What trial discusses a wait and see approach in atrial fibrillation rhythm control strategy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Wait-and-See Approach in Atrial Fibrillation Rhythm Control

The RACE 7 ACWAS trial (2019) is the landmark study that specifically investigated and validated the wait-and-see approach for recent-onset atrial fibrillation, demonstrating that delaying cardioversion for up to 48 hours while using rate control is noninferior to immediate cardioversion. 1

The RACE 7 ACWAS Trial Design and Findings

The RACE 7 ACWAS (Acute Cardioversion versus Wait-And-See) trial was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial that enrolled patients presenting to emergency departments with hemodynamically stable, recent-onset (<36 hours), symptomatic atrial fibrillation. 1

Key trial methodology:

  • Patients were randomized to either a wait-and-see approach (delayed cardioversion) or early cardioversion 1
  • The wait-and-see strategy involved initial treatment with rate-control medication only, with delayed cardioversion performed only if atrial fibrillation did not resolve spontaneously within 48 hours 1
  • Primary endpoint was presence of sinus rhythm at 4 weeks 1

Critical results demonstrating noninferiority:

  • Sinus rhythm at 4 weeks occurred in 91% of delayed-cardioversion patients versus 94% in early-cardioversion patients (difference: -2.9 percentage points; 95% CI: -8.2 to 2.2; P = 0.005 for noninferiority) 1
  • In the wait-and-see group, 69% of patients converted spontaneously to sinus rhythm within 48 hours without requiring any cardioversion 1
  • Only 28% of wait-and-see patients ultimately required delayed cardioversion 1
  • Recurrence rates were essentially identical: 30% in delayed-cardioversion group versus 29% in early-cardioversion group 1
  • Cardiovascular complications were comparable between groups (10 patients versus 8 patients) 1

Guideline Integration of Wait-and-See Approach

The most recent 2024 ESC guidelines have incorporated this evidence into their recommendations. For patients with first-diagnosed symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation, a wait-and-see approach to allow spontaneous restoration of sinus rhythm within 48 hours receives a Class IIa recommendation. 2

The 2011 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines also acknowledged this strategy, noting that "in patients who tolerate AF relatively well, a wait-and-see approach using oral sotalol is an appropriate option" for rate control while awaiting spontaneous conversion. 2

Supporting Evidence from Earlier Studies

A 2011 prospective observational study published in Emergency Medicine International provided earlier supporting evidence for this approach, though with a smaller sample size. 3 In this study:

  • 63% of patients had spontaneous resolution of atrial fibrillation when they returned the following day for potential cardioversion 3
  • All remaining patients underwent successful cardioversion without significant adverse events 3
  • No patients required hospitalization 3
  • All patients reported being "very satisfied" with this approach 3

Clinical Application and Patient Selection

The wait-and-see approach is appropriate for:

  • Hemodynamically stable patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation (<48 hours duration) 2, 1
  • Patients without urgent indications for immediate cardioversion (no hypotension, acute heart failure, ongoing chest pain, or altered mental status) 4
  • Symptomatic but tolerating the arrhythmia reasonably well 2

Critical exclusions where immediate cardioversion is required:

  • Hemodynamic instability 4
  • Acute heart failure or worsening heart failure 2
  • Ongoing myocardial ischemia 4
  • Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with rapid ventricular response 4

Practical Implementation

When employing the wait-and-see strategy:

  • Initiate rate control medication (beta-blockers as first-line for most patients, or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers for those with preserved ejection fraction) 4
  • Target lenient rate control initially (resting heart rate <110 bpm) 2
  • Ensure appropriate anticoagulation based on CHA₂DS₂-VASc score and duration of atrial fibrillation 4
  • Plan for reassessment within 48 hours of symptom onset 1
  • Proceed with cardioversion if spontaneous conversion has not occurred by 48 hours 2, 1

The major clinical advantage is that nearly 70% of patients avoid unnecessary cardioversion procedures, procedural sedation, and the associated risks and costs, while achieving equivalent outcomes. 1

References

Research

Early or Delayed Cardioversion in Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation.

The New England journal of medicine, 2019

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Initial Management of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.