What are the considerations for removing the black box warning for estrogen (estrogen therapy)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Black Box Warning for Estrogen Therapy: Current Status and Considerations

The black box warning for estrogen therapy should remain in place, as the FDA-mandated warning is justified by consistent evidence of serious cardiovascular, thromboembolic, and oncologic risks that persist across multiple large-scale trials. 1

Current FDA Black Box Warning Requirements

The FDA black box warning mandates that estrogen therapy (with or without progestin) carries the following critical warnings 1:

  • Increased risk of endometrial cancer in women with an intact uterus using unopposed estrogen 1
  • Cardiovascular risks including myocardial infarction, stroke, venous thromboembolism, and pulmonary embolism 1
  • Increased risk of probable dementia in women ≥65 years (from WHIMS substudy) 1
  • Requirement for lowest effective dose and shortest duration consistent with treatment goals 1

Evidence Supporting Continuation of Black Box Warning

Combined Estrogen-Progestin Therapy

The USPSTF concludes with high certainty that chronic disease prevention benefits do not outweigh harms in most postmenopausal women 2:

  • Stroke risk increased by 21% (29 vs 21 per 10,000 women-years) 1
  • Coronary heart disease events increased (37 vs 30 per 10,000 women-years) 1
  • Invasive breast cancer risk elevated with small increase in breast cancer deaths 2
  • Venous thromboembolism risk doubled (RR 2.11; 95% CI 1.26-3.55) 2
  • Dementia risk increased in women ≥65 years 2
  • Gallbladder disease risk increased (RR 1.48; 95% CI 1.12-1.95) 2

Estrogen-Only Therapy

The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that benefits are unlikely to outweigh harms in most postmenopausal women who have had hysterectomy 2:

  • Stroke risk increased (thromboembolic stroke RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.01-1.40) 2
  • Venous thromboembolism risk increased (RR 2.14; 95% CI 1.64-2.81), highest in first year of use (RR 3.49) 2
  • Gallbladder disease risk elevated 2
  • Urinary incontinence increased in previously asymptomatic women 2
  • While breast cancer risk may be reduced, this does not offset cardiovascular and thromboembolic harms 2

Specific High-Risk Populations

Estrogen therapy is contraindicated (Class III recommendation) in women with 2, 3:

  • History of stroke or transient ischemic attack 2
  • History of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism 2
  • History of hormone-dependent cancers 3
  • Active or recent coronary heart disease 3
  • Active liver disease 3

Why the Warning Cannot Be Removed

Consistent Harm Across Multiple Trials

The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial—the largest randomized controlled trial of hormone therapy—demonstrated clear increases in serious adverse events that were not offset by benefits when used for chronic disease prevention 2, 1. These findings have been replicated in secondary prevention trials (HERS) showing no cardiovascular benefit and potential harm 1.

FDA-Approved Indications Are Limited

Current FDA-approved indications for estrogen therapy are restricted to 2, 1:

  • Treatment of moderate to severe menopausal vasomotor symptoms
  • Prevention of osteoporosis (when non-estrogen medications are not appropriate)

Notably, estrogen therapy is NOT approved for cardiovascular disease prevention 2, 4.

Professional Society Consensus

Multiple major medical organizations recommend against using hormone therapy for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease 3, 4:

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 4
  • North American Menopause Society 3
  • American Heart Association 3
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network 3

The "Timing Hypothesis" Remains Unproven

While some observational data and post-hoc analyses suggest potential cardiovascular benefit when estrogen is initiated close to menopause onset, no randomized trials have prospectively evaluated this hypothesis 2. The WHI showed elevated stroke risk regardless of years since menopause when therapy was started 2. Until prospective randomized trials confirm benefit in younger postmenopausal women, the precautionary principle supports maintaining current warnings 4.

Clinical Implications of Maintaining the Warning

Appropriate Use of Estrogen Therapy

When estrogen therapy is prescribed for FDA-approved indications (menopausal symptoms), the black box warning ensures 1:

  • Lowest effective dose is used
  • Shortest duration consistent with treatment goals
  • Regular reassessment at 3-6 month intervals 1
  • Adequate diagnostic measures for abnormal vaginal bleeding 1
  • Progestin co-administration in women with intact uterus 1

Risk-Benefit Assessment Framework

The warning mandates consideration of individual risk factors 2:

  • Age at initiation
  • Time since menopause
  • Personal history of cardiovascular disease, thromboembolism, or cancer
  • Family history of breast cancer or cardiovascular disease
  • Presence of other risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, obesity, smoking) 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not prescribe estrogen therapy for chronic disease prevention rather than symptom management 3
  • Do not assume "bioidentical" hormones are safer—all estrogen-based therapies carry similar WHI-demonstrated risks 3
  • Do not fail to discuss both benefits and risks with patients 3
  • Do not continue therapy indefinitely without periodic reassessment 1
  • Do not ignore contraindications in high-risk populations 2, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Bioidentical Hormone Replacement Therapy Considerations

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.