What is the most appropriate way to assess a patient with diabetes presenting with toe swelling, discharge, and a 2 cm ulcer on the first metatarsal?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Assessment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer with Suspected Osteomyelitis

MRI is the most appropriate imaging modality to assess this patient with a diabetic foot ulcer, swelling, and discharge over the first metatarsal. 1, 2, 3

Initial Clinical Assessment

Begin with plain radiographs in three views with a radio-opaque marker at the ulcer site as the mandatory first imaging study for all non-superficial diabetic foot infections. 3 However, recognize that plain films have poor sensitivity (61.9%) and may not show osteomyelitis changes for 2-3 weeks, so normal early radiographs do not exclude bone infection. 3

  • Perform a probe-to-bone test during wound examination, as a positive result is largely diagnostic of osteomyelitis. 3
  • Check inflammatory markers (ESR and CRP), as markedly elevated values suggest osteomyelitis. 3
  • The combination of positive probe-to-bone test, elevated ESR, and positive X-rays makes osteomyelitis highly probable, but if probe-to-bone is the only positive test, advanced imaging with MRI should be performed, especially in high-risk patients. 1

Why MRI is the Optimal Choice

MRI with fluid-sensitive, fat-suppressed sequences is the modality of choice for investigating soft-tissue complications in diabetic foot infections. 1, 2 The evidence supporting MRI is compelling:

  • MRI has the highest diagnostic accuracy for osteomyelitis with 93-96.4% sensitivity and 75-83.8% specificity, significantly outperforming plain radiographs (60% sensitivity, 81% specificity), technetium bone scans (100% sensitivity, 25% specificity), and indium-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy (80% sensitivity, 29% specificity). 3, 4, 5
  • MRI provides superior soft tissue contrast compared to X-rays or CT, allowing identification of skin ulcers, sinus tracts, abscesses, tenosynovitis, and differentiation between cellulitis (which enhances with IV contrast) and simple edema (no enhancement). 1, 2
  • The first metatarsal area is a high-risk location for osteomyelitis, as pedal osteomyelitis occurs most frequently around the fifth and first metatarsophalangeal joints from contiguous spread of soft tissue infection. 1
  • Forefoot infections can spread into adjacent compartments, making extent assessment critical for surgical planning, which MRI accomplishes better than other modalities. 1, 2

Why the Other Options Are Inappropriate

Duplex ultrasound (Option A), conventional angiography (Option B), and MRA (Option C) are for evaluating arterial perfusion, not infection. 3 These vascular imaging studies would only be indicated if:

  • Distal pulses were absent
  • Ankle-brachial index <0.9
  • Toe-brachial index <0.75

Since this patient has intact distal pulses, vascular imaging is not indicated. 3

CT with contrast (Option D) is not recommended as a primary imaging modality for diabetic foot osteomyelitis. 3 While CT may guide interventions for ulcer prevention and can detect soft tissue emphysema, it has lower tissue contrast ratio than MRI for soft tissue complications. 1

Clinical Algorithm

Follow this stepwise approach:

  1. Obtain plain radiographs immediately as the initial screening study. 3
  2. Perform MRI of the foot to definitively assess for osteomyelitis and soft tissue infection extent. 2, 3
  3. If MRI shows osteomyelitis, treat for bone infection with prolonged antibiotics (typically 6 weeks). 1, 2
  4. If MRI shows only soft tissue infection, withhold prolonged antibiotic therapy for osteomyelitis but treat the soft tissue infection appropriately. 2
  5. If MRI is unavailable, contraindicated, or shows equivocal results, consider WBC SPECT/CT or [18F]FDG PET/CT as alternative advanced imaging. 1, 2, 3

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not delay antibiotic therapy to obtain imaging - start empirical IV antibiotics immediately after obtaining wound cultures in moderate diabetic foot infections. 3
  • Do not obtain superficial wound swabs - deep tissue specimens or bone cultures obtained aseptically provide reliable microbiological data. 3
  • Do not order vascular imaging based solely on diabetes - clinical assessment of pulses and perfusion guides the need for vascular studies. 3
  • MRI should be performed before nuclear medicine imaging since it is widely available, radiation-free, and provides the most comprehensive assessment. 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diabetic Foot Infection Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Initial Assessment and Management of Diabetic Foot Infection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.