Is it safe to perform an MRI with gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) in a patient with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) of 35?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

MRI with Gadolinium in CKD with eGFR 35

Yes, it is safe to perform an MRI with gadolinium-based contrast agents (specifically Group II macrocyclic agents) in a patient with CKD and eGFR 35 mL/min/1.73 m², and the risk of withholding necessary diagnostic imaging likely outweighs the extremely low risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). 1, 2

Understanding the Risk Profile

Your patient with eGFR 35 falls into CKD Stage 3b, which represents a moderate-to-severe reduction in kidney function but is above the critical threshold of eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² where heightened caution is required. 2, 3

  • The risk of NSF in patients with eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m² (CKD Stage 3) is very low, with only rare published reports of questionable validity. 3
  • The highest risk populations for NSF are those with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² (CKD Stage 4-5), acute kidney injury, or patients on dialysis—your patient does not fall into these categories. 2, 3

GBCA Classification: Critical for Safety

Not all gadolinium agents are created equal. The classification system is essential:

  • Group I GBCAs (linear agents): gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, gadoversetamide—these are associated with the highest NSF risk and nearly all unconfounded NSF cases. These remain absolutely contraindicated even in your patient. 2, 4, 5

  • Group II GBCAs (macrocyclic agents): gadobutrol, gadoterate meglumine, gadoteridol—these have an exceedingly low risk of NSF (much less than 1%) even in patients with severe renal impairment. 1, 2, 4

  • Group III GBCAs: gadoxetate disodium—likely very low risk but insufficient confirmatory evidence. 2

Specific Recommendations for Your Patient

Use a Group II macrocyclic GBCA (such as gadoteridol, gadobutrol, or gadoterate meglumine) as these are thermodynamically stable and kinetically inert, making them the safest choice. 6, 3

Dosing Protocol

  • Administer the standard diagnostic dose of 0.1 mmol/kg—do not use half or quarter dosing as this is not recommended and may compromise diagnostic quality. 3, 4, 5
  • Use the lowest effective dose necessary for adequate imaging. 2, 7
  • Avoid multiple closely spaced doses when possible; if subsequent imaging is needed and not urgent, delay >24 hours. 3

Pre-Procedure Considerations

  • Kidney function screening is optional for Group II GBCAs in patients with eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73 m². 3
  • However, since you already know the eGFR is 35, you have sufficient information to proceed safely. 1
  • No special dialysis arrangements are needed for your patient. 1

Evidence Quality and Guideline Consensus

The 2021 American College of Radiology and National Kidney Foundation consensus statements represent the most authoritative and current guidance on this topic. 1, 2, 6 This represents a paradigm shift from older 2014 guidelines that were more restrictive. 2

  • In a systematic review of 4,931 Group II GBCA administrations in patients with Stage 4 or 5 CKD (eGFR <30), the risk of NSF was 0%. 3
  • A retrospective analysis of 2,053 CKD patients receiving gadolinium-enhanced MRI (including 491 with Stage 4 CKD) identified zero cases of NSF during extended follow-up. 8

Risk-Benefit Analysis

The harm of delaying or withholding a clinically indicated MRI in your patient may outweigh the extremely low risk of NSF. 1, 2

  • Missing critical diagnostic information can lead to inappropriate treatment decisions, disease progression, and worse clinical outcomes. 2
  • The risk of NSF with Group II agents in your patient's eGFR range is negligible. 3, 8

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not automatically withhold contrast based solely on eGFR values—consider the clinical necessity of the diagnostic information. 6
  • Do not use Group I linear agents (gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, gadoversetamide) in any patient with kidney impairment. 2, 4, 5
  • Do not use reduced dosing (half or quarter doses) as this is not recommended and may compromise image quality without proven safety benefit. 4, 5
  • Do not initiate or alter dialysis schedules based on Group II GBCA administration—this is unnecessary and unproven to reduce NSF risk. 1, 4, 5

Gadolinium Retention Considerations

While gadolinium retention in tissues (brain, bone, skin) occurs with all GBCAs, retention is lowest with macrocyclic agents like those in Group II. 7

  • Clinical consequences of retention have not been established in patients with normal or near-normal renal function. 7
  • Pathologic consequences are primarily seen in patients with severely impaired renal function (eGFR <30), which does not apply to your patient. 7

Monitoring

  • Observe the patient for signs and symptoms of hypersensitivity reactions during and for up to 2 hours after administration. 7
  • Instruct the patient to report any delayed symptoms of NSF (skin thickening, joint stiffness, muscle weakness), though the risk is extremely low. 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in CKD Stage 3

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Kidney Disease: Comprehensive Review and Clinical Practice Guideline Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists.

Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes, 2018

Guideline

Contrast Administration in CKD Stage 4 Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.