What should be included in a comprehensive presentation on electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities?

Comprehensive Presentation on ECG Abnormalities

Core Framework for ECG Abnormality Presentation

Your presentation should be structured around a systematic approach that distinguishes normal variants from pathological findings, emphasizes clinical context, and provides clear diagnostic and management pathways for each abnormality. 1

---

Essential Content Sections

1. Technical Foundations and Quality Assessment

• Begin by addressing ECG acquisition standards: High-frequency response must be ≥150 Hz for adults to maintain diagnostic precision, as inadequate response causes systematic underestimation of signal amplitude and smoothing of critical features like Q waves 2
• Emphasize that computer interpretations are adjuncts only: Computer analysis correctly classifies only 0-94% of disorders, with arrhythmias being most problematic; physician verification is mandatory for all clinical decisions 1
• Include common technical pitfalls: Electrode misplacement (particularly precordial leads), inadequate filtering, and artifact recognition significantly alter interpretation and lead to false diagnoses 2

2. Systematic Interpretation Algorithm

Present a step-by-step approach that clinicians can follow algorithmically:

• Rate calculation: Count QRS complexes in 6-second strip and multiply by 10, or use 300 divided by number of large boxes between R waves 2
• Rhythm identification: Sinus rhythm requires P wave before each QRS with consistent PR interval; note any irregularities suggesting atrial fibrillation or premature beats 2
• Interval measurements: PR interval (normal 120-200 ms), QRS duration (normal <120 ms), QTc using Bazett's formula (normal <450 ms men, <460 ms women) 2
• Axis determination: Use leads I and aVF to identify normal axis (+90° to -30°), left axis deviation (-30° to -90°), right axis deviation (+90° to +180°), or extreme deviation 2
• Chamber enlargement: Apply voltage criteria (LVH: S in V1 + R in V5 or V6 >3.5 mV using Sokolow-Lyon) 2
• Ischemia/injury/infarction: ST elevation >0.1 mV in limb leads or >0.15-0.2 mV in precordial leads, T-wave abnormalities, pathological Q waves >0.04 seconds or >25% of R wave amplitude 2

3. Critical Abnormal Findings Requiring Urgent Action

Dedicate substantial content to life-threatening patterns:

T-Wave Inversion Patterns

• Abnormal TWI is ≥1 mm depth in two or more contiguous leads (excluding aVR, III, V1) in anterior, lateral, inferolateral, or inferior territories 1
• Lateral/inferolateral TWI (V5-V6, I, aVL): Associated with quiescent cardiomyopathy in considerable proportion of athletes; requires comprehensive investigation including echocardiography and CMR if non-diagnostic 1
• Right precordial TWI (V1-V3): Common in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC); highly specific ECG marker 1
• Inferior/lateral TWI: Common in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) 1
• Normal exceptions: TWI confined to V1-V4 in Black athletes when preceded by J point/ST elevation; TWI in V1-V3 in athletes <16 years 1

Wellens Syndrome

• Deep symmetrical T-wave inversion in anterior chest leads indicates critical proximal LAD stenosis and represents a pre-infarction state requiring urgent intervention 3
• Management algorithm: Treat as high-risk NSTE-ACS, initiate ECG monitoring immediately, administer aspirin 162-325 mg, implement primary PCI within 120 minutes of first medical contact 3
• Critical pitfall: Do not confuse with cerebrovascular accidents, cardiomyopathy, or other non-ischemic causes of T-wave inversion 3

Ventricular Pre-excitation (WPW)

• Requires exercise ECG test: Abrupt cessation of delta wave on exercise denotes low-risk pathway 1
• Consider EP study for risk assessment if low-risk pathway cannot be confirmed non-invasively, particularly for moderate to high-intensity sports 1

Prolonged QTc

• QTc ≥500 ms warrants direct referral to heart rhythm specialist or sports cardiologist 1
• Evaluation includes: Repeat resting ECG on separate day, exercise ECG test, electrolyte screening, family screening, genetic testing, and ECGs of first-degree relatives 1

Brugada Type 1 Pattern

• Immediate referral to cardiologist or heart rhythm specialist 1
• Consider high precordial lead ECG with V1 and V2 in 2nd intercostal space or sodium channel blockade if pattern is indeterminate 1
• Include genetic testing and family screening 1

4. Conduction Abnormalities

Present a clear hierarchy of severity:

• Profound sinus bradycardia <30 bpm: Repeat ECG after mild aerobic activity; consider additional testing based on clinical suspicion 1
• Profound 1° AV block ≥400 ms: Repeat ECG after mild aerobic activity 1
• Advanced 2° or 3° AV block: Requires echocardiography, minimum 24-hour ECG monitor, exercise ECG test; consider laboratory screening and CMR based on findings 1

