What is the prevalence of SMAD4 (Smad family member 4) mutations?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prevalence of SMAD4 Mutations

Overall Prevalence in Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome

SMAD4 mutations account for approximately 20% of all juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) cases, with the overall prevalence of SMAD4 and BMPR1A mutations combined reaching 45% when both point mutations and large deletions are screened. 1

  • In the largest series to date of 102 JPS probands, 20 patients (19.6%) had SMAD4 point mutations and 2 additional patients had large SMAD4 deletions, bringing the total SMAD4 mutation prevalence to approximately 21.6% 1
  • When combining SMAD4 and BMPR1A mutations together, the overall genetic detection rate in JPS is 45%, with SMAD4 representing roughly half of identified mutations 1
  • An earlier study of 54 JPS probands found 9 patients (16.7%) with germline SMAD4 mutations 2

SMAD4 Mutations in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia

SMAD4 mutations cause the juvenile polyposis-HHT overlap syndrome, occurring in 1-2% of all HHT cases, with up to 76% of patients with JPS due to SMAD4 developing features of HHT. 3, 4

  • The coexistence of JPS and HHT is exclusively due to SMAD4 mutations, not BMPR1A mutations 4
  • Among patients with JPS who carry SMAD4 mutations, 76% manifest clinical features of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia 4

SMAD4 Mutations in Sporadic Colorectal Cancer

SMAD4 mutations in sporadic colorectal cancer show stage-dependent prevalence, with 0% in adenomas, 7-10% in early invasive carcinomas, and 31-35% in metastatic disease. 5

  • In a series of 176 colorectal tumors, SMAD4 mutations were found in: 0/40 (0%) adenomas, 4/39 (10%) intramucosal carcinomas, 3/44 (7%) primary invasive carcinomas without metastasis, 6/17 (35%) primary invasive carcinomas with distant metastasis, and 11/36 (31%) distant metastases 5
  • The difference between metastatic and non-metastatic carcinomas was statistically significant (p=0.006-0.01) 5
  • Loss of the other allele occurred in 19 of 20 (95%) invasive and metastasized carcinomas with SMAD4 mutations 5

Detection Methods and Large Deletions

Large deletions of SMAD4 are less frequent than point mutations but represent important heritable causes of JPS that require multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) screening in addition to sequencing. 1

  • Point mutations detected by sequencing account for the majority of SMAD4 mutations (20/102 probands), while large deletions detected by MLPA add approximately 2% to the detection rate 1
  • SMAD4 mutations in JPS-associated polyps show low sensitivity (10% of informative cases) but high specificity for familial juvenile polyposis syndrome 6

Clinical Significance of Mutation Status

Patients with germline SMAD4 mutations have a more prominent JPS phenotype with significantly higher risk of upper gastrointestinal involvement and gastric cancer compared to BMPR1A mutation carriers. 4, 2

  • SMAD4 mutation carriers show 73% gastric polyposis prevalence versus 8% in BMPR1A carriers (p<0.001) 4
  • All cases of gastric cancer in one cohort occurred exclusively in patients with SMAD4 pathogenic variants 4
  • SMAD4 mutations predispose specifically to upper gastrointestinal polyposis with higher family history of UGI involvement (p<0.01) compared to BMPR1A mutations 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.