What are the indications and contraindications for using Jackson-Pratt (JP) drains versus Penrose drains?

Jackson-Pratt vs Penrose Drain: Indications and Contraindications

Direct Answer

Routine prophylactic use of both JP and Penrose drains should be avoided in most surgical settings, as they do not reduce mortality, morbidity, or infections and may increase surgical site infections and delay hospital discharge. 1, 2

---

Understanding Drain Types

Jackson-Pratt (JP) Drains

• Mechanism: Closed suction system using a collapsible bulb that generates negative pressure (87.4 cm H₂O with side-in evacuation vs 17.7 cm H₂O with bottom-up evacuation) 3
• Characteristics: Active drainage with controlled suction, silicone tubing with fenestrations, requires periodic bulb evacuation 1, 3
• Pressure loss: Suction decreases significantly as fluid accumulates (drops to 35.6 cm H₂O at 100 mL) 3

Penrose Drains

• Mechanism: Passive gravity-dependent drainage using soft rubber tubing 1
• Characteristics: Open system without suction capability, relies on capillary action and gravity 1
• Drainage: Less controlled, requires external dressing changes 1

---

Evidence-Based Contraindications (When NOT to Use Either Drain)

Absolute Contraindications for Routine Use

Emergency Laparotomy Settings:

• Routine drainage after emergency laparotomy shows no benefit for mortality, morbidity, infections, anastomotic leaks, or re-interventions 1, 2
• Closed suction drains (JP type) are associated with increased surgical site infections in trauma patients with hollow visceral injuries 1, 2
• No benefit in earlier detection of fluid collections 1, 2

Specific Surgical Procedures:

• Appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: Explicitly discouraged by World Society of Emergency Surgery; provides no benefit in preventing intra-abdominal abscess formation and leads to longer hospitalization 1, 2
• Perforated peptic ulcer repair: Omental patch closure is safe without prophylactic drainage; high rate of drain-related morbidity (fever, wound infections, peritoneal fluid accumulation, wound dehiscence) 1
• Elective colorectal surgery: Drains associated with delayed discharge and increased surgical site infection risk in 1,805-patient prospective study 1
• Emergency colorectal surgery: EuroSurg Collaborative found no benefit 1

Clean and Clean-Contaminated Cases:

• World Society of Emergency Surgery and WHO discourage routine prophylactic use due to lack of supporting evidence 2, 4

---

Limited Indications (When Drains May Be Considered)

JP Drain-Specific Indications

High-Risk Leak Situations:

• Leak-prone hepatopancreatobiliary surgery (pancreatoduodenectomy, biliary procedures) where monitoring for pancreatic fistula or bile leak is critical 5
• Lumbar spine surgery with identified CSF leak: Prolonged subfascial JP drainage (10-17 days) can manage postoperative CSF leaks without reoperation 6

Well-Localized Fluid Collections:

• Documented abscesses or fluid collections requiring active drainage 7
• Delayed intervention (>24 hours) with extensive peritoneal contamination 7

Penrose Drain-Specific Indications

Superficial Drainage:

• Skin flora-related infections where passive drainage suffices 1
• Situations requiring simple capillary drainage without need for suction 1

Modified Systems:

• Suction-type cigarette drain (Penrose + JP combination) for extensive abdominal contamination or high-risk pancreatic surgery 5

---

Comparative Selection Algorithm

When drainage is deemed absolutely necessary (rare):

1. Assess contamination level:

   • Minimal contamination, early intervention (<24 hours): Avoid drains 7
   • Extensive contamination, delayed intervention (>24 hours): Consider JP drain 7

2. Evaluate drainage needs:

   • Active suction required (fluid/air evacuation): JP drain preferred 1, 3
   • Passive drainage sufficient: Penrose may suffice 1

3. Consider anatomical location:

   • Deep cavities, intraperitoneal: JP drain if necessary 1
   • Superficial wounds: Penrose if necessary 1

4. Duration of drainage:

   • Short-term (<3 days): Either type 1
   • Prolonged (>3 days): JP drain (but note: interpretation difficult after 3 days due to colonization) 1

---

Critical Management Principles

Removal Criteria

• Remove as soon as possible to reduce drainage time and hospital stay 4
• JP drains: Remove when output <300-500 mL/day of serous fluid 4
• Remove if infection suspected 1
• Drains left >3 days become colonized, making culture interpretation difficult 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

1. Paradoxical infection risk: Drains provide conduit for bacterial entry, increasing rather than decreasing infection rates 1, 2
2. Delayed discharge: Drain presence prolongs hospitalization without clinical benefit 1, 2
3. False security: Drains do not reliably detect or prevent anastomotic leaks or collections 1
4. JP bulb evacuation technique matters: Side-in evacuation generates 5× more suction than bottom-up method 3
5. Overfilling reduces function: JP drain pressure drops dramatically with fluid accumulation; empty regularly 3

---

Drain-Related Morbidity

Documented complications include:

• Fever 1
• Wound infections 1
• Peritoneal fluid accumulation 1
• Wound dehiscence 1
• Increased surgical site infections 1, 2
• Prolonged hospitalization 1, 2

---

Bottom Line for Clinical Practice

The default position should be NO DRAIN for routine prophylaxis in emergency or elective abdominal surgery. 1, 2, 4 Reserve JP drains exclusively for documented high-risk leak scenarios (pancreatic, biliary, CSF) or established fluid collections requiring active drainage. 7, 5, 6 Penrose drains have extremely limited modern indications given their passive nature and lack of controlled drainage. 1