Documentation of Intraoperative Findings for Huge Abdominopelvic Mass
When documenting intraoperative findings of a huge abdominopelvic mass occupying the whole abdomen, systematically describe: precise anatomic location and extent, dimensions in three planes (length × width × height), relationship to adjacent organs and structures, surface characteristics (smooth vs irregular, encapsulated vs infiltrative), consistency (solid, cystic, or mixed), vascularity, presence of ascites, peritoneal implants, and any organ involvement or displacement. 1
Essential Components of Intraoperative Documentation
Anatomic Location and Extent
- Document the precise origin of the mass (retroperitoneal, intraperitoneal, pelvic, or combined abdominopelvic) 1
- Specify which anatomic quadrants or regions are occupied (e.g., "mass extends from pelvis to xiphoid process, occupying entire peritoneal cavity") 1
- Note whether the mass is unilateral, bilateral, or midline 2
- Identify if retroperitoneal (as these can grow to massive sizes asymptomatically, averaging 20-25 cm diameter at diagnosis) 3
Precise Measurements
- Record dimensions in three planes using the longest and shortest diameters (length × width × height in centimeters) 1
- Document estimated weight if the mass is removed (giant masses can weigh 20-107 kg) 3, 4
- Measure from fixed anatomic landmarks (e.g., distance from pelvic brim, diaphragm, or specific organs) 1
Relationship to Adjacent Structures
- Systematically document involvement or displacement of each organ: stomach, small bowel, colon (specify segments), liver, spleen, kidneys, ureters, bladder, uterus/ovaries (if applicable), major vessels (aorta, IVC, iliac vessels) 1
- Describe whether organs are compressed, displaced, or invaded 1
- Note if the mass is adherent to or separate from adjacent structures 1
- Document any organ resection required (e.g., "right colon, right kidney and ureter resected en bloc with mass") 3
Surface and Margin Characteristics
- Describe the external surface: smooth vs irregular, lobulated vs uniform 1
- Note if margins are well-defined/encapsulated or infiltrative 1
- Document the presence or absence of a capsule 1
- Describe the serosal surface appearance if applicable 1
Mass Consistency and Composition
- Specify if solid, cystic, or mixed (heterogeneous) 1
- For cystic masses, describe fluid characteristics (clear, hemorrhagic, mucinous) and estimated volume 1
- For solid masses, note consistency (firm, soft, rubbery, hard/fixed) 1
- Document areas of necrosis, hemorrhage, or calcification if visible 1
Vascular Assessment
- Describe vascularity (hypervascular vs hypovascular) 1
- Note major feeding vessels if identifiable 1
- Document any vascular invasion or encasement 1
Peritoneal and Metastatic Assessment
- Document presence or absence of ascites (and estimate volume if present) 1
- Note peritoneal implants or nodules with locations and sizes 1
- Describe any lymphadenopathy with specific nodal stations and dimensions 1
- Document liver surface for metastases 5
Critical Safety Documentation
- Note any intraoperative complications (bowel perforation, vascular injury, hemorrhage) 1
- Document estimated blood loss 4
- Record any organs requiring resection for complete removal 3
- Note if complete resection was achieved or if residual disease remains 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Inadequate anatomic detail: Vague descriptions like "large mass" are insufficient; always provide three-dimensional measurements and specific organ relationships 1
Failure to document resection margins: For potentially malignant masses, clearly state whether margins appear grossly negative or if tumor extends to resection edges 1
Omitting functional anatomy: For pelvic masses, document relationship to ureters, bladder trigone, and rectum to guide postoperative management 1
Incomplete peritoneal survey: Even with a dominant mass, systematically examine all peritoneal surfaces, liver, and lymph node basins for metastatic disease 1, 5