What is the optimal blood pressure management strategy for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage based on the ATACH 2 (Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage 2) trial?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 14, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ATACH-2 Trial: Blood Pressure Management in Intracerebral Hemorrhage

The ATACH-2 trial demonstrated that intensive blood pressure lowering to a target of 110-139 mmHg does NOT improve outcomes compared to standard reduction (140-179 mmHg) and is associated with increased renal adverse events, fundamentally changing clinical practice to favor a more moderate blood pressure target of 130-140 mmHg. 1

Key Trial Findings

The ATACH-2 trial enrolled 1,000 patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥180 mmHg, randomizing them to intensive (110-139 mmHg) versus standard (140-179 mmHg) SBP reduction using IV nicardipine within 4.5 hours of symptom onset 1. The trial was stopped early for futility after demonstrating:

  • No difference in death or disability at 3 months: 38.7% in intensive group vs 37.7% in standard group (RR 1.04,95% CI 0.85-1.27) 1
  • Significantly higher renal adverse events in the intensive group: 9.0% vs 4.0% (p=0.002) 1
  • The mean minimum SBP achieved in the intensive group was 129 mmHg 2

Current Evidence-Based Blood Pressure Targets

For patients with mild-to-moderate ICH (GCS ≥5, volume <30 mL) presenting with SBP 150-220 mmHg, target SBP of 130-140 mmHg is safe and may improve functional outcomes 2. This recommendation synthesizes findings from both ATACH-2 and INTERACT-2 trials 2.

Critical Thresholds to Avoid

  • DO NOT lower SBP below 130 mmHg - this is classified as Class 3: Harm by the American Heart Association and is associated with worse outcomes 2
  • DO NOT lower SBP below 130 mmHg even in patients with very high baseline pressures (>220 mmHg), as this increases neurological deterioration and renal adverse events without reducing hematoma expansion 2

Timing of Blood Pressure Reduction

Initiate treatment within 2 hours of ICH onset and achieve target within 1 hour to maximize potential benefit 2, 3. Post-hoc analysis of ATACH-2 showed that treatment within 2 hours was associated with lower risk of hematoma expansion and improved 90-day outcomes compared to later treatment 2.

Implementation Strategy

Medication Selection

  • Intravenous nicardipine was the agent used in ATACH-2, starting at 5 mg/hour with titration 2, 4
  • Labetalol is recommended as first-line alternative (5-20 mg IV bolus every 15 minutes or 2 mg/min infusion) 4
  • Use agents with rapid onset and short duration to facilitate smooth titration and minimize blood pressure variability 2

Titration Principles

Ensure continuous, smooth, and sustained blood pressure control while avoiding large variability in SBP 2. Post-hoc analyses demonstrated that increased SBP variability during the first 24 hours is linearly associated with death and severe disability 2. Continuous infusion is preferred over intermittent boluses 5.

Special Populations and Caveats

Large or Severe ICH

For patients with large ICH (>30 mL), GCS <13, or requiring surgical decompression, the safety and efficacy of intensive blood pressure lowering are not well established 2. In these patients:

  • Maintain cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) ≥60-70 mmHg 2, 4, 3
  • Consider ICP monitoring when CPP may be compromised 2
  • Post-hoc analysis showed intensive BP reduction reduced hematoma expansion in moderate-to-severe ICH but did not improve functional outcomes 6

Very High Baseline Blood Pressure (>220 mmHg)

Exercise caution in patients presenting with SBP >220 mmHg 2. Post-hoc analysis of ATACH-2 showed these patients (22.8% of cohort) had higher rates of neurological deterioration at 24 hours and renal adverse events with intensive lowering, without benefit in reducing hematoma expansion or improving outcomes 2.

Deep vs Lobar ICH

Intensive blood pressure reduction appears more effective in deep ICH compared to lobar ICH 7. Exploratory analysis showed intensive BP reduction decreased hematoma expansion risk (OR 0.60) in deep ICH but not in lobar ICH (OR 0.91) 7.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Excessive acute drops in SBP (>70 mmHg) are associated with acute renal injury and early neurological deterioration 2
  • Venous vasodilators like nitroprusside should be avoided as they may worsen intracranial pressure and hemostasis 2, 4
  • Failure to monitor CPP in patients with elevated ICP or large hematomas can lead to cerebral hypoperfusion 2, 4
  • Intermittent bolus dosing creates blood pressure variability that worsens outcomes 2

Reconciling ATACH-2 with INTERACT-2

The apparent discrepancy between trials is explained by different target ranges 2:

  • INTERACT-2 targeted <140 mmHg but stopped treatment at <130 mmHg, achieving mean minimum SBP of 150 mmHg and showed modest benefit 2
  • ATACH-2 targeted 110-139 mmHg, achieving mean minimum SBP of 129 mmHg and showed no benefit with increased harm 1
  • The "sweet spot" appears to be 130-140 mmHg - aggressive enough to potentially reduce hematoma expansion but not so low as to cause harm 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Blood Pressure Management in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of PRN Blood Pressure in Intracranial Hemorrhage

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Blood Pressure in Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.