Should you chart negative human signs?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Should You Chart Negative Homan's Sign?

No, you should not routinely chart a negative Homan's sign, as it is neither sensitive nor specific for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and has been largely abandoned in modern clinical practice due to its poor diagnostic accuracy and potential to provide false reassurance.

Why Homan's Sign Should Not Be Documented

Poor Diagnostic Performance

  • Homan's sign (calf pain with dorsiflexion of the foot) has been demonstrated to have extremely poor sensitivity (10-54%) and specificity (39-89%) for detecting DVT, making it clinically unreliable for ruling in or ruling out disease 1
  • The presence or absence of individual clinical signs and symptoms, including Homan's sign, are not accurate enough to rule in or rule out thrombotic disease 1

Risk of False Reassurance

  • Documenting a negative Homan's sign may create false reassurance and delay appropriate diagnostic testing (such as D-dimer or ultrasound) in patients with actual DVT 1
  • Clinical assessment should focus on validated risk stratification tools (such as Wells' criteria) rather than unreliable physical examination findings 1

What Should Be Documented Instead

Appropriate Clinical Documentation

  • Document objective vital signs and validated assessment tools rather than outdated physical examination maneuvers 2
  • Record relevant clinical findings that contribute to validated prediction rules: unilateral leg swelling, localized tenderness along deep venous system, entire leg swelling, collateral superficial veins, previous documented DVT 1
  • Use standardized assessment scales and physiological track-and-trigger systems (such as NEWS) for monitoring acutely unwell patients 2

Time-Based Documentation Standards

  • All clinical documentation should include time-based records with specific measurements rather than subjective or unreliable signs 2
  • Focus on documenting findings that have established diagnostic value and contribute to evidence-based clinical decision-making 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Documentation Errors

  • Avoid documenting physical examination findings that lack established validity or reliability, as this clutters the medical record without adding clinical value 2
  • Do not rely on negative findings of unreliable tests to exclude serious diagnoses—this represents a significant patient safety risk 1

Clinical Decision-Making

  • Never use the absence of Homan's sign to rule out DVT or to avoid ordering appropriate diagnostic testing when clinical suspicion exists 1
  • Recognize that measurement error exists even with validated scales (inter-rater reliability typically 0.85-0.9), making unreliable signs even more problematic 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.