What is the comparison between Xarelto (rivaroxaban) and Eliquis (apixaban) for anticoagulation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Apixaban (Eliquis) is Superior to Rivaroxaban (Xarelto) for Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation

Based on the most recent high-quality evidence, apixaban should be preferred over rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation due to its superior safety profile with significantly lower major bleeding risk while maintaining equivalent stroke prevention efficacy. 1, 2

Efficacy Comparison: Equivalent Stroke Prevention

Both agents demonstrate similar effectiveness for preventing stroke and systemic embolism:

  • Direct head-to-head comparison from a large US administrative claims database (n=13,130 matched patients) found no difference in stroke or systemic embolism risk between apixaban and rivaroxaban (HR 1.05,95% CI 0.64-1.72) 2

  • Against warfarin, apixaban showed 21% reduction in stroke/systemic embolism (HR 0.79,95% CI 0.66-0.95) in the ARISTOTLE trial 3, 4

  • Rivaroxaban demonstrated noninferiority to warfarin (HR 0.88,95% CI 0.74-1.03) but failed to achieve superiority in intention-to-treat analysis (P=0.12) 3, 5

Safety Profile: Apixaban Has Clear Advantage

The critical difference lies in bleeding risk, where apixaban demonstrates substantial superiority:

  • Major bleeding risk is 50-61% lower with apixaban compared to rivaroxaban in direct comparisons (HR 0.39,95% CI 0.28-0.54, P<0.001) 2

  • Apixaban showed 31% reduction in major bleeding versus warfarin, while rivaroxaban had similar major bleeding rates to warfarin 3, 4

  • Intracranial hemorrhage risk is significantly lower with apixaban: 0.2% versus 0.5% for rivaroxaban annually 3

  • A Swedish real-world cohort (n=25,843) confirmed apixaban's favorable bleeding profile with 55% lower major bleeding risk versus rivaroxaban at reduced doses (HR 0.45,95% CI 0.33-0.61) 6

Mortality Benefit

  • Apixaban demonstrated lower all-cause mortality compared to warfarin (HR 0.89,95% CI 0.80-0.998) 3, 1

  • This mortality benefit, combined with superior bleeding safety, makes apixaban the preferred choice 1

Dosing Considerations

Apixaban requires twice-daily dosing (5 mg BID), while rivaroxaban is once-daily (20 mg QD) 4, 7:

  • Standard apixaban dose: 5 mg twice daily 4
  • Dose reduction to 2.5 mg twice daily if ≥2 criteria: age ≥80 years, weight ≤60 kg, or creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL 1, 4
  • Rivaroxaban: 20 mg once daily (15 mg if CrCl 30-49 mL/min) 3

Critical caveat: While once-daily dosing may theoretically improve adherence, missing a single dose of rivaroxaban creates a longer period without anticoagulation coverage compared to missing one dose of twice-daily apixaban 7

Special Populations

Severe renal impairment (CrCl 15-30 mL/min):

  • Apixaban maintains standard 5 mg twice daily dosing unless other dose reduction criteria are met 4
  • Rivaroxaban requires dose reduction to 15 mg daily 3
  • In stage 4-5 CKD or hemodialysis patients, rivaroxaban showed 32% reduction in major bleeding versus warfarin, but direct comparison with apixaban in this population is lacking 8

Clinical Implementation Algorithm

Choose apixaban as first-line agent for:

  • All patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation requiring anticoagulation 1
  • Patients at higher bleeding risk (elderly, prior bleeding, renal impairment) 1, 2
  • Patients where minimizing intracranial hemorrhage risk is paramount 3, 2

Consider rivaroxaban only if:

  • Patient demonstrates documented inability to adhere to twice-daily dosing despite counseling 7
  • Cost considerations make apixaban prohibitively expensive and patient can reliably take once-daily medication 3

Important Caveats

  • Neither agent has a readily available reversal agent in emergency bleeding situations 3
  • Both require dose adjustment based on renal function; regular monitoring of creatinine clearance is essential 1, 4
  • Gastrointestinal bleeding risk is elevated with both agents compared to warfarin, though less so with apixaban 3, 2
  • The American College of Cardiology specifically recommends apixaban as the preferred anticoagulant due to superior efficacy and safety profile 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.