5. Arrhythmias

Categorize by urgency and required workup:

Multiple Premature Ventricular Contractions

• If >2,000 PVCs or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia: Comprehensive cardiac testing including CMR warranted to investigate myocardial disease 1
• Differential includes: HCM, dilated cardiomyopathy, left ventricular noncompaction, ARVC, myocarditis, sarcoidosis 1
• Initial evaluation: Echocardiography, 24-hour ECG monitor, exercise ECG test, consider signal-averaged ECG 1

Atrial Tachyarrhythmias

• Workup includes: Echocardiography, minimum 24-hour ECG monitor, exercise ECG test 1
• Consider CMR or EP study based on clinical suspicion 1

Ventricular Arrhythmias (couplets, triplets, accelerated ventricular rhythm, NSVT)

• Comprehensive cardiac evaluation required: Echocardiography, CMR, minimum 24-hour ECG monitor, exercise ECG test to rule out myocardial disease and primary electrical disease 1

6. Clinical Context Integration

Emphasize that ECG interpretation cannot occur in isolation:

• Clinical context is mandatory for accurate interpretation: The same ECG finding has different implications depending on symptoms 2, 4
• Prior clinical exposure significantly impacts diagnostic accuracy: Clinicians are more likely to make correct diagnoses for conditions they have encountered during training (OR 1.46-1.58) 4
• Serial ECGs are essential: When initial ECG is non-diagnostic but clinical suspicion remains high, particularly for acute coronary syndrome 3, 5
• Approximately 5% of patients with normal initial ECGs discharged from emergency departments ultimately have acute MI or unstable angina 3, 5

7. Special Populations

Athletes

• Normal variants in athletes include: Sinus bradycardia ≥30 bpm, voltage criteria for LVH, early repolarization, incomplete RBBB 1, 2
• Temporary restriction from athletic activity should be considered for athletes with abnormal ECGs of uncertain clinical significance until secondary investigations completed 1
• Two or more borderline ECG findings: Requires echocardiography and additional testing based on clinical suspicion 1

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

• ECG can be normal at presentation in 6% of patients in referral cohort studies 1
• Typical findings: Variable combination of LVH, ST- and T-wave abnormalities, pathological Q-waves 1
• Ambulatory monitoring: NSVT at 120-200 BPM occurs in 25% of adults with HCM; paroxysmal supraventricular arrhythmias in up to 38% 1

8. Indications for ECG Ordering

Include clear Class I indications:

• Immediate ECG required for: Chest pain, syncope, dizziness, palpitations, dyspnea 5
• Preoperative ECG: All patients >40 years undergoing any surgery; all patients with known cardiovascular disease undergoing cardiac or noncardiac surgery 5
• Drug monitoring: Before and during therapy with cardioactive drugs (antiarrhythmics) to evaluate QRS duration, QT prolongation, or proarrhythmia 5
• Chemotherapy monitoring: Serial ECG monitoring for doxorubicin or other cardiotoxic agents 5
• Post-procedure: After coronary angioplasty, intracardiac procedures, pacemaker insertion or revision 5

9. Competency and Training Considerations

Address the educational component:

• Initial competency requires: Knowledge of pathophysiology of electrocardiographic abnormalities, skills to recognize common normal/abnormal patterns, and opportunity to apply knowledge in bedside clinical decision-making 1
• Competency determination should be based on: Periodic objective assessment and documentation of interpretation skills in clinical context rather than minimum number of interpretations 1
• Maintenance of competency: Reading 100 ECGs yearly; continuing medical education through seminars or self-assessment programs, particularly for physicians who read ECGs infrequently 1, 2
• Major interpretation errors are common (4-33%), but adverse patient outcomes are rare (<1% of interpretations) 1

10. Common Pitfalls to Emphasize Throughout

Dedicate slides to avoiding these critical errors:

• Over-reliance on computer interpretation: Errors remain common; physician verification is non-negotiable 1, 2
• Failure to compare with previous ECGs: Missing important changes when prior tracings are available 2
• Interpreting ECG findings in isolation: Without clinical context leads to inappropriate management decisions 2, 4
• Electrode misplacement: Particularly precordial leads, which significantly alters interpretation 2
• Inadequate filtering settings: Distorts waveforms and affects measurements 2
• Missing serial ECGs: When initial ECG is equivocal or non-diagnostic 3, 5

---

Presentation Structure Recommendation

Organize your slides to flow from basic principles → systematic interpretation → specific abnormalities by urgency → special populations → clinical integration. Use case examples with actual ECG tracings for each major abnormality category, emphasizing the diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, required workup, and management pathway. Include interactive elements where audience members practice systematic interpretation using the algorithm presented. 1, 2, 6