What is the incidence of misdiagnosed radiographic nonunion more than one year after Lapidus (arthrodesis) surgery?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Research

Misdiagnosed radiographic nonunion after Lapidus surgery is relatively rare, occurring in approximately 2.7% of cases when evaluated one year post-surgery, as reported in the study by 1. This discrepancy happens because radiographic assessment alone can be misleading - X-rays may show what appears to be incomplete fusion even when the joint is clinically stable. The key issue is that radiographic nonunion doesn't necessarily correlate with clinical nonunion or poor outcomes. Many patients with apparent radiographic nonunion remain asymptomatic with good foot function. This occurs because fibrous tissue at the fusion site can provide adequate stability despite incomplete osseous bridging visible on imaging. For accurate assessment, surgeons should combine radiographic findings with clinical evaluation, including pain levels during midfoot manipulation and weight-bearing function. Some studies, such as 2 and 3, discuss the use of teriparatide in treating delayed union and nonunion, but these are not directly relevant to the question of misdiagnosed radiographic nonunion after Lapidus surgery. CT scans offer more detailed evaluation when there's uncertainty. Treatment decisions should be based primarily on clinical symptoms rather than imaging alone, as asymptomatic radiographic nonunions typically don't require revision surgery. This distinction is important because unnecessary revision surgeries for stable, asymptomatic radiographic nonunions can lead to complications without improving patient outcomes. Some key points to consider include:

  • The union rate of the modified Lapidus procedure is higher than previously reported when performed with rigid cross screw fixation, meticulous joint preparation, and shear-strain-relieved bone graft, as shown in 1.
  • Nonunion of the first tarsometatarsal joint should be considered an infrequent occurrence, according to 1.
  • The use of teriparatide in treating delayed union and nonunion is a topic of ongoing research, as discussed in 2 and 3, but is not directly relevant to the question of misdiagnosed radiographic nonunion after Lapidus surgery.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.