From the Guidelines
The term for a second informed consent consultation with a doctor before surgery due to new information is "re-consent" or "renewed consent." This process is crucial in ensuring that patients are fully informed and able to make decisions based on the most current information available. According to the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland 1, patients should be provided with information before admission, and the anaesthetist must ensure that the patient understands this information. If new information becomes available, it is essential to discuss this with the patient and obtain their re-consent before proceeding with surgery. Key aspects of re-consent include:
- Discussing substantial modifications to the surgical plan
- Informing patients about newly discovered risks
- Presenting alternative treatment options that have emerged
- Addressing changes in the patient's condition that might affect surgical outcomes The importance of re-consent is highlighted by the need for patients to have sufficient time to come to a considered view after being provided with relevant information, as emphasized in the study by the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland 1. Re-consent is not just a legal requirement but an ethical obligation that respects patient autonomy and maintains trust in the doctor-patient relationship, as also noted in principles related to the ethical conduct of clinical research 1.
From the Research
Informed Consent Consultation
There are no research papers to assist in answering this question about the term for a second informed consent consultation with a doctor before surgery due to new information.
- The provided studies do not address the concept of informed consent or second consultations before surgery.
- Studies 2, 3, 4, 5 cover various topics such as sepsis, the effects of breaking up prolonged sitting, maternal metabolomics, and hair growth promotion by ginseng radix, but none relate to informed consent in a surgical context.