Wait-and-See Approach in Atrial Fibrillation Rhythm Control
The RACE 7 ACWAS trial (2019) is the landmark study that specifically investigated and validated the wait-and-see approach for recent-onset atrial fibrillation, demonstrating that delaying cardioversion for up to 48 hours while using rate control is noninferior to immediate cardioversion. 1
The RACE 7 ACWAS Trial Design and Findings
The RACE 7 ACWAS (Acute Cardioversion versus Wait-And-See) trial was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial that enrolled patients presenting to emergency departments with hemodynamically stable, recent-onset (<36 hours), symptomatic atrial fibrillation. 1
Key trial methodology:
- Patients were randomized to either a wait-and-see approach (delayed cardioversion) or early cardioversion 1
- The wait-and-see strategy involved initial treatment with rate-control medication only, with delayed cardioversion performed only if atrial fibrillation did not resolve spontaneously within 48 hours 1
- Primary endpoint was presence of sinus rhythm at 4 weeks 1
Critical results demonstrating noninferiority:
- Sinus rhythm at 4 weeks occurred in 91% of delayed-cardioversion patients versus 94% in early-cardioversion patients (difference: -2.9 percentage points; 95% CI: -8.2 to 2.2; P = 0.005 for noninferiority) 1
- In the wait-and-see group, 69% of patients converted spontaneously to sinus rhythm within 48 hours without requiring any cardioversion 1
- Only 28% of wait-and-see patients ultimately required delayed cardioversion 1
- Recurrence rates were essentially identical: 30% in delayed-cardioversion group versus 29% in early-cardioversion group 1
- Cardiovascular complications were comparable between groups (10 patients versus 8 patients) 1
Guideline Integration of Wait-and-See Approach
The most recent 2024 ESC guidelines have incorporated this evidence into their recommendations. For patients with first-diagnosed symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation, a wait-and-see approach to allow spontaneous restoration of sinus rhythm within 48 hours receives a Class IIa recommendation. 2
The 2011 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines also acknowledged this strategy, noting that "in patients who tolerate AF relatively well, a wait-and-see approach using oral sotalol is an appropriate option" for rate control while awaiting spontaneous conversion. 2
Supporting Evidence from Earlier Studies
A 2011 prospective observational study published in Emergency Medicine International provided earlier supporting evidence for this approach, though with a smaller sample size. 3 In this study:
- 63% of patients had spontaneous resolution of atrial fibrillation when they returned the following day for potential cardioversion 3
- All remaining patients underwent successful cardioversion without significant adverse events 3
- No patients required hospitalization 3
- All patients reported being "very satisfied" with this approach 3
Clinical Application and Patient Selection
The wait-and-see approach is appropriate for:
- Hemodynamically stable patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation (<48 hours duration) 2, 1
- Patients without urgent indications for immediate cardioversion (no hypotension, acute heart failure, ongoing chest pain, or altered mental status) 4
- Symptomatic but tolerating the arrhythmia reasonably well 2
Critical exclusions where immediate cardioversion is required:
- Hemodynamic instability 4
- Acute heart failure or worsening heart failure 2
- Ongoing myocardial ischemia 4
- Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with rapid ventricular response 4
Practical Implementation
When employing the wait-and-see strategy:
- Initiate rate control medication (beta-blockers as first-line for most patients, or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers for those with preserved ejection fraction) 4
- Target lenient rate control initially (resting heart rate <110 bpm) 2
- Ensure appropriate anticoagulation based on CHA₂DS₂-VASc score and duration of atrial fibrillation 4
- Plan for reassessment within 48 hours of symptom onset 1
- Proceed with cardioversion if spontaneous conversion has not occurred by 48 hours 2, 1
The major clinical advantage is that nearly 70% of patients avoid unnecessary cardioversion procedures, procedural sedation, and the associated risks and costs, while achieving equivalent outcomes. 1