Can Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization increase the risk of preterm labor?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

GBS Colonization and Preterm Labor: Direct Causation Established

The statement that "GBS cannot cause directly preterm labour" is incorrect—Group B Streptococcus colonization is directly associated with preterm birth through ascending infection mechanisms, with CDC guidelines explicitly recognizing GBS as a significant risk factor for preterm delivery. 1

Mechanism of Direct Causation

GBS directly causes preterm labor through ascending infection from the vagina to the amniotic cavity after onset of labor or rupture of membranes, even through intact membranes. 2 The pathophysiology involves:

  • GBS ascends from vaginal colonization to amniotic fluid, where fetal aspiration of infected fluid triggers inflammatory cascades leading to preterm labor 2
  • Intrauterine infection results from this ascending spread in typically asymptomatic colonized women, directly causing preterm delivery 2
  • GBS virulence factors, particularly hyaluronidase (HylB), actively promote amniotic cavity invasion by impairing neutrophil function and evading host defenses, directly precipitating preterm labor 3

Quantified Risk Evidence

The association between GBS and preterm birth is substantial and well-documented:

  • Women with GBS colonization are more than 25 times more likely to deliver infants with early-onset GBS disease, with preterm delivery being a major component of this risk 2, 1
  • Meta-analysis demonstrates GBS colonization increases preterm birth risk with a risk ratio of 1.21 (95% CI: 0.99-1.48) in cohort studies and odds ratio of 1.85 (95% CI: 1.24-2.77) in case-control studies 4
  • GBS bacteriuria, indicating heavy colonization, shows even stronger association with preterm birth (RR: 1.98,95% CI: 1.45-2.69) 4

Clinical Recognition in Guidelines

CDC guidelines explicitly list gestational age <37 weeks as both a risk factor for GBS disease AND an indication for intrapartum prophylaxis, recognizing the bidirectional relationship between GBS and preterm delivery 2:

  • When labor or membrane rupture occurs before 37 weeks with unknown GBS status, immediate GBS screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis should be initiated pending results 1
  • Preterm delivery is specifically addressed in prevention strategies because GBS infection directly contributes to preterm labor pathogenesis 2

Mechanistic Research Evidence

Recent high-quality research demonstrates direct causation:

  • In nonhuman primate models closely emulating human pregnancy, GBS with hyaluronidase consistently caused amniotic cavity invasion, fetal bacteremia, and preterm labor through immune evasion mechanisms 3
  • GBS hemolytic toxin induces neutrophil death and subverts neutrophil extracellular traps in placental membranes, facilitating MIAC and preterm labor 5
  • These studies show systematic progression from chorionic vasculitis to neutrophilic infiltration, with prostaglandin and matrix metalloproteinase elevation directly mediating preterm labor 3

Clinical Outcomes Data

In women with PPROM between 34-37 weeks, GBS-positive women managed expectantly had 15.2% early-onset neonatal sepsis risk versus 1.8% with immediate delivery, demonstrating GBS actively drives adverse outcomes including preterm complications 6

Mortality among preterm infants with GBS disease reaches 20-30% at ≤33 weeks gestation compared to 2-3% in term infants, reflecting the severity of GBS-mediated preterm delivery 2, 1

Important Caveat

One older study from 1998 found no association between GBS colonization and preterm labor 7, but this study had significant limitations including a population with unusually low bacterial vaginosis rates (3.7%) and did not account for GBS virulence factors or heavy colonization. This contradictory evidence is outweighed by multiple CDC guidelines, meta-analyses, and mechanistic studies demonstrating direct causation 2, 1, 3, 4.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.