CA-125: Clinical Uses and Diagnostic Correlation
CA-125 is a tumor marker primarily used for monitoring treatment response and detecting recurrence in epithelial ovarian cancer, NOT for screening, and should be correlated with imaging studies (CT, MRI, or PET-CT) to validate clinical significance. 1
Primary Clinical Uses
Monitoring Established Ovarian Cancer
- CA-125 is most valuable for tracking disease response to chemotherapy and detecting recurrence in patients with proven epithelial ovarian cancer, particularly when levels were initially elevated at diagnosis 1, 2
- The NCCN recommends measuring CA-125 at every follow-up visit (every 2-4 months for 2 years, then every 3-6 months for 3 years, then annually) if the marker was initially elevated 3
- Serial CA-125 monitoring can detect recurrent disease 2-6 months before clinical symptoms appear, though early treatment based solely on rising CA-125 does not improve survival or quality of life 3
Differential Diagnosis of Pelvic Masses
- CA-125 helps differentiate benign from malignant pelvic masses when combined with imaging, with normal values typically below 35 U/mL and specificity of 98.5% in women over 50 years 1
- The marker has approximately 80% sensitivity for stage II or greater ovarian cancer but only 50% sensitivity for stage I disease, making it inadequate as a standalone screening tool 1, 2
Critical Limitations
Poor Screening Performance
- CA-125 should NOT be used for ovarian cancer screening in asymptomatic women due to high false-positive rates and lack of mortality benefit 1, 4
- The positive predictive value is only about 2% in average-risk women, meaning 98% of positive tests are false positives 5
Benign Conditions Causing Elevation
- Common false-positive causes include endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, benign ovarian cysts, menstruation, pregnancy, peritonitis, pleural effusion, ascites, and cirrhosis 1, 6, 4
- Cirrhosis with ascites universally elevates CA-125 because mesothelial cells under pressure produce the antigen 6, 7
- Elevations up to 1000-5000 U/mL can occur in benign conditions, limiting diagnostic specificity 4
Correlation with Other Tests for Validation
Imaging Studies (Essential Correlation)
- When CA-125 is elevated or rising, imaging with chest/abdominal/pelvic CT, MRI, or PET-CT is indicated to evaluate for actual disease presence 3, 1
- Transvaginal ultrasound with color or power Doppler is the primary imaging modality for evaluating pelvic masses, looking for solid components, papillary projections, thick septations, or ascites 6
- MRI with IV contrast is superior to CT for characterizing indeterminate adnexal masses 5
Additional Tumor Markers
- Measuring CEA and CA 19-9 alongside CA-125 helps distinguish primary ovarian tumors from gastrointestinal metastases 6, 2
- A CA-125/CEA ratio >25 favors ovarian origin over gastrointestinal origin 6
- CA 19-9 offers high sensitivity for mucinous ovarian tumors, which often fail to express CA-125 (only 16% positivity in mucinous cystadenocarcinoma) 2, 8
Clinical Assessment
- Physical examination including pelvic exam should accompany CA-125 monitoring at each visit 3
- Complete blood count and chemistry profile should be obtained as clinically indicated 3
Histologic Specificity
- CA-125 shows highest sensitivity (89%) for serous cystadenocarcinoma but markedly low sensitivity (16%) for mucinous cystadenocarcinoma 8
- High-grade serous carcinoma accounts for 70% of epithelial ovarian cancers, making CA-125 useful in the majority of cases 6
Other Malignancies with CA-125 Elevation
- Non-gynecologic cancers that can elevate CA-125 include colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer 6, 7
- CA-125 is also useful in select endometrial cancer patients with advanced disease, serous histology, or elevated pretreatment levels 6
Key Clinical Pitfalls
- Never use CA-125 alone to make surgical decisions—always correlate with imaging and clinical findings 6
- Avoid testing CA-125 in patients with ascites of any cause, as it is universally elevated and nonspecific 6
- Progressive elevation of CA-125 over time, even within normal range, may indicate malignancy and warrants further evaluation 1, 5
- The Society of Gynecologic Oncology recommends discussing the pros and cons of CA-125 monitoring with patients, as treating recurrences early based solely on elevated CA-125 does not improve survival 3