What is the treatment for interstitial lung disease (ILD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment for Interstitial Lung Disease

For systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated ILD (SARD-ILD), mycophenolate is the preferred first-line immunosuppressive therapy, while for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), antifibrotic therapy with nintedanib or pirfenidone should be initiated to slow disease progression. 1, 2, 3

Disease-Specific Treatment Algorithms

Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease-Associated ILD (SARD-ILD)

Preferred first-line agents:

  • Mycophenolate is the preferred immunosuppressive agent due to favorable efficacy and tolerability across all SARD-ILD subtypes 1, 2, 4
  • Short-term glucocorticoids (oral prednisone or IV pulse methylprednisolone for acute/severe presentations) may be added as adjunctive therapy, though not required in all patients 1, 2
  • Alternative immunosuppressive options include rituximab, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide, selected based on extrapulmonary manifestations 1, 2

Disease-specific modifications:

  • For SSc-ILD: Tocilizumab is conditionally recommended as first-line option; nintedanib is also conditionally recommended 1, 2. Glucocorticoids are strongly contraindicated due to association with scleroderma renal crisis 1, 2
  • For RA-ILD: Mycophenolate, rituximab, and tocilizumab are preferred; nintedanib remains controversial without panel consensus 1, 4
  • For IIM-ILD: JAK inhibitors and calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus) are conditionally recommended as first-line options in addition to mycophenolate and rituximab 1, 2, 4
  • For MCTD-ILD: Tocilizumab is conditionally recommended 1, 2

Agents to avoid:

  • Methotrexate, leflunomide, TNF inhibitors, and abatacept are strongly recommended against for any SARD-ILD as they may worsen lung disease 1, 2, 4
  • Pirfenidone is conditionally recommended against for SARD-ILD 1, 2, 4
  • Upfront combination of antifibrotics (nintedanib or pirfenidone) with mycophenolate is not recommended without evidence of progression 1, 2

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)

Antifibrotic therapy is the cornerstone:

  • Nintedanib or pirfenidone should be prescribed according to ATS/ERS guidelines to slow FVC decline by approximately 44-57% annually 1, 3
  • These agents reduce mean FVC decline (pirfenidone showed 193 mL treatment difference vs placebo at 52 weeks) 5
  • Antifibrotic therapy should be prescribed based on disease progression criteria, not specifically for cough 1

Corticosteroids have no role in stable IPF:

  • No controlled studies support corticosteroid use for IPF-associated symptoms 1
  • "Triple therapy" (corticosteroids + azathioprine + N-acetyl-cysteine) is associated with increased mortality compared to placebo 1
  • Corticosteroids should be limited to suspected IPF exacerbation or co-existing asthma/eosinophilic bronchitis 1

Rapidly Progressive ILD (RP-ILD)

Upfront combination therapy is mandatory:

  • Triple therapy is required for MDA-5 positive or suspected RP-ILD: IV pulse methylprednisolone + cyclophosphamide + tacrolimus demonstrates survival benefit over sequential approaches 2, 4
  • Double or triple therapy for non-MDA-5 RP-ILD: Combine 2-3 agents from: rituximab, cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, IVIG, mycophenolate, or JAK inhibitors 2, 4
  • Early lung transplant referral is essential, particularly when high-flow oxygen is required, rather than waiting for further progression 2

Management of Progressive Disease Despite First-Line Treatment

When ILD progresses on initial therapy:

  • Switch to an alternative immunosuppressive agent OR add a second agent 4
  • For SSc-ILD progression: Consider adding nintedanib to ongoing immunosuppression 1
  • For RA-ILD progression: Nintedanib was proven to slow disease progression and is conditionally recommended 1
  • Options for progressive disease include: nintedanib, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and JAK inhibitors 4

Cough Management in ILD

Algorithmic approach to troublesome cough:

  • First, determine if ILD is the cause: look for disease progression, temporal association between cough onset and disease progression, and favorable response to ILD therapy 1
  • If cough persists despite ILD treatment, evaluate for: asthma, nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis, upper airway cough syndrome, and GERD 1
  • Consider esophageal dysmotility/GERD particularly in systemic sclerosis context 1
  • If no cause identified and patient significantly troubled, follow unexplained chronic cough guideline approach as some ILD patients have dysfunctional cough sensory nerves (cough hypersensitivity syndrome) 1

Specific cough therapies:

  • Thalidomide showed quality of life improvement in small IPF-associated cough trial but had significant side effects; not recommended for routine use but warrants further study 1
  • Inhaled cromolyn sodium (PA101) showed promise with >30% reduction in objective cough frequency in pilot study 1

Monitoring Requirements

Pulmonary function testing schedule:

  • Every 3-6 months for first 1-2 years in mild CTD-ILD (FVC ≥70%, <20% fibrosis on HRCT) 1
  • Every 3-6 months for moderate-to-severe ILD or progressive disease 1, 2
  • A 5% decline in FVC over 12 months is associated with approximately 2-fold increase in mortality 3

Imaging surveillance:

  • Baseline HRCT (approximately 91% sensitive, 71% specific for ILD subtypes) 3
  • Repeat HRCT within 3-6 months to 1 year depending on underlying disease, ILD pattern, and extent 1
  • Repeat within first 3 years after diagnosis to identify progressive disease 1

Laboratory monitoring:

  • Complete blood count with differential every 2-4 months for patients on mycophenolate 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Glucocorticoid-related complications:

  • Long-term glucocorticoid use should be reserved for short-term bridging only 2
  • Never use glucocorticoids as first-line therapy in SSc-ILD due to renal crisis risk 1, 2
  • Avoid "triple therapy" in IPF given mortality data 1

Management structure:

  • Co-management by rheumatology and pulmonology is essential for optimal SARD-ILD outcomes 2, 4
  • Shared decision-making must consider disease severity, risk factors, and potential toxicities 4

Treatment selection errors:

  • Never use methotrexate, leflunomide, TNF inhibitors, or abatacept in any SARD-ILD 1, 2
  • Do not add antifibrotics to mycophenolate upfront without evidence of progression 1, 2
  • Recognize that UIP pattern in CTD-ILD has better survival than idiopathic UIP, but still requires aggressive treatment 6

Supportive Care and Advanced Therapies

Symptomatic management:

  • Structured exercise therapy reduces symptoms and improves 6-minute walk test distance in dyspneic patients 3
  • Oxygen therapy reduces symptoms and improves quality of life in patients who desaturate below 88% on 6-minute walk test 3
  • For pulmonary hypertension (develops in up to 85% of end-stage fibrotic ILD), inhaled treprostinil improves walking distance and respiratory symptoms 3

Lung transplantation:

  • Consider for advanced ILD with median survival of 5.2-6.7 years post-transplant compared to <2 years without transplant in advanced disease 3
  • Optimal medical management is preferred over transplant referral as first-line approach, but early referral is essential for RP-ILD 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Initial Treatment Approach for Interstitial Lung Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment Protocol for Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.