What is the prevalence of acid peptic disorders?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prevalence of Acid Peptic Disorders

The global lifetime prevalence of peptic ulcer disease is 5-10% in the general population, with an annual incidence of 0.1-0.3%. 1

Current Global Burden

The epidemiological landscape of acid peptic disorders shows distinct patterns:

  • Peptic ulcer disease affects 5-10% of the general population over their lifetime, with complications occurring in 10-20% of these patients 1
  • The annual incidence ranges from 0.1% to 0.3% in the general population 1
  • Hemorrhage is the most common complication, with an annual incidence of 0.02-0.06% in the general population and a 30-day mortality of 8.6% 1
  • Perforation occurs less frequently (annual incidence 0.004-0.014%) but carries a higher 30-day mortality of 23.5%, with a perforation-to-bleeding ratio of approximately 1:6 1

Historical Context and Changing Epidemiology

The burden of acid peptic disease has evolved significantly:

  • In the 1970s, the United States saw approximately 500,000 new peptic ulcer cases annually, resulting in over 400,000 hospitalizations, 4 million hospital days, 140,000 operations, and 9,000 hospital deaths per year 1
  • The lifetime risk of peptic ulcer among those with H. pylori infection is approximately 17% (1 in 6 individuals) 1
  • Between 1990 and 2021, global incidence and prevalence cases increased by 11.1% and 8.8% respectively, though age-standardized rates decreased by 40.3% and 41.1% during the same period 2
  • Deaths and disability-adjusted life years decreased by 15.94% and 27.8% respectively between 1990 and 2021, reflecting improved management 2

Gender and Age Distribution

Significant demographic disparities exist:

  • Men exhibit higher numbers and age-standardized rates of incidence, prevalence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years compared to women across most age cohorts 2
  • The disease burden is highest in middle-aged populations, with 53% of affected individuals in one Pakistani study being middle-aged 3

Geographic Variation

  • Substantial geographical disparities persist, with prevalence varying significantly between countries based on H. pylori infection rates, socioeconomic factors, and access to healthcare 2
  • In a managed care population study, chronic acid-related disorders affected 2.3% of adults, with gastroesophageal reflux disease comprising 59% of cases and dyspepsia 35% 4

Clinical and Economic Impact

The burden extends beyond prevalence numbers:

  • Approximately 5-50% of people with peptic ulcer disease require time off work, with 82% experiencing overall work impairment 1
  • The condition represents significant healthcare costs, though specific figures vary by region and healthcare system 1, 4
  • Self-medication is highly prevalent, with one study showing 62.6% of patients with acid peptic disease practicing self-medication, primarily using proton pump inhibitors (43.1%) and antacids (23.6%) 3

Risk Factors Contributing to Prevalence

  • Smoking remains the primary risk factor associated with peptic ulcer disease-related disability-adjusted life years and deaths in both sexes 2
  • H. pylori infection is present in 85-100% of duodenal ulcers and 70-90% of gastric ulcers, making it the dominant etiological factor 5
  • NSAID use, alcohol consumption, and stress contribute to the overall disease burden 1

Future Projections

  • Global age-standardized rates for incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years are projected to continue decreasing from 2022 to 2040 for both sexes, based on ARIMA modeling 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.