What ongoing clinical trials are available for patients with endometrial cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ongoing Clinical Trials in Endometrial Cancer

The most clinically relevant ongoing trial mentioned in the evidence is PORTEC 3, which compares concurrent chemoradiation plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus pelvic radiation alone in high-risk and advanced-stage endometrial carcinoma. 1

High-Risk and Advanced-Stage Disease Trials

PORTEC 3 Study

This intergroup trial by the Dutch Cooperative Gynaecologic Oncology Group and UK NCRI is evaluating combined modality treatment for patients with:

  • Stage IB grade 3 with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) 1
  • Stage IC or IIA grade 3 1
  • Stage IIB 1
  • Stage III disease 1
  • Stage IB, IC, II or III with serous or clear cell histology 1

The trial design compares radiotherapy with concomitant and sequential chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus pelvic radiation alone. 1 This study was designed to resolve conflicting data from Italian and Japanese trials that failed to show survival differences between chemotherapy and radiotherapy. 1

Advanced/Recurrent Disease Trials

GOG-209

This randomized trial is evaluating combination chemotherapy regimens with or without taxanes for advanced or recurrent disease. 1 The trial builds on prior evidence showing that addition of paclitaxel to combination chemotherapy improved progression-free survival (HR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.71–0.90; P = 0.004), though with increased toxicity. 1

Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy Trials

Bevacizumab Combination Trials

GOG-86P evaluated the addition of bevacizumab, temsirolimus, or ixabepilone to first-line paclitaxel-carboplatin in 349 patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. 1 Bevacizumab showed superior median overall survival compared to historical controls (34.0 versus 22.7 months, P < 0.039). 1

MITO END-2 trial added bevacizumab to 6-8 cycles of paclitaxel-carboplatin followed by bevacizumab maintenance in 108 patients. 1 This resulted in significant improvement in median progression-free survival (13 versus 8.7 months, P = 0.036) and numerical increase in median overall survival (23.5 versus 18 months, P = 0.24). 1

Biomarker-Driven Trials

Trials targeting PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway, RAS-MAPK, angiogenesis (especially FGFR2 and VEGF/VEGFR), ER/PgR, and homologous recombination deficiency/MSI are warranted. 1 These molecular alterations are present in endometrial cancer and represent promising therapeutic targets. 1

Novel Trial Designs

GOG0261 is evaluating paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus ifosfamide in patients with different types of gynecological carcinosarcomas (NCT00954174). 1 A randomized phase II trial of nintedanib versus chemotherapy in patients with recurrent clear-cell carcinoma of the ovary or endometrium (EudraCT 2013-002109-73) is also ongoing. 1

Key Trial Design Considerations

Novel trial designs using alternative early endpoints are being employed, such as the percentage of patients free from progression at 18 weeks, since tumor response to biological agents may not occur to the same degree as with chemotherapy. 1 Better patient selection using systematic biomarker integration and earlier characterization with standardized diagnostic imaging and biomarker assessments are essential. 1

Trials should be biomarker-driven with biopsy at entry, as progress in targeted therapy development is likely to be faster with this approach. 1 The presence of a specific biomarker target may not always reflect probability of response, as demonstrated by phase II studies of mTOR inhibitors showing no correlation between response and PI3K/AKT pathway mutations. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.