What is the best approach to relieve left upper quadrant pain in someone with pancreatic cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Celiac Plexus Neurolysis is the Best Option for Pancreatic Cancer Pain

For left upper quadrant pain in pancreatic cancer, celiac plexus neurolysis (option 2) is the recommended first-line interventional approach, with EUS-guided technique preferred over percutaneous methods. 1

Evidence-Based Rationale

Why Celiac Plexus Neurolysis is Superior

  • EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) is specifically recommended by consensus guidelines for patients suffering from pain due to unresectable upper abdominal cancer, particularly pancreatic cancer (Appropriate rating 8.0, High evidence level). 1

  • The procedure provides pain relief in approximately 70-80% of patients with pancreatic cancer, with effects lasting 3-6 months. 2, 3

  • Two randomized controlled trials demonstrated that celiac plexus neurolysis significantly improved pain relief compared to standard analgesic therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. 1

  • Pain relief persists in 76% of patients at 2-3 months post-procedure, with 24% experiencing substantial improvement (>50% pain reduction) and 14% achieving complete pain resolution. 4

Technical Approach

  • The EUS-guided approach is recommended over percutaneous image-guided techniques (Appropriate rating 9.0, Moderate evidence level) due to real-time imaging precision and color Doppler guidance to avoid vascular injury. 1

  • 10-20 mL of absolute ethanol is the recommended neurolytic agent for EUS-CPN (Appropriate rating 8.0, High evidence level). 1

  • EUS-guided celiac ganglia neurolysis (CGN) is recommended over single or bilateral injections around the celiac artery for improved pain relief (Appropriate rating 8.0, High evidence level). 1

  • Early EUS-CPN at the time of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration is recommended as it reduces pain and may moderate opioid consumption compared with best medical therapy (Appropriate rating 7.5, High evidence level). 1

Why Other Options Are Less Appropriate

Radiation Therapy (Option 1):

  • Radiation is mentioned only as a consideration for selected patients with severe local back pain, even in metastatic disease, but is not the primary recommendation for visceral pancreatic pain. 1
  • Provides only temporary relief in 40-80% of patients and is less effective than celiac plexus neurolysis. 5

Ketamine Infusion (Option 3):

  • Ketamine is mentioned only as an intrathecal option in refractory cases when other interventions have failed, not as first-line therapy. 5
  • No guideline evidence supports systemic ketamine infusion as primary treatment for pancreatic cancer pain.

Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (Option 4):

  • IDDS is reserved for refractory cases with inadequate pain relief despite systemic opioid escalation, failed celiac plexus neurolysis, and life expectancy >6 months. 5
  • Requires a trial with temporary catheter before permanent pump implantation and referral to interventional pain specialists. 5
  • ESMO guidelines position this as a last-resort option, not first-line therapy. 5

Safety Profile

  • Complications of EUS-CPN and CGN are generally minor and do not need specific treatment (Appropriate rating 8.0, Low evidence level). 1

  • Reported adverse events include hypotension (3%), transient severe pain (7%), and brief diarrhea episodes (10%). 4

  • The EUS approach avoids serious complications like paraplegia or pneumothorax associated with posterior percutaneous approaches. 6

Clinical Implementation Algorithm

  1. Confirm unresectable pancreatic cancer with severe pain despite pharmacological management. 1

  2. Perform EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis using 10-20 mL absolute ethanol, targeting celiac ganglia when identifiable. 1

  3. If ganglia cannot be identified, perform bilateral injections around the celiac artery (though ganglia-targeted approach is superior). 1

  4. Assess pain relief at 1-2 weeks and 2-3 months post-procedure using validated pain scales. 4

  5. If CPN fails or provides inadequate relief, consider intrathecal drug delivery system for patients with life expectancy >6 months. 5

  6. Reserve radiation therapy for patients with predominant local back pain or bone metastases. 1

Critical Caveats

  • Training in EUS-guided celiac plexus ablation is recommended in endoscopists experienced in EUS and EUS-FNA (Appropriate rating 9.0, Very Low evidence level). 1

  • The procedure should be performed at expert centers with facilities and expertise in interventional EUS. 1

  • Prophylactic antibiotics covering enteric gram-negative organisms and enterococci (second-generation cephalosporin or quinolone) are suggested when bupivacaine with steroids is used. 1

  • Neurolytic blocks typically produce effects lasting 3-6 months and should be limited to patients with short life expectancy. 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Celiac plexus block for pancreatic cancer pain in adults.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011

Guideline

Intrathecal Drug Delivery System for Refractory Pancreatic Cancer Pain

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Analgesic Management in Pancreatitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.