Best Suture for Facial Wounds
For facial wound closure, use monofilament absorbable sutures (5-0 poliglecaprone-25 or 5-0 rapidly absorbing polyglactin 910) with a continuous non-locking subcuticular technique, as they provide equivalent cosmetic outcomes to non-absorbable sutures while eliminating the need for suture removal. 1, 2, 3
Optimal Suture Material Selection
Monofilament Absorbable Sutures Are Preferred
- Monofilament sutures cause less bacterial seeding and reduce infection risk compared to multifilament options, making them the material of choice for facial wounds 1, 4
- 5-0 poliglecaprone-25 (Monocryl) provides cosmetic results equivalent to 6-0 polypropylene (non-absorbable) in facial closures, with no statistically significant difference at 4-month follow-up (85% showed no difference between materials) 3
- 5-0 rapidly absorbing polyglactin 910 (Vicryl Rapide) demonstrates equivalent photographic scar appearance compared to 5-0 nylon at 6 months post-surgery, with no significant difference in visual analog scale scores (83.1 vs 83.0, P=0.72) 5
Specific Material Recommendations
- Use 5-0 poliglecaprone-25 (Monocryl) or 5-0 rapidly absorbing polyglactin 910 (Vicryl Rapide) for epidermal closure 1, 2, 3
- These absorbable options eliminate suture removal, saving time and reducing patient anxiety and discomfort 1, 2
- For deep dermal layers, use 4-0 poliglecaprone-25 to provide structural support 2
Materials to Avoid
- Never use catgut sutures for facial wounds, as they are associated with more pain and higher risk of requiring resuturing 1, 6
- Multifilament sutures should be avoided due to increased bacterial seeding risk 1
Suturing Technique
Continuous Non-Locking Subcuticular Closure
- Use continuous non-locking subcuticular technique for the final epidermal layer to minimize scarring and distribute tension evenly 1, 6, 4
- This technique avoids damage to superficial nerve endings, reducing postoperative pain 4
- Never use locking sutures, as they cause excessive tension leading to tissue edema and necrosis 6, 4
Suture Placement Specifications
- Place sutures approximately 5mm from the wound edge and between stitches to ensure adequate tension distribution without tissue strangulation 7, 6
- Use 4-0 or 5-0 suture size for optimal wound closure in facial lacerations 1, 6
- Avoid overly tight sutures that can strangulate tissue and impair healing 4
Antimicrobial-Coated Sutures
Consider Triclosan-Coated Options When Available
- Triclosan-coated sutures (such as Vicryl Plus) significantly reduce surgical site infection rates compared to non-coated sutures (OR 0.72,95% CI 0.59-0.88, P=0.001) 7
- Use antimicrobial-coated sutures for facial wounds in clean-contaminated or contaminated fields when available 7, 4
- The infection reduction benefit is consistent across different wound types and surgical procedures 7
Clinical Outcomes and Evidence Quality
Equivalent Cosmetic Results
- High-quality randomized trials demonstrate no difference in long-term cosmetic outcomes between absorbable and non-absorbable sutures for facial wounds 2, 3, 5
- No wound infections or premature suture rupture occurred in comparative studies of facial closures 2
- Patient satisfaction and observer assessments show comparable results between material types 5
Practical Advantages of Absorbable Sutures
- Elimination of suture removal saves surgeon time and decreases patient anxiety 1, 2
- Cost-effective when using remaining absorbable suture from deep layer closure 3
- Minimal pain during natural absorption process compared to removal procedures 8
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assume non-absorbable sutures provide superior cosmetic outcomes—evidence shows equivalence with properly selected absorbable materials 2, 3, 5
- Avoid using adhesive steri-strips routinely, as they provide no additional benefit in cosmetic outcomes or scar width reduction 7
- Do not use tissue adhesives alone for facial wounds, as sutures are significantly better at minimizing wound dehiscence (RR 3.35,95% CI 1.53-7.33) 7