromboembolic events, including deep venous thrombosis (RR 2.01,95% CI 1.08-3.72) and pulmonary embolism (RR 1.78,95% CI 1.06-3.0) 2, 3.
  • The HALT-IT trial found venous thromboembolic events occurred in 0.8% of TXA patients versus 0.4% of placebo patients (RR 1.85,95% CI 1.15-2.98) 1.
  • Seizure risk is also increased (RR 1.73,95% CI 1.03-2.93) 3.

Guideline Recommendations

Current Clinical Practice Standards

  • The British Society of Gastroenterology explicitly recommends that TXA use in acute lower GI bleeding should be confined to clinical trials pending results of larger studies 4, 2.
  • The European Association for the Study of the Liver strongly recommends against using TXA in patients with cirrhosis and active variceal bleeding 2.
  • Historical meta-analyses suggesting benefit were based on small, low-quality trials conducted before modern endoscopic therapy and high-dose proton pump inhibitors became standard, making them irrelevant to current practice 4.

What Actually Works for GI Bleeding

Evidence-Based Management

  • Standard resuscitation, endoscopic therapy, and pharmacological treatments should be prioritized over TXA 2.
  • For upper GI bleeding from peptic ulcers after successful endoscopic therapy, high-dose omeprazole (80 mg stat followed by 8 mg/hour infusion for 72 hours) is recommended 4.
  • Early endoscopic intervention for diagnosis and treatment is the cornerstone of management 2.

Anticoagulation Management

  • For patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with life-threatening GI bleeding, specific reversal agents (idarucizumab for dabigatran, andexanet for anti-factor Xa inhibitors) should be considered 4, 2.
  • DOACs should be interrupted at presentation in patients with acute GI bleeding 2.

Critical Pitfall to Avoid

Do not extrapolate TXA's proven benefit in trauma and postpartum hemorrhage to GI bleeding. The mechanism of bleeding differs fundamentally—GI bleeding involves mucosal lesions requiring endoscopic or interventional therapy, not the diffuse coagulopathy seen in trauma where TXA is effective 1. The HALT-IT trial definitively closed the door on this extrapolation 1.

Note on Low-Dose TXA

While some older, smaller studies suggested low-dose or enteral TXA might reduce rebleeding and need for surgery (RR 0.5 for rebleeding, RR 0.58 for surgery) 3, these findings are based on moderate-certainty evidence from trials conducted before modern endoscopic techniques. The risk-benefit profile remains unfavorable given the thromboembolic risks 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.