What is the normal cup to disc ratio in a healthy eye?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 14, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Normal Cup-to-Disc Ratio

The normal cup-to-disc ratio in a healthy eye averages approximately 0.3-0.4, with almost all normal eyes having a ratio of 0.7 or less. 1

Specific Normal Values by Measurement Method

  • Hruby lens/biomicroscopic examination: Mean cup-to-disc ratio of 0.38 1
  • Direct ophthalmoscopy: Mean cup-to-disc ratio of 0.25 1
  • Upper limit of normal: Cup-to-disc ratios of 0.7 or greater should be viewed with suspicion for glaucomatous damage 1

The Hruby lens or biomicroscopic lens consistently provides slightly larger measurements than direct ophthalmoscopy (typically 0.1-0.2 difference), but should be used to determine the fullest extent of cup contour. 1

Critical Adjustment for Disc Size

Cup-to-disc ratio must be interpreted in the context of optic disc diameter, as disc size significantly affects what constitutes "normal." 2

  • Small discs (1.1-1.3 mm): Median cup-to-disc ratio of 0.35, with 97.5th percentile at 0.59 2
  • Large discs (1.8-2.0 mm): Median cup-to-disc ratio of 0.55, with 97.5th percentile at 0.74 2
  • This represents a 0.2 increase in both median and 97.5th percentile values from small to large discs 2

One quarter of all optic discs fall into small or large categories, making disc size estimation essential for accurate interpretation. 2 A small cup in a small disc can indicate advanced glaucomatous damage, while a large cup in a large disc may be entirely normal. 3

Age Considerations

There is a tendency toward increasing cup-to-disc ratio with advancing age, though no strong linear relationship exists. 1

Suspicious Features Requiring Further Evaluation

Any of the following warrant glaucoma evaluation:

  • Cup-to-disc ratio ≥0.7 1
  • Vertical cup-to-disc ratio larger than horizontal ratio (present in only 10% of normal eyes, and rarely differs by ≥0.2) 1
  • Disparity >0.2 between direct ophthalmoscope and biomicroscopic lens measurements 1
  • Oval cups (present in only 9% of normal eyes) 1

Clinical Context: When Small Cup-to-Disc Ratio Matters

Patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension have significantly smaller cup-to-disc ratios (average 0.13-0.14) compared to normal populations, which may lower the threshold for developing optic disc edema. 4 Similarly, a small cup-to-disc ratio is an established risk factor for non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. 4

Risk Factor for Glaucoma

A larger cup-to-disc ratio is an established independent risk factor for developing primary open-angle glaucoma in at-risk patients. 5 Progressive enlargement over time, particularly with elevated intraocular pressure, suggests glaucomatous cupping and requires immediate assessment including IOP measurement, gonioscopy, and evaluation for disc hemorrhages. 6

References

Research

The normal cup-disk ratio.

American journal of ophthalmology, 1981

Research

The normalised rim/disc area ratio line.

International ophthalmology, 1995

Research

Cup-to-disc ratio in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension is smaller than that in normal subjects.

Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society, 2010

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Cup-to-Disc Ratio and Glaucoma Risk

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.