What causes false elevations in plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 217 levels?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

False Elevations in Plasma P-tau 217

False elevations in plasma p-tau 217 are primarily caused by pre-analytical errors, assay-related factors, and biological confounders rather than true disease processes, with the most critical issues being improper blood collection/handling, use of low-performing assays, and comorbid cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease.

Pre-analytical Sources of False Elevation

Blood Collection and Processing Errors

  • Systematic errors can occur from differences in blood collection timing (morning versus evening samples), which may artificially alter p-tau217 measurements 1

  • Using lithium heparin plasma instead of EDTA plasma can introduce systematic measurement differences that falsely elevate or alter p-tau217 values 1

  • Blood draw devices and processing parameters during collection can interfere with AD biomarker measurements and should be carefully standardized 1

  • Improper centrifugation or failure to remove particulates before analysis can affect measurement accuracy 1

  • Delayed processing or improper storage of samples may impact results, though p-tau217 is relatively robust to pre-analytical delays compared to other biomarkers 2

Analytical Sources of False Elevation

Assay Performance Issues

  • Not all p-tau assays perform equally, and lower-performing assays can produce misleading results that appear falsely elevated 3, 1

  • Random error from assay variability can result in false classification, especially for individuals with biomarker values close to diagnostic cut-offs 1

  • Systematic error related to changing assay conditions (new lot of antibodies or calibrators) can shift measurements and create false elevations 1

  • Lack of proper calibration curves, quality control performance, or plate adjustments using bridging samples can introduce measurement drift over time 1

  • Different assays return vastly different numerical values for the same analyte due to different calibrators and technical platforms, which can be misinterpreted as elevated when comparing across platforms 1

Biological Confounders

Medical Comorbidities

  • Cerebrovascular disease and cardiovascular disease are the most important biological confounders that may influence p-tau217 measurements and require careful interpretation 1, 3, 2

  • Age, creatinine levels, and depressive symptoms are biological confounders that can affect p-tau217 measurements 3, 2

  • Renal dysfunction (reflected by elevated creatinine) may alter clearance or metabolism of tau proteins, potentially affecting plasma levels 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Clinical Context Matters

  • In real-world clinical settings with heterogeneous populations, performance may not match research cohorts where high accuracies were recorded, as community prevalence of AD pathology is much lower 1

  • False positives are more likely when testing unselected populations versus highly selected research cohorts that had prior CSF or neuroimaging confirmation 1

  • Cognitively intact older adults can have elevated Aβ levels (and potentially p-tau), but not all will progress to dementia due to resilience factors 1

Assay Selection is Critical

  • High-performing platforms must be used to ensure accurate results, including Quanterix Simoa, Lumipulse G (FDA-approved for p-tau181), IP-MS methods, and emerging NULISA technology 2

  • Head-to-head comparisons show commonly used assays with lower performance compared to validated platforms 1

  • A two-cutpoint approach may be necessary to minimize false positives, with some results falling into an indeterminate zone requiring confirmatory testing 4

Quality Control Measures

Laboratory Standards

  • Assay performance metrics must be disclosed, including calibration curve R-values, linearity range, limit of detection, repeatability, and intermediate precision 1

  • Bridging samples or quality control samples should be used to account for batch variation when samples are analyzed continuously rather than in single batches 1

  • Certified reference materials should be employed to mitigate between-assay bias and improve comparability across platforms 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Biomarker Testing for Alzheimer's Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

P-tau 217 Specificity to Alzheimer's Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Optimizing cutpoints for clinical interpretation of brain amyloid status using plasma p-tau217 immunoassays.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2024

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.