Why Colistin Should Not Be Given as Monotherapy
Colistin monotherapy rapidly selects for resistant bacterial subpopulations, making combination therapy the standard of care for severe multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections. 1
The Core Problem: Rapid Resistance Development
The fundamental issue with colistin monotherapy is its propensity to select resistant subpopulations during treatment:
- Colistin monotherapy rapidly selects resistant subpopulations, which is the primary reason combination therapy is advised for clinical use 1
- This resistance development occurs even during active treatment, compromising therapeutic efficacy and limiting future treatment options 2
Current Guideline-Based Recommendations
For Severe Infections Requiring Colistin
The most recent high-quality guidelines (2022-2025) provide pathogen-specific recommendations:
- For carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA): Combination therapy with two in vitro active drugs (including colistin) is strongly recommended 3, 4
- For carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB): Combination therapy with two in vitro active antibiotics is suggested for severe and high-risk infections 4, 5
- For carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE): Colistin should be used in combination with at least one additional agent to which the pathogen is susceptible 3
When Monotherapy May Be Acceptable
The 2022 ESCMID guidelines make a nuanced distinction:
- Colistin monotherapy is recommended only for non-severe infections or low-risk infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria 4
- This represents a pragmatic approach balancing resistance prevention with antibiotic stewardship in less critical situations 4
Evidence from High-Quality Trials
Despite the theoretical concerns about monotherapy, recent randomized controlled trials have shown mixed results:
- The OVERCOME trial (high-quality RCT) showed no significant difference in 28-day mortality between colistin monotherapy and colistin-meropenem combination for hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia and bloodstream infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria 4
- The AIDA RCT demonstrated no advantage of colistin-meropenem over colistin monotherapy for CRAB infections regarding clinical failure or 14-day mortality 4
- However, microbiological eradication was significantly higher with combination therapy in some studies, even when clinical outcomes were similar 6
The Disconnect: Clinical Outcomes vs. Resistance Prevention
This creates an important clinical paradox:
- While combination therapy may not always improve mortality or clinical cure rates in individual patients, it serves a broader purpose of preventing resistance emergence that could compromise future treatment options 6, 2
- The theoretical benefit of preventing resistance development during therapy has not been definitively confirmed in clinical trials, but remains a compelling rationale 6
Practical Algorithm for Clinical Decision-Making
Use this approach when considering colistin therapy:
Assess infection severity:
Identify the pathogen and susceptibilities:
Ensure source control is achieved to optimize outcomes and shorten treatment duration 3, 4
Monitor for resistance development with follow-up cultures if treatment failure occurs 3, 5
Critical Dosing Considerations
When colistin is used (whether monotherapy or combination):
- Loading dose is essential: 9 MU (5 mg/kg) colistin methanesulfonate, followed by maintenance dosing of 4.5 MU twice daily for critically ill patients 3
- Without a loading dose, plasma concentrations remain insufficient before steady state is reached 3
- Unit conversion is critical: 1 million IU colistin methanesulfonate = 33 mg colistin base activity 3
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not use colistin-meropenem combination for CRAB - this is a strong recommendation against this specific combination based on high-certainty evidence from multiple RCTs 4, 5
- Do not skip the loading dose - suboptimal dosing has been linked to resistance development 7
- Do not ignore nephrotoxicity monitoring - regular renal function assessment is mandatory, though nephrotoxicity is generally reversible 7, 8
- Do not use monotherapy for severe infections - even if individual trial results are equivocal, the resistance prevention rationale remains compelling 1, 2