Difference Between AKI and AKD
AKI (Acute Kidney Injury) is an abrupt decrease in kidney function occurring over 7 days or less, while AKD (Acute Kidney Disease) is a broader term that encompasses AKI plus any kidney dysfunction or damage lasting between 7 and 90 days—essentially, AKI is a subset of AKD. 1
Temporal Definitions
AKI represents the acute phase (≤7 days):
- Defined by rapid changes in serum creatinine: rise of ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours, OR ≥50% increase from baseline within 7 days 2
- Alternatively diagnosed by urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for ≥6 hours 2
- Focuses specifically on functional criteria (creatinine and urine output) without incorporating structural damage markers 1
AKD captures the subacute phase (7-90 days):
- Includes all patients meeting AKI criteria PLUS those with kidney abnormalities not severe enough to meet AKI thresholds 1
- Defined as acute or subacute kidney damage and/or loss of function for 7-90 days after an AKI initiating event 2
- Can occur with OR without preceding AKI 1
- If AKD persists beyond 90 days, it transitions to chronic kidney disease (CKD) 2
The Critical Conceptual Relationship
AKI is included within AKD, not separate from it:
- Think of AKD as the umbrella term capturing all kidney dysfunction <90 days duration with health implications 1
- This framework recognizes that patients can have significant kidney abnormalities (structural or functional) that don't meet the strict AKI criteria but still require clinical attention 1
- The term AKD was specifically created to fill the gap between AKI and CKD definitions 1
Clinical Significance and Outcomes
AKD without AKI is surprisingly common and dangerous:
- AKD not associated with AKI is nearly 3 times more prevalent than AKI itself 1
- Patients with AKD without AKI have an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.26 for the composite outcome of incident CKD, kidney failure, or death 1
- Patients with AKD post-AKI have even worse outcomes with an adjusted HR of 2.51 1
Both conditions carry significant mortality and morbidity risks:
- AKD in combination with CKD confers the highest risk of CKD progression and kidney failure 1
- CKD in combination with AKI confers the highest risk of death 1
- Even small increases in serum creatinine (≥0.3 mg/dL) in AKI are associated with approximately fourfold increase in hospital mortality 2
Practical Clinical Implications
Why this distinction matters in real practice:
- A patient whose creatinine rises slowly over 2 weeks (not meeting the 48-hour or 7-day AKI criteria) still has AKD and requires intervention 1
- Community-acquired AKD often goes undetected because it doesn't meet dramatic AKI criteria, yet has long-term health implications 1
- The AKD framework allows clinicians to capture and manage patients in the recovery or progression phase after AKI who still have ongoing kidney dysfunction 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Don't assume normal creatinine means no kidney disease:
- Patients can have structural kidney damage (abnormal urinalysis, proteinuria, imaging findings) without meeting functional AKI criteria—this is still AKD 1
- Relying solely on serum creatinine without considering urine output criteria may miss AKI cases 2
Don't discharge AKI patients without recognizing AKD risk:
- Approximately 25% of AKI survivors develop AKD 3
- These patients need structured follow-up between 7-90 days to monitor for progression to CKD 3
Don't confuse the timeline: