Cephalosporin Classification and Typical Dosages
Cephalosporins are categorized into four generations based on their spectrum of antimicrobial activity, with each generation offering distinct advantages for treating specific bacterial infections. 1, 2
First-Generation Cephalosporins
First-generation agents provide the strongest activity against gram-positive organisms, particularly staphylococci and streptococci, but have limited gram-negative coverage. 3, 4
Cephalexin (oral): 250-500 mg every 6 hours; for streptococcal pharyngitis and uncomplicated skin infections, 500 mg every 12 hours is acceptable 5
Cefazolin (IV): Most commonly used first-generation parenteral agent, particularly effective against sensitive staphylococci and streptococci 3
- Used in combination with metronidazole for mild-to-moderate intra-abdominal infections 6
Second-Generation Cephalosporins
Second-generation cephalosporins have enhanced activity against β-lactamase-producing organisms, particularly H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis, making them superior for respiratory tract infections. 7, 3
Cefuroxime: 500 mg PO twice daily for outpatient infections; 1.5 g IV every 8 hours for pneumonia 7
- Recommended for moderate-to-severe diabetic foot infections and intra-abdominal infections when combined with metronidazole 6
Cefaclor: 500 mg PO three times daily 7
- Important caveat: Higher risk of serum sickness-like reactions compared to other second-generation agents 7
Cefprozil: 500 mg PO every 12 hours, with good activity against β-lactamase-producing organisms 7
Cefoxitin: 1-2 g IV every 8 hours 7
Third-Generation Cephalosporins
Third-generation agents provide excellent gram-negative coverage, including Enterobacteriaceae, and are the preferred cephalosporins for serious infections and those requiring CNS penetration. 1, 2
Ceftriaxone: 1-2 g IV daily (once-daily dosing advantage) 3
Cefotaxime: 1-2 g IV every 8 hours 6
- Similar indications to ceftriaxone; recommended with metronidazole for intra-abdominal infections 6
Ceftazidime: 2 g IV every 8 hours 6
Ceftizoxime: Described as the "workhorse" third-generation cephalosporin 1
Fourth-Generation Cephalosporins
Fourth-generation agents provide excellent activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens, including antibiotic-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. 1, 8
- Cefepime: 2 g IV every 8-12 hours 6
Advanced Cephalosporin Combinations
Newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations provide enhanced coverage against multidrug-resistant organisms. 6
Ceftazidime/avibactam: 2.5 g IV every 8 hours 6
- Effective against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas 6
Ceftolozane/tazobactam: 1.5 g IV every 8 hours (3 g every 8 hours for hospital-acquired pneumonia) 6
- Specifically indicated for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas infections 6
Clinical Selection Algorithm
When selecting a cephalosporin, prioritize based on infection severity, anatomic site, and anticipated pathogens: 6
Mild infections with gram-positive organisms: First-generation agents (cephalexin, cefazolin) 6
Respiratory infections or β-lactamase producers: Second-generation agents (cefuroxime, cefprozil) 7, 3
- Critical pitfall: First-generation cephalosporins have poor H. influenzae coverage and are inappropriate for respiratory infections 7
Serious gram-negative infections or CNS involvement: Third-generation agents (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime) 6
- For suspected meningitis: Third-generation cephalosporins are mandatory over second-generation agents 7
Anaerobic coverage needed: Cefoxitin (second-generation) or add metronidazole to other cephalosporins 6, 7
Multidrug-resistant organisms: Fourth-generation agents or advanced combinations (ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam) 6
Important Resistance Considerations
Bacterial resistance patterns must guide empiric therapy, particularly for B. fragilis and Enterobacteriaceae. 6
B. fragilis demonstrates substantial resistance to cefoxitin and cefotetan; these should not be used alone when B. fragilis is likely 6
Local susceptibility profiles should be reviewed before using ampicillin-based regimens due to increasing E. coli resistance 6
Consider local resistance patterns for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae when selecting empiric therapy 7