What is the interpretation of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) antibody test results, including EBV Viral Capsid Antigen (VCA) Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG), and EBV Nuclear Antigen Antibody (EBNA) IgG?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

These lab results indicate a past Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection that is not currently active, as evidenced by the negative EBV VCA IgM antibody (<36.0 U/mL) and highly positive EBV VCA IgG and EBV Nuclear Antigen IgG antibodies (>600.0 U/mL) 1. The presence of VCA IgM antibodies is typically associated with recent primary infection, but in this case, the negative result suggests that the infection is not recent 1. The high levels of EBV VCA IgG and EBV Nuclear Antigen IgG antibodies indicate long-term immunity to EBV, which is consistent with normal immunity developed by most adults over their lifetime 1. It is essential to note that the high antibody levels do not indicate any current illness and are simply a marker of the immune system's previous encounter with the virus. No specific treatment is needed for past EBV infections, as the virus remains dormant in most people without causing problems. The pattern of negative EBV VCA IgM and positive EBV VCA IgG and EBV Nuclear Antigen IgG antibodies is common in individuals who had mononucleosis ("mono") or an asymptomatic EBV infection months to years ago 1. In clinical practice, the diagnosis of EBV infection is often guided by the presence of clinical symptoms, such as fever, sore throat, and lymphadenopathy, in addition to laboratory test results 1. The laboratory diagnosis of EBV infection may involve additional tests, such as heterophile antibody tests or NAAT, to confirm the diagnosis and rule out other causes of mononucleosis-like illnesses 1. However, in this case, the lab results provide sufficient evidence to indicate a past EBV infection that is not currently active. Key points to consider in the interpretation of these lab results include:

  • The negative EBV VCA IgM antibody result indicates no recent or acute infection
  • The highly positive EBV VCA IgG and EBV Nuclear Antigen IgG antibodies indicate long-term immunity to EBV
  • The high antibody levels do not indicate any current illness
  • No specific treatment is needed for past EBV infections.

From the Research

Interpretation of EBV Serological Results

The provided serological results for EBV antibodies can be interpreted based on the reference ranges and units provided.

  • EBV Ab VCA, IgM: <36.0 U/mL is considered negative, 36.0 - 43.9 U/mL is equivocal, and >43.9 U/mL is positive 2, 3.
  • EBV Ab VCA, IgG: <18.0 U/mL is considered negative, 18.0 - 21.9 U/mL is equivocal, and >21.9 U/mL is positive 2, 3.
  • EBV Nuclear Antigen Ab, IgG: <18.0 U/mL is considered negative, 18.0 - 21.9 U/mL is equivocal, and >21.9 U/mL is positive 2, 3.

Diagnostic Approaches

To distinguish between acute and past EBV infection, the presence of VCA IgM and VCA IgG without EBNA-1 IgG indicates acute infection, whereas the presence of VCA IgG and EBNA-1 IgG without VCA IgM is typical of past infection 2.

  • The use of IgG avidity measurement can aid in the diagnosis of primary EBV infection, as low-avidity IgG anti-VCA is typically seen in recent infection 3.
  • A study evaluating the Architect EBV antibody panel demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing primary, past, and absent EBV infection 4.

Serological Patterns

The interpretation of EBV serological patterns can be challenging due to the various possible combinations of antibodies 5.

  • A study utilizing a large population of patients developed evidence-based tools for interpreting EBV results, including easy-to-use tables for interpreting serological patterns based on three or five markers 5.

Related Questions

What are the management recommendations for a patient with a past EBV infection?
How do you interpret an Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) antigen and antibody lab panel?
What is the best serological marker for past Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection?
What is the difference between EBV (Epstein-Barr Virus) nuc (nuclear) IgG (Immunoglobulin G) serology tests, specifically EIA (Enzyme Immunoassay) and EN (alternative method), for diagnosing past EBV infection?
How to interpret Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) blood test results?
How to induce diuresis in a patient with impaired renal function?
What is the diagnosis for a 39-year-old primigravida (first pregnancy) at 38 weeks gestation with a history of hypertension treated with nifedipine (calcium channel blocker) and asthma treated with albuterol (beta-2 adrenergic receptor agonist), who develops postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) with a soft uterus after a forceps-assisted vaginal delivery and manual placental extraction?
What is the initial workup for a suspicious, non-tender (not tender to the touch) mass in the inguinal (groin) region for potential malignancy (cancer)?
What is the concern for a 34-year-old gravida 3 para 0 aborta 2 woman at 18 weeks gestation with a low-lying placenta and myometrial thinning, but otherwise normal prenatal findings and no chronic medical conditions, taking a daily prenatal vitamin?
What is the interpretation of dexamethasone (corticosteroid) suppression test results showing normal morning cortisol levels, low Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) levels, and low Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels?
What is the onset of action of Fluticasone (Flonase)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